Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 397–405 | Cite as

Does Learning-Centered Teaching Promote Grade Improvement?

  • Alison M. Mostrom
  • Phyllis Blumberg


When the grade distribution within a course shifts towards higher grades, it may be due to grade inflation or grade improvement. If the positive shift is accompanied by an increase in achievement or learning, it should be considered grade improvement, not grade inflation. Effective learning-centered teaching is designed to promote student learning due to increased responsibility for learning, engagement with course material, and opportunity for formative assessments prior to summative assessments of course learning outcomes, which leads to improved grades. We suggest ways that faculty members practicing learning-centered teaching can collect and analyze data to support increased learning and grade improvement.


Learning-centered teaching Grade improvement Grade inflation 



We thank Jason A. Porter, University of the Sciences; John Immerwahr, Villanova University; and three anonymous journal reviewers for their critical review of this manuscript.


  1. Alexander, P., & Murphy, P. (1998). The research base for APA's leaner-centered psychological principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn (pp. 25–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Alsardary, S., Pontiggia, L., Hamid, M., & Blumberg, P. (2011). Primary trait analysis to assess a learner-centered, upper-level mathematics course. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 21(4), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12–25.Google Scholar
  4. Bejar, I. I., & Blew, E. O. (1981). Grade inflation and the validity of the Scholastic Aptitude Test. American Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 143–156.Google Scholar
  5. Bloxham, S., & Campbell, L. (2010). Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 291–300. doi: 10.1080/02602931003650045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumberg, P. (2000). Evaluating the evidence that problem-based learners are self-directed learners: A review of the literature. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 199–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Blumberg, P. (2007). Problem-based learning: A prototypical example of learning-centered teaching. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 3(2), 111–125.Google Scholar
  8. Blumberg, P. (2009). Developing learner-centered teaching: A practical guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Blumberg, P., & Pontiggia, L. (2011). Benchmarking the degree of implementation of learner-centered approaches. Innovative Higher Education, 36(3), 189–202. doi: 10.1007/s10755-010-9168-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boretz, E. (2004). Grade inflation and the myth of student consumerism. College Teaching, 52(2), 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denton, J. J., & Henson, K. T. (1979). Mastery learning and grade inflation. Educational Leadership, 37(2), 150–152.Google Scholar
  12. Derting, T. L., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate Biology: Positive relationship with long-term student achievement. CBE Life Sciences Education, 9(winter), 462–472. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-02-0011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862–864. doi: 10.1126/Science.1201783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hassel, H., & Lourey, J. (2005). The de(ar)th of student responsibility. College Teaching, 53(1), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu, S. (Ed.). (2005). Beyond grade inflation: Grading problems in higher education: ASHE higher education report, 30(6). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Kolevzon, M. S. (1981). Grade inflation in higher education: A comparative study. Research in Higher Education, 15(3), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lambert, N. M., & McCombs, B. L. (1998). Introduction: Learner-centered schools and classrooms as a direction for school reform. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  20. Mahalingam, M., Schaefer, F., & Morlino, E. (2008). Promoting student learning through group problem solving in general chemistry recitations. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(11), 1577–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mostrom, A. M., Blumberg, P., Kearney, P., & Peterson, A. (2010, June). Does learning-centered teaching promote grade inflation? Concurrent Session presented at the annual meeting of the Lilly Conference. College and University Teaching and Learning, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. Nelson, C. E. (2010). Dysfunctional illusions of rigor: Lessons from the scholarship of teaching and learning. In L. B. Nilson & J. E. Miller (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, 28 (pp. 177–192). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just-in-time teaching: Blending active learning with web technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Porter, J. A., Wolbach, K. C., Purzycki, C. B., Bowman, L. A., Agbada, E., & Mostrom, A. M. (2010). Integration of information and scientific literacy: Promoting literacy in undergraduates. CBE Life Sciences Education, 9(Winter), 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Potter, W., Nyman, M. A., & Klumpp, K. S. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: Analysis of grading trends at a small liberal arts college, grade inflation or progress? College and University: The Journal of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars, 76(4), 9–14.Google Scholar
  26. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.Google Scholar
  27. Seligman, D. (2002). The grade-inflation swindle. Forbes Magazine, 6, 94.Google Scholar
  28. Shin, J. H., Haynes, R. B., & Johnston, M. E. (1993). Effect of problem-based self-directed undergradaute education on life-long learning. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 184(6), 969–976.Google Scholar
  29. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.Google Scholar
  30. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of the SciencesPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Director of the Teaching and Learning CenterUniversity of the SciencesPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations