International Journal of Historical Archaeology

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 248–262 | Cite as

Microwear Analysis of Retouched Glass Fragments from Fortlet Miñana, Azul, Argentina, 1860–1863

  • Ignacio Clemente Conte
  • Facundo Gómez Romero


This paper presents the results of a microscopic analysis conducted on supposedly retouched glass fragments that were likely used as tools. The pieces were recovered in a series of excavations performed at the historical site of Fortlet Miñana (1860–1869), a military settlement used during the war against the Indians on the southern border of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. The use of glass as raw material in archaeological sites of the historic period has frequently been reported in the Pampas and Patagonian regions. In this paper we present a review of ethnohistoric and ethnographic sources concerning the use of glass side scrapers, end scrapers, and arrowheads by aboriginal groups throughout the world. In order to perform the analysis, the glass fragments from Fortlet Miñana were compared to a series of experimental pieces on which traces of deliberate use on two kinds of raw material, wood and hide, were identified. The experimental approach and the microscopic analysis demonstrate that the retouched glass fragments recovered at Fortlet Miñana were not used as tools. Therefore, we conclude that microscopic analysis is of significant use to all researchers working with materials of this kind.


Glass Experimental archaeology Microwear analysis Argentina 



Special thanks are due to Estela Mansur for her constructive comments on this paper.


  1. Bridges L (1978) El último confín de la Tierra. Ediciones Marymar, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  2. Casamiquela R (1978) Temas patagónicos de interés arqueológico. III. La técnica de la talla de vidrio. Relac Soc Argent Antropol 12:213–223Google Scholar
  3. Clark J (1981) Glass scrapers from historic North America. Lithic Technol 10(2 and 3):31–34Google Scholar
  4. Clemente Conte I (1997) Los instrumentos líticos de Túnel VII: una aproximación etnoarqueológica, Treballs D’Etnoarqueologia 2. CSIC-UAB, MadridGoogle Scholar
  5. Clemente Conte I, Gibaja J (1998) Working processes on cereals: an approach through microwear analysis. J Archaeol Sci 25:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper J (1963) The Ona. In: Steward J (ed) Handbook of South American Indians, vol I. Cooper Square, New York, pp 107–126Google Scholar
  7. Deal M, Hayden B (1987) The persistence of pre-Columbian lithic technology in the form of glassworking. In: Hayden B (ed) Lithic studies among the contemporary highland Maya. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 235–331Google Scholar
  8. Ébelot A (1968) Recuerdos y relatos de la guerra de fronteras. Editorial Hachette, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster M, Bradley R (1985) Questions and inquiries into the formation of edge damage on glass fragments. In: Beck C (ed) Views of the Jornada Mogollon: proceedings of the second Jornada Mogollon archaeological conference, contributions in archaeology, vol. 12. Eastern New Mexico University Press, Portales, pp 107–111Google Scholar
  10. García Enciso I (1980) Tolderías, fuertes y fortines. EMECÉ, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibaja J (1993) El cómo y el porqué de la experimentación en análisis funcional. Rev Arqueol 148:10–15Google Scholar
  12. Gómez Otero J (1987) Un raspador de vidrio confeccionado por una Tehuelche meridional. Mundo Ameghin 7:1–3Google Scholar
  13. Gómez Romero F (1999) Sobre lo arado: el pasado. Arqueología histórica en los alrededores del Fortín Miñana (1860–1869). Biblos, AzulGoogle Scholar
  14. Gómez Romero F (2002) Philosophy and historical archaeology: Foucault and a singular technology of power development at the borderlands of nineteenth century, Argentina. Journal of Social Archaeology 2(3):402–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gusinde M (1986) Los indios de Tierra del Fuego. Los Yamana, Centro Argentino de Etnología Americana. CONICET, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  16. Harkey M (1980) Bottle glass as lithic tool: an experimental approach. In: Kirkpatrick D (ed) Prehistory and history of the Ojo Amarillo, Appendix I. CRM division. New Mexico State University, Las CrucesGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson D (1991a) Los instrumentos de vidrio de Cuarto Chorrillo, costa de Bahía Santiago, Estrecho de Magallanes. An Inst Patagon 20:69–74Google Scholar
  18. Jackson D (1991b) Raspadores de vidrio en Dinamarquero: reflejo de una encrucijada cultural. An Inst Patagon 20:58–67Google Scholar
  19. Jackson D (1999) Raspadores de vidrio en un asentamiento Aonikenk en el valle del Zurdo, zona central de Magallanes. An Inst Patagon 27:175–181Google Scholar
  20. Keeley L (1980) Experimental determination of stone tool uses: a microwear analysis. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Knoblock K, Vanderpot R (1997) Analyses: modified glass. In: Vanderpot R, Majewski T (eds) The forgotten soldiers, historical and archaeological investigations of the Apache scouts at fort Huachuca, Arizona. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 109–139Google Scholar
  22. Lorrain D (1968) An archaeologist’s guide to nineteenth century American glass. Hist Archaeol 2:35–44Google Scholar
  23. Lothrop S (1928) The Indians of Tierra del Fuego. Museum of the American Indian. Heye Foundation, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Mansur E (1982) Microwear analysis of natural and use striations: new clues to the mechanisms of striation formation. Studia Praehistorica Belgica 2:213–233Google Scholar
  25. Mansur-Franchomme E (1986) Microscopie du matériel lithique: traces d’utilisation, altérations naturelles, accidentelles et technologiques. Cahiers du Quaternaire, no. 9. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, BordeauxGoogle Scholar
  26. Mintz S, Price R (1976) The birth of African-American culture. Beacon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Moreno P (1994) Estudio tipológico de bases y picos de botellas de la imprenta Coni y San Telmo. Historical Archaeology in Latin America 1:103–123Google Scholar
  28. Pedrotta V, Gómez Romero F (1998) Historical archaeology: an outlook from the Argentinean Pampas. Int J Hist Archaeol 2:113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Purdy B, Clark D (1987) Weathering of inorganic materials: dating and other applications. In: Schiffer M (ed) Advances in archaeological method and theory. 11. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 211–253Google Scholar
  30. Ramos M (1998) Vidrio y piedras talladas en un fortín. ¿La misma tecnología? Proceedings of Jornadas regionales de Historia y arqueología del siglo XIX 1:141–147Google Scholar
  31. Runnels C (1975) A note on glass implements from Greece. Lithic Technol 4(3):29–30Google Scholar
  32. Runnels C (1976) More on glass implements from Greece. Lithic Technol 3:27–31Google Scholar
  33. Sanford P (1975) Conservation of artifacts: a question of survival. Hist Archaeol 9:55–64Google Scholar
  34. Schávelzon D (1991) Arqueología histórica de Buenos Aires, la cultura material porteña de los siglos XVIII y XIX, Ed. Corregidor, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  35. Semenov S (1964) Prehistoric technology. Cory, Adams and Mackay, , LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Shaeffer J (1961) Glass flake-scrapers. Plains Anthropol 6:275–285Google Scholar
  37. Silva Macedo J (1997) Garrafas, frascos e pontas de flecha. Consideraçoes sobre ovidrio do sítio da Guarda de Sao Martinho-RS. Rev CEPA 21(26):91–112Google Scholar
  38. Teague G (1980) Reward mine and associated sites: historical archaeology on the Papago reservation. Western Archaeological Center, National Park Service, , Tucson Publications in anthropology 11Google Scholar
  39. Vaughan P (1981) Lithic Microwear Experimentation and the functional analysis of a Lower Magdalenian stone tool assemblage. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilkie L (1996) Glass-knapping at a Louisiana plantation: African-American tools. Hist Archaeol 30(4):37–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ignacio Clemente Conte
    • 1
  • Facundo Gómez Romero
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Arqueología y AntropologíaInst. Milá y Fontanals-CSICBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de PrehistoriaUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Facultat de LletresBellaterraSpain

Personalised recommendations