Abstract
In this article we develop the concept of transformational partnership and illustrate how such an understanding has enriched the relationship between a particular university and a school system. Transformational partnerships are different in purpose, nature, and strategies from transactional partnerships. They are based upon genuine engagement and a focus on common goals and mutual benefits. In transactional partnerships each institution pursues its own goals with little consideration of mutual goals or shared purpose. The areas of community engagement, leadership, and transformational partnerships provided key concepts for analysing the case study showing how higher education institutions can think and work differently with other institutions, organizations, and groups to achieve mutual benefits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Government. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra, ACT: Author. Retrieved June 13, 2010 from http://www.deewr.gov.au/he_review_finalreport
Australian Universities Community Engagement Alliance (2010). Principles of university engagement. Retrieved June 13, 2010, from http://aucea.com.au/about/aucea-principles-of-university-community-engagement
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
Bezzina, M. (2000). Catholic education: Corporate commodity or common good. Parramatta, NSW: Parramatta Catholic Education Office.
Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Brown, R. E., Reed, C. S., Bates, L. V., Knaggs, D., McKnight-Casey, K., & Barnes, J. V. (2006). The transformative engagement process: Foundations and supports for university-community partnerships. Journal of Higher Education, Outreach and Engagement, 11(1), 9–23.
Butcher, J., & Egan, L. (2008). Community engagement research: A question of partnership. The Australasian Journal of Community Partnership, 2(3), 106–112.
Butcher, J., & McDonald, L. (2007). Addressing challenges and making a difference. In J. Butcher & L. McDonald (Eds.), Making a Difference: Challenges for Teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education (pp. 3–14). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
Dhillon, J. K. (2009). The role of social capital in sustaining partnership. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 687–704.
Duignan, P., & Bezzina, M. (2006, October). Distributed leadership: The theory and the practice. Paper presented at the CCEAM Annual Conference, Hilton Cyprus Hotel, Lefkosia, Cyprus.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Gomm, R., Hammersley, M., & Foster, P. (2000). Case study method. London, England: Sage.
Grimshaw, W. (2002, March). Review of non-government schools in NSW: Report 1. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Department of Education and Training.
Harris, A. (2002, September). Distributed leadership in schools: Leading or misleading. Paper presented at the BELMAS annual conference, Aston University Lakeside Conference Centre, Birmingham, England.
Holland, B. A., & Gelmon, S. B. (1998). The state of the “engaged campus”: What have we learned about building and sustaining university-community partnerships? AAHE Bulletin, 51(2), 3–6.
Howard, P., Cooke, S., & Butcher, J. (2007). Transformational learning: An aboriginal educator's aspirations, supports and celebrations. In J. Butcher & L. McDonald (Eds.), Making a Difference: Challenges for Teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education (pp. 191–203). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Lane, B. (2007, March 28). Report rejects protected funding. The Australian, p. 35.
Lussier, R. N., & Achua, C. F. (2004). Leadership: Theory, application, skill development (2nd ed.). Eagan, MN: Thomson-West.
Moran, W., Harris, J., & Long, J. (2008). Pathways ventured, lessons learned: A sustained university-school partnership ten years on. Journal of Catholic School Studies, 80(2), 63–77.
Mullinix, B. B. (2002). Nurturing partnerships: A South African continuum of flexible stages in partnership development. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 3(2), 77–88.
Parramatta Diocesan Schools Board. (2000). Vision Statement. Parramatta, NSW: Author.
Punch, K. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London, England: Sage.
Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2010). “Fitting in” or “standing out”: Working class students in UK higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 107–123.
Sheehan, P. (2006). Some special challenges facing a contemporary Catholic university. Retrieved June 29, 2010, from http://www.acu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/254008/vc_challenges_2006.pdf
Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Starratt, R. J. (2004). Ethical Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.
United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Frequently asked questions: The UNDP approach to supporting capacity development. New York, NY: Author.
Vinson, T. (2007). Dropping off the edge. Richmond, NSW, Australia: Jesuit Social Services and Catholic Social Services Australia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butcher, J., Bezzina, M. & Moran, W. Transformational Partnerships: A New Agenda for Higher Education. Innov High Educ 36, 29–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9155-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9155-7