Students’ Activity in Computer-Supported Collaborative Problem Solving in Mathematics



The purpose of this study was to analyse secondary school students’ (N = 16) computer-supported collaborative mathematical problem solving. The problem addressed in the study was: What kinds of metacognitive processes appear during computer-supported collaborative learning in mathematics? Another aim of the study was to consider the applicability of networked learning in mathematics. The network-based learning environment Knowledge Forum (KF) was used to support students’ collaborative problem solving. The data consist of 188 posted computer notes, portfolio material such as notebooks, and observations. The computer notes were analysed through three stages of qualitative content analysis. The three stages were content analysis of computer notesin mathematical problem solving, content analysis of mathematical problem solving activity and content analysis of the students’ metacognitive activity. The results of the content analysis illustrate how networked discussions mediated mathematical knowledge and students’ questions, while the mathematical problem solving activity shows that the students co-regulate their thinking. The results of the content analysis of the students’ metacognitive activity revealed that the students use metacognitive knowledge and make metacognitive judgments and perform monitoring during networked discussions. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that working with the networked technology contributes to the students’ use of their mathematical knowledge and stimulates them into making their thinking visible. The findings also show some metacognitive activity in the students’ computer-supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics.


computer-supported collaborative learning mathematics metacognition problem solving 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J., Greeno, J., Reder, L., Simon, H. 2000Perspectives on learning, thinking and activityEducational Researcher291113Google Scholar
  2. Bransford, J., Brown, A., Cocking, R. 2000How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and SchoolNational Academy PressWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, A.L. 1987Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other mysterious mechanismsF., WeinertR., Kluwe eds. Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding.Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale NJ65115Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A.L., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R. and Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In P. Mussen (Ed), Handbook of Child Psychology3 (pp. 77–166). J. Flavell and E. Markman (Vol. Eds.) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Chi, M.T.H. 1997Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guideJournal of the Learning Sciences6271315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). From visual word problems to learning communities: Changing conceptions of cognitive research. In K. Gilly (Ed), Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice (pp. 157–200). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1996). Multimedia environments for enchaning learning in mathematics. In S. Vosniadau, E. De Corte R. Glaser and H. Mandl (Eds), International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments (pp. 285–306) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, J.E., Sternberg, R.J. 1998Smart problem solving: How metacognition helpsHacker, D.Dunlosky, J.Graesser, A. eds. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practise.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates PublishersMahwah, NJ4768Google Scholar
  9. De Corte, E. 1996Changing views of computer-supported learning environments for the acquisition of knowledge and thinking skillsVosniadau, S.De Corte, E.Glaser, R.Mandl, H. eds. International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, PublishersMahwah, NJ129148Google Scholar
  10. De Corte, E. 2000Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practise: A␣permanent challenge for instructional psychologyLearning and Instruction10249266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Corte, E., Greer, , B., , Verschaffel, , L.,  1996Mathematics teaching and learningBerliner, D.Calfee, R. eds. Handbook of Educational Psychology.MacmillanNew York491549Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, F., Mandl, H. 2001Fostering Shared Knowledge with Graphical Representation Tools in Different Collaboration Scenarios. Research Report Nr. 135. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates PublishersMahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  13. Flavell, J. 1979Metacognition and cognitive monitoringA new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist34906911Google Scholar
  14. Flavell, J. 1987Speculations about the nature and development of metacognitionIn:Weinert, F.Kluwe, R. eds. Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding.Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ2129Google Scholar
  15. Garofalo, J., Lester, F.K.,Jr. 1985Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performanceJournal for Research in Mathematics Education16163176Google Scholar
  16. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P. 2002Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solvingEducational Studies in Mathematics2193223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greeno, J. 1989A perspective on thinkingAmerican Psychologist44134141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaput, J. 1992Technology and mathematics educationIn:Grouws, D. eds. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning.MacmillanNew York515556Google Scholar
  19. Kaput, J., Thompson, P. 1994Technology in mathematics education research: The first 25 years in the JRMEJournal for Research in Mathematics Education25676684Google Scholar
  20. Koschmann, T. 1996Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introductionKoschmann, T. eds. CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm.Lawrence Erlbaum PublishersMahwah, NJ124Google Scholar
  21. Koschmann, T., Hall, R., Miyake, N. 2002CSCL 2. Carrying Forward the ConversationLawrence Erlbaum Associates, PublishersMahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  22. Lampert, M., Loewenberg Ball, D. 1998Teaching, Multimedia, and Mathematics: Investigations of Real PracticeTeachers College PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Lehtinen, E. 2003Computer-supported collaborative learning: An approach to powerful learning environmentsDe Corte, E.Verschaffel, L.Entwistle, N.Van Merriëboer, J. eds. Powerful Learning Environments: Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions.PergamonAmsterdam3554Google Scholar
  24. Papert, S. 1980Mindstorm: Children, Computers, and Powerful IdeasBasic BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Pintrich P., Wolters C. and Baxter G. (2000) Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In: Schraw G., Impara J. (eds), Issues in the Measurements of Metacognition. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. University of Nebraska-Lincoln pp. 43–98Google Scholar
  26. Polya, G. 1973How to solve itPrincetonNew JerseyGoogle Scholar
  27. Resnick, L.B. 1991Shared cognition: Thinking as social practiceResnick, L.B.Levine, J.Teasley, S. eds. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition.American Psychological AssociationWashington122Google Scholar
  28. Resnick, L.B., Levine, J., Teasley, S. 1991Perspectives on Socially Shared CognitionAmerican Psychological AssociationWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. Roschelle, J., Teasley, S.D. 1995Construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solvingO’Malley, C. eds. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.Springer-VerlagNew York69100Google Scholar
  30. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. 1996Adaptation and understanding. A case for new cultures of schooling.Vosniadau, S.De Corte, E.Glaser, R.Mandl, H. eds. International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates PublishersMahwah, NJ149164Google Scholar
  31. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Lamon, M. 1994The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3McGilly, K. eds. Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice.MIT Press/Bradford BooksCambridge, MA201229Google Scholar
  32. Schoenfeld, A.H. 1985Mathematical Problem SolvingAcademic Press, Inc.OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoenfeld, A.H. 1987What’s all the fuss about metacognition?Schoenfeld, A. eds. Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education.Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ189215Google Scholar
  34. Schoenfeld, A.H. 1992Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematicsGrouws, D. eds. Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning.MacmillanNew York334370Google Scholar
  35. Schraw, G. 1998Promoting general metacognitive awarenessInstructional Science26113125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sfard, A. 2000On reform movement and the limits of mathematical discourseMathematical Thinking and Learning2157189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sfard, A., Nesher, P., Streefl, L., Cobb, P., Mason, J. 1998Learning mathematics through conversation: Is it as good as they say?For the Learning of Mathematics184151Google Scholar
  38. Silver, E. 1996Moving beyond learning alone and in silence: Observations from the quasar project concerning communication in mathematics classroomSchauble, L.Glaser, R. eds. Innovations in Learning, New Environments for Education.Lawrence ErlbaumMahwah127159Google Scholar
  39. Steinbring, H. 1998Mathematical understanding in classroom interaction: The interrelation of social and epistemological constrainsSeeger, F.Voigt, J.Waschescio, U. eds. The Culture of the Mathematics Classroom.Cambridge University PressCambridge344372Google Scholar
  40. Van Oers, B. 2001Educational forms of iniation in mathematical cultureEducational Studies in Mathematics.465985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weinert, F.E. 1987Introduction and overview: Metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understandingWeinert, F.Kluwe, R. eds. Metacognition Motivation and Understanding Lawrence Erlbaum.HillsdaleNJ116Google Scholar
  42. Yerushalmy, M., Chazan, D. 1990Overcoming visual obstacles with the aid of the supposerEducational Studies in Mathematics21199220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Unit for Educational Technology, Department of Educational Sciences and Teacher EducationUniversity of OuluFinland

Personalised recommendations