Advertisement

Differential impacts of public health insurance expansions at the local level

  • Reagan Baughman
Article

Abstract

Dramatic expansions in public health insurance eligibility for U.S. children have only modestly reduced the aggregate number of uninsured at the national level. This paper shows that Medicaid and SCHIP expansions had different impacts on child health insurance coverage patterns based upon local labor market characteristics. Metropolitan areas with high levels of unemployment were most likely to have seen improvements in overall insurance coverage for children between 1990 and 2001. Areas with greater fractions of employment in services, retail or wholesale trade were more likely to have experienced increases in public coverage but not overall coverage rates.

Keywords

Health insurance Labor markets Unemployment Medicaid SCHIP 

JEL Classifications

I1 H7 

References

  1. Ai C., Norton E.C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters 80: 123–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizer, A. (forthcoming). Public health insurance, program take-up and child health. Review of Economics and StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumberg L.J., Dubay L., Norton S.A. (2000). Did the medicaid expansions for children displace private insurance? an analysis using the SIPP. Journal of Health Economics 19, 33–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Card D., Shore-Sheppard L. (2004). Using discontinuous eligibility rules to identify the effects of federal medicaid expansions on low income children. Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 752–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham P.J., Ginsburg P.B. (2001). What accounts for differences in uninsurance rates across communities?. Inquiry 38, 6–21Google Scholar
  6. Currie J., Gruber J. (1996) Health insurance eligibility, utilization of medical care and child health. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 431–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutler D.M., Gruber J. (1996). Does public insurance crowd out private insurance? Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 391–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldstein, G., & Pauly, M. V. (1976). Group health insurance as a local public good. In R. Rossett, (Ed), The role of health insurance in the health servicessector. New York: Neale Watson Academic Publications for the National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  9. Kenney, G., Haley, J. M., & Tebay, A. (2003). Children’s insurance coverage an service use improve. Snapshots of America’s Families III, No. 1. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Marquis M.S., Long S.H. (2002). Employer health insurance and local labor market conditions. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics 1, 273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. National Governor’s Association. (Various years). “Maternal and child health updates: State coverage of pregnant women and children. Washington, DC: National Governor’s Association.Google Scholar
  12. Remler D.K., Glied S.A. (2003). What other programs can teach us: Increasing participation in health insurance programs. American Journal of Public Health 93, 67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Selden T.M., Banthin J.S., Cohen J.W. (1998). Medicaid’s problem children: Eligible but not enrolled. Health Affairs 17, 192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thorpe K.E., Florence C.S. (1998). Health insurance among children: The role of expanded medicaid coverage. Inquiry 35, 369–379Google Scholar
  15. U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Health insurance historical table H3: health insurance coverage status and type of coverage — children under 18 by age: 1987 to 2002. Accessed 12/8/03 at http://www.census.gov/hhes/hlthins/historic.Google Scholar
  16. U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2003). Regional economic information system: 1969–2001. (CD ROM) RCN 0316. May.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Whittemore School of Business & EconomicsUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations