Skip to main content
Log in

A Social Exchange Perspective on Outside of Class Interactions between Underrepresented Students and Faculty

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing explanations of faculty-student interactions emphasize social-organizational characteristics of higher education to the exclusion of social-psychological dimensions of the interactions themselves. Yet, student perceptions are essential cognitive elements that influence frequency of, and growth from, informal interaction with faculty. Drawing on a survey of students at a large public university, this paper expands theoretical understanding of faculty-student interactions by considering how social exchange theory helps explain frequency of, and growth from, informal interactions—and how such patterns vary by social identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anaya, G., & Cole, D. (2001). Latina/o student achievement: Exploring the influence of student-faculty interaction on college grades. Journal of College Student Development, 42(1), 3-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard-Brak, L., Lechtenberger, D., & Lan, W.Y. (2010). Accommodation strategies of college students with disabilities. The Qualitative Report, 15(2): 411-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieschke, K.J., Eberz, A.B., & Wilson, D. (2000). Empirical investigations of lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students. In V.A. Wall & N.J Evans (Eds.), Toward acceptance: Sexual orientation issues on campus (pp. 31-58). Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.

  • Bowman, N. A. (2010). The development of psychological well-being among first-year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 51(2), 180-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, J.M. (2014). Coached for the classroom: Parents’ cultural transmission and children’s reproduction of educational inequalities. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 1015-1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.G. (2007). Do interracial interactions matter? An examination of student-faculty contact and intellectual self-concept. Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 249-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.G. (2010). The role of faculty contact on minority students’ educational gains. Journal of the Professoriate, 3 (2), 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.G. & Griffin, K.A. (2013). Advancing the study of student-faculty interaction: A focus on diverse students and faculty. In M.B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 28, pp. 561-611). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. & Espinoza, A. (2008). Improving the academic performance of Latinos in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 285-300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, S.R., & Wilson, B. (2006). Student-faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinents. Higher Education, 51, 487-519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B.E., McIntosh, K., Terenzini, P.T., Reason, R.D., Quaye, B.R. (2010). Pedagogical signals of faculty approachability: Factors shaping faculty-student interaction outside the classroom. Research in Higher Education, 51(8), 767-788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B.E. & Orehovec, E. (2007). Faculty-student interactions outside the classroom: A typology from a residential college. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 343-362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, L. (2014). Programs and practices that retain students from the first to second year: Results from a national study. New Directions for Institutional Research, (160), 53-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dika, S.L. (2012. Relations with faculty as social capital for college students: Evidence from Puerto Rio. Journal of College Student Development, 53(4), 596-610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiRamio, D., Ackerman, R., & Mitchell, R. L. (2008). From combat to campus: Voices of student-veterans. NASPA Journal, 45(1), 73-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M. (1981). Social exchange theory. In M. Rosenberg & R.H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological Perspectives (pp. 30-65). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsan, M.K. & Clarkberg, M.E. (2010). Race differences in the impact of students’ out-of-class interactions with faculty. Journal of the Professoriate, 3(2), 104-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, J.C. & Inkelas, K.K. (2012). Exploring relationships between sexual orientation and satisfaction with faculty and staff interactions. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(8), 1167-1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, B., Graham, S., & Scales, W. (1995). Adults with learning disabilities: Educational and social experiences during college. Exceptional Children, 61(5), 460-471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, K.A. (2012). Black professors managing mentorship: Implications of applying social exchange frameworks to analyses of student interactions and their influence on scholarly productivity. Teachers College Record 114(5):1-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S. (1994). The institutional climate for talented Latino students. Research in Higher Education, 35(1), 21-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S. Eagan, M.K., Tran, M.C., Newman, C.B., Chang, M.J., & Velasco, P. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553-579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, A. J., & Hinz, D. (2008). The effects of part-time faculty on first semester freshmen retention: A predictive model using logistic regression. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10(3), 265-286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. K., & Lundberg, C. A. (2016). A structural model of the relationship between student–faculty interaction and cognitive skills development among college students. Research in Higher Education, 57(3), 288-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.K., Chang, M.J., and Park, J.J. (2009). Engaging with faculty: examining rates, predictors, and educational effects for Asian American undergraduates. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2(4), 206-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.K., & Sax, L.J. (2009). Student-faculty interactions in research universities: differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50, 437-459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2017). The impact of college students’ interactions with faculty: A review of general and conditional effects. In M.B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 32, pp. 85-139). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review 61(1), 89-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthall, A. (2012). Ten things you should know about today’s student veteran. Thought & Action. Fall: 80-89.

  • McPherson, M.S., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, K. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, M. J., & King, P. (2008). How curricular content and pedagogical strategies affect moral reasoning development in college students. Journal of Moral Education, 37(1), 17-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L.D (2006). The social exchange framework. In P.J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 24-45). Stanford, CA: Stanford Social Sciences.

  • Osborne, N. J. (2014). Veteran ally: Practical strategies for closing the military-civilian gap on campus. Innovative Higher Education, 39(3), 247-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, R. D., Johnson, M. P., & Pascarella, E. T. (2012). First-generation undergraduate students and the impacts of the first year of college: Additional evidence. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 243-266.

  • Pascarella, E.T., and Terenzini, P.T. (1977). Patterns of student-faculty informal interaction beyond the classroom and voluntary freshman attrition. Journal of Higher Education, 48(5), 540-552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.T., and Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaye, S. J., Tambascia, T. P., & Talesh, R. A. (2009). Engaging racial/ethnic minority students in predominantly White classroom environments. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 157-178). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, S., & Beemyn, G. (2012). Beyond a binary: The lives of gender-nonconforming youth. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 17, 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn 2010. LGBT and queer research in higher education: State and status of the field. Educational Researcher, 39, 132-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L.J., Bryant, A.N., & Harper, C.E. (2005). The differential effects of student-faculty interaction on college outcomes of women and men. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 642-657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (2007). Accessing social capital through the academic mentoring process. Equity and Excellence in Education, 40(1), 36-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Umbach, P. & Wawrzynski, M.R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Thai-Huy Nguyen for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Availability of Data

Data requests may be sent to the first author at: drj@unr.edu

Funding

N/A

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, D.R., Scheitle, C.P., Juvera, A. et al. A Social Exchange Perspective on Outside of Class Interactions between Underrepresented Students and Faculty. Innov High Educ 45, 489–507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09518-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09518-6

Keywords

Navigation