Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Research Encounter: An Innovative Course Inclusion that Facilitates Student Engagement

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The learning and engagement activity we describe was designed to demystify the research culture of the Health Faculty for first year students, and there are implications for practice in other fields. It is founded on the idea of research-based learning, which in its pure form is a respected pedagogical approach but problematic for large cohort (>500) first year students. As an assessment item, students were placed in small groups and were matched with faculty research staff and/or a research area to investigate. The students were surveyed before and after the research encounter; and results show that, among other findings, student engagement with peers and with the faculty were distinct positive outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3 & 4), 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E., Polkinghorne, D., Baumann, G., & Vallejo, E. (2004). Doing research that makes a difference. Journal of Higher Education, 75(1), 104–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 8(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer Commission (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Retrieved from http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/

  • Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and learning: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, J. (2008). Alienation and engagement: Development of an alternative theoretical framework for understanding student learning. Higher Education, 55(3), 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1997). The modern integration of research activities with teaching and learning. Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotten, S., & Wilson, B. (2006). Student–faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 51(4), 487–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garde-Hansen, J., & Calvert, B. (2007). Developing a research culture in the undergraduate curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., Morgan, A., & Taylor, E. (1984). The world of the learner. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 169–188). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S., Kuh, G., & Gayles, J. (2007). Engaging undergraduate students in research activities: Are research universities doing a better job? Innovative Higher Education, 32(3), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W., Inglis, S., Miller, S., & Sammon, S. (2007). Inquiry in higher education: Reflections and directions on course design and teaching methods. Innovative Higher Education, 31(4), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K.-L., & Coates, H. (2008). Students' engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In R. Gonyea & G. Kuh (Eds.), Using student engagement data in institutional research. New directions for institutional research, 141 (pp. 5–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6, 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team-based learning. In L. Michaelsen, M. Sweet, & D. Parmelee (Eds.), Team-based learning: Small group’s learning next big step. New directions for teaching and learning, 116 (pp. 7–27). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/tl.330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (2008). Practitioner-researcher imaginations: Teaching social research to health science undergraduates. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naug, H., & Colson, N. (2010). Research encounters: Seeding a research culture in first year. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(2), 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. (2008). Engaging first year students using a web-supported inquiry-based learning setting. Higher Education, 55(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Farmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Association between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23(3), 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J., & Blackler, G. (2006). Students' experiences of learning in a research environment. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(3), 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three- year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N., Wuetherick, B., & Healey, M. (2008). International perspectives on student awareness, experiences and perceptions of research: Implications for academic developers in implementing research-based teaching and learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 13(3), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen L. Naug.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naug, H.L., Colson, N.J. & Donner, D.G. The Research Encounter: An Innovative Course Inclusion that Facilitates Student Engagement. Innov High Educ 37, 335–345 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9210-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9210-z

Key words

Navigation