Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 125–138 | Cite as

Higher Education Trust, Rank and Race: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis



This study involved an analysis of faculty trust in a large southwestern institution. After reviewing the literature, we identified a valid and reliable instrument, the Higher Education Faculty Trust Inventory, to measure higher education faculty trust in administrators, colleagues, and students. We then used this instrument to gauge various aspects of faculty trust, and we found significant trust differences among professors of varying academic ranks (i.e., adjunct, assistant, associate, and full professor). We found, however, no significant trust differences in regard to race. Finally, we discuss the findings within a context of implications for future research and practice in higher education.

Key words

faculty trust rank race higher education 


  1. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, J. K. (1991). Towards understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a condition of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 643–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, J. K., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 19–28.Google Scholar
  5. Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 468–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chattopadhyay, P., & George, E. (2001). Examining the effects of work externalization through the lens of social identity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 781–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39–52.Google Scholar
  9. Cummings, L. L., & Bromily, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds). Trust in Organizations (pp. 302–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gabarro, J. J. (1978). The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In A. G. Athos & J. J. Gabarro (Eds.), Interpersonal behavior: Communication and understanding in relationships (pp. 290–303). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–238). New York, NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Good, D. (1988). Individuals, interpersonal relations, and trust. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 31–48). New York, NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Hanson, P. G., & Lubin, B. (1995). Answers to questions most frequently asked about organization development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Henderson, J. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1983). Leader authenticity: The development and test of an operational measure. Educational and Psychological Research, 3, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffman, J., Sabo, D., & Hoy, W. K. (1994). Building a culture of trust. Journal of School Leadership, 4, 484–581.Google Scholar
  18. Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoy, W. K. (2002). Faculty trust: A key to student achievement. Journal of School Public Relations, 23, 88–103.Google Scholar
  20. Hoy, W. K., & Henderson, J. E. (1983). Principal authenticity, school climate, and pupil control orientation. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 2, 123–130.Google Scholar
  21. Hoy, W. K., Hoffman, J., Sabo, D., & Bliss, J. R. (1996). The organizational climate of middle schools: The development and test of the OCDQ-RM. Journal of Educational Administration, 34, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoy, W. K., & Kupersmith, W. J. (1985). The meaning and measure of faculty trust. Educational and Psychological Research, 5, 1–10.Google Scholar
  23. Hoy, W. K., Smith, P. A., & Sweetland, S. R. (2002). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: Its measure and relationship to faculty trust. The High School Journal, 86, 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools, healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Witkoskie, L. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26, 40–47.Google Scholar
  26. Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184–208Google Scholar
  27. Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools: The omnibus T-scale. In W. Hoy & C. Miskel, (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing school, (pp. 181–208). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson-George, C. E., & Swap, W. C. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1306–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kee, H. W., & Knox, R. E. (1970). Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Reviews: Psychology, 50, 569–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 114–139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Lieberman, J. K. (1981). The litigious society. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations (pp. 261–287). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. O’Reilly, C., Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21 – 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  40. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. D. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1996). Organizational trust: Philosophical perspectives and conceptual definitions. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.Google Scholar
  43. Shoho, A. R., & Smith, P. A. (2004). An exploratory analysis of faculty trust in higher education. In W. K. Hoy, & C. G. Miskel (Series Eds.), Educational administration, policy, and reform: Research and measurement (pp. 279–303). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, P. A., & Birney, L. L. (2005). The organizational trust of elementary schools and dimensions of student bullying. The International Journal of Educational Management, 19, 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, P. A., Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2001). The organizational health of high schools and dimensions of faculty trust. Journal of School Leadership, 11, 135–150.Google Scholar
  46. Solomon, R. C., & Flores, F. (2001). Building trust in business, politics, relationships, and life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tarter, C. J., Bliss, J. R., & Hoy, W. K. (1989a). School characteristics and faculty trust in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tarter, C. J., Hoy, W. K., & Bliss, J. R. (1989b). Principal leadership and organizational commitment: The principal must deliver. Planning and Changing, 20, 129–140.Google Scholar
  49. Tarter, C. J., Sabo, D., & Hoy, W. K. (1995). Middle school climate, faculty trust, and effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 41–49.Google Scholar
  50. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 36, 334–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. United States Department of Education (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  52. Vitell, S. J., & Davis, D. L. (1990). The relationship between ethics and job satisfaction: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 489–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warren, M. (1999). Democracy and trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Leadership & Policy StudiesUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations