Zooarchaeology, Improvement and the British Agricultural Revolution



This paper seeks to revisit the debate concerning the nature and timing of the British Agricultural Revolution. Specifically, it considers how zooarchaeological evidence can be employed to investigate later-medieval and post-medieval “improvements” in animal husbandry. Previous studies of animal bone assemblages have indicated that the size of many domestic species in England increases from the fifteenth century—an observation that has been used to support the writings of those historians that have argued that the Agricultural Revolution occurred several centuries prior to the traditionally ascribed date of 1760–1840. Here, zooarchaeological data are presented which suggest that the size of cattle, sheep, pig and domestic fowl were increasing from as early as the fourteenth century. However, it is argued that the description of these changes as revolutionary is misleading and disguises the interplay of factors that influenced agricultural practice in the post-Black Death period. This paper concludes with a plea for greater awareness of the value of collecting and analysing faunal data from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to enable the historically attested productivity increases of the traditionally dated Agricultural Revolution to be examined archaeologically.


zooarchaeology improvement Agricultural Revolution animal husbandry England 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albarella, U. (1997). Size, power and veal: Zooarchaeological evidence for late medieval innovations. In de Boe, G. and Verhaeghe, F. (eds.), Environment and Subsistence in Medieval Europe: Papers of the ‘Medieval Europe Brugge 1997’ Conference Volume 9, I.A.P. Rapporten 9, Zellik, pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
  2. Albarella, U. (2002). ‘Size matters’: How and why biometry is still important in zooarchaeology. In Dobney, K. and O'Connor, T. P. (eds.), Festschrift for Don Brothwell, Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
  3. Albarella, U., and Davis, S. (1996). Mammals and birds from Launceston Castle, Cornwall: Decline in status and the rise of agriculture. Circaea 12: 1–156.Google Scholar
  4. Albarella, U., and Payne, S. (2005). Neolithic pigs from Durrington Walls, Wiltshire, England: A biometrical database. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albarella, U., Beech, M., and Mulville, J. (1997). The Saxon, Medieval and Post-Medieval Mammal and Bird Bones Excavated 1989–1991 from Castle Mall, Norwich, Norfolk, Ancient Monuments Laboratory Report 72/97, London.Google Scholar
  6. Allen, R. C. (1991). The two English Agricultural Revolutions, 1450–1850. In Campbell, B. and Overton, M. (eds.), Land, Labour and Livestock: Historical Studies in European Agricultural Productivity, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 236–254.Google Scholar
  7. Andrews, A., and Noddle, B. (1975). Absence of premolar teeth from ruminant mandibles found at archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 2: 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckett, J. V. (1990). The Agricultural Revolution, Basil Blackwood Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Boland, P. (1984). Dudley Castle Archaeological Project—First Interim Report (1983–1984). West Midlands Archaeology 27: 1–20.Google Scholar
  10. Bull, G., and Payne, S. (1988). Components of variation in measurements of pig bones and teeth, and the use of measurements to distinguish wild from domestic pig remains, Archaezoologia 2: 27–65.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, B. M. S., and Overton, M. (1993). A new perspective on medieval and early modern agriculture: Six centuries of Norfolk farming, c.1250–c.1850. Past and Present 141: 38–105.Google Scholar
  12. Chambers, J. D., and Mingay, G. E. (1966). The Agricultural Revolution 1750–1880, B. T. Batsford, London.Google Scholar
  13. Cossette, E., and Horad-Herbin, M.-P. (2003). A contribution to the morphometrical study of cattle in Colonial North America. Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, S. J. M. (1992). A Rapid Method for Recording Information about Mammal Bones from Archaeological Sites, Ancient Monuments Laboratory Report 19/92, London.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, S. J. M. (1996). Measurements of a group of adult female Shetland sheep skeletons from a single flock: A baseline for zooarchaeologists. Journal of Archaeological Science 23: 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, S. J. M. (1997). The Agricultural Revolution in England: Some zooarchaeological evidence. Anthropozoologica 25/ 26: 413–428.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, S. J. M., and Beckett, J. V. (1999). Animal husbandry and agricultural improvement: The archaeological evidence from animal bones and teeth. Rural History 10: 1–17.Google Scholar
  18. Dyer, C. C. (1981). Warwickshire Farming 1349–c.1520: Preparations for Agricultural Revolution, Dugdale Society Occasional Papers No. 27, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Dyer, C. C. (1997). Medieval farming and technology: Conclusion. In Astill, G. and Langdon, J. (eds.), Medieval Farming and Technology: The Impact of Agricultural Change in Northwest Europe, Brill, Leiden, pp. 293–312.Google Scholar
  20. Dobney, K., Jaques, S. D., and Irving, B. G. (1996). Of Butchers and Breeds: Report on Vertebrate Remains from Various Sites in the City of Lincoln, Lincoln Archaeological Studies No. 5. Technical Print Services, Nottingham.Google Scholar
  21. von den Driesch, A. (1976). A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites, Peabody Museum Bulletin 1, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  22. Ernle, L. (1912). English Farming Past and Present, Longmans, Green, London.Google Scholar
  23. Fock, J. (1966). Metrische Untersuchungen an Metapodien einiger Europäischer Rinderrasen, Unpublished dissertation, University of Munich, Munich.Google Scholar
  24. Higham, C. (1969). The metrical attributes of two samples of bovine limb bones. Journal of Zoology 157: 63–74.Google Scholar
  25. Higham, C., and Message, M. (1969). An assessment of a prehistoric technique of bovine husbandry. In Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. (eds.), Science in Archaeology: A Survey of Progress and Research (2nd ed.), Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 315–330.Google Scholar
  26. Hopcraft, R. L. (1994). The social origins of agrarian change in late medieval England. The American Journal of Sociology 99(6): 1559–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, M. (1996). An Archaeology of Capitalism, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Kerridge, E. (1967). The Agricultural Revolution, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  29. Kerridge, E. (1969). The Agricultural Revolution reconsidered. Agricultural History 43: 463–476.Google Scholar
  30. Meadow, R. (1999). The use of size index scaling techniques for research on archaeozoological collections from the Middle East. In Becker, C., Manhart, H., Peters, J. and Schibler, J. (eds.), Historia Animalium ex Ossibus. Festschrift für Anglea von den Driesch, Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH, Rahden/Westf, pp. 285–300.Google Scholar
  31. Miles, A. E. W., and Grigson, C. (1990). Colyer's Variations and Diseases of the Teeth of Animals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Mingay, G. E. (1969). Dr. Kerridge's “Agricultural Revolution”: A comment. Agricultural History 42: 477–482.Google Scholar
  33. Mingay, G. E. (1989). The Agrarian History of England and Wales Volume VI, 1750–1850, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. O'Connor, T. P. (2000). The Archaeology of Animal Bones, Sutton, Stroud.Google Scholar
  35. Overton, M. (1984). Agricultural revolution? Development of the agrarian economy in early modern England. In Baker, A. R. H. and Gregory, D. (eds.), Explorations in Historical Geography: Interpretative Essays, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 118–235.Google Scholar
  36. Overton, M. (1996a). Re-establishing the English Agricultural Revolution. Agricultural History Review 44: 1–34.Google Scholar
  37. Overton, M. (1996b). Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy 1500–1850, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  38. Rackham, O. (1986). The History of the Countryside: The Classic History of Britain's Landscape, Flora and Fauna, Dent, London.Google Scholar
  39. Reitz, E., and Ruff, B. (1994). Morphometric data for cattle from North America and the Caribbean prior to the 1850s. Journal of Archaeological Science 21: 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thirsk, J. (1987). England's Agricultural Regions and Agrarian History in England, 1500–1700, Macmillan Education, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  41. Thomas, R. N. W. (1988). A statistical examination of criteria used in sexing cattle metapodials. Archaeozoologia 2: 83–92.Google Scholar
  42. Thomas, R. (1999). Feasting at Worcester Cathedral in the seventeenth century: A zooarchaeological and historical approach. Archaeological Journal 156: 342–358.Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, R. (2002). Animals, Economy and Status: The Integration of Historical and Zooarchaeological Data in the Study of a Medieval Castle, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
  44. Thomas, R. (2003). The 19th–20th century animal bones from Stafford Castle: An educational collection and a zooarchaeological investigation, Unpublished report.Google Scholar
  45. Thomas, R. (2005). Animals, Economy and Status: Integrating Zooarchaeological and Historical Data in the Study of Dudley Castle, West Midlands (c. 1100–1750), BAR British Series 392. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
  46. Trow-Smith, R. (1957). A History of British Livestock Husbandry to 1700, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  47. Turner, M. E., Beckett, J. V., and Afton, B. (2001). Farm Production in England 1700–1914, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  48. Verhulst, A. (1990). The “Agricultural Revolution” of the Middle Ages reconsidered. In Bachrach, B. S. and Nicholas, D. (eds.), Law, Custom and the Social Fabric of Medieval Europe: Essays in Honor of Bryce Lyon, Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, Michigan, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
  49. Williamson, T. (2002). The Transformation of Rural England: Farming and the Landscape 1700–1870, University of Exeter Press, Exeter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Archaeology and Ancient HistoryUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations