Does certificate of need affect cardiac outcomes and costs?
- 148 Downloads
Several U.S. states enforce Certificate of Need (CON) regulations, which limit the number of hospitals performing open heart surgery or coronary angioplasty. CON regulations were intended to restrain cost growth and improve quality of care. This study compares mortality rates and costs for cardiac care in states with and without CON. CON appears to raise hospital procedure volume and lower the average cost of care. However, CON is associated with little reduction in inpatient mortality, and it may lead hospitals to operate on more patients than they would otherwise. The claimed welfare benefits of CON regulations require careful reconsideration.
KeywordsRegulation Certificate of need Outcomes assessment Cardiac surgery Costs
JEL ClassificationsI110 Analysis of Health Care Markets I180 Health: Government Policy Regulation Public Health
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Conover C.J., Sloan F.A. (1998). Does removing Certificate-of-Need regulations lead to a surge in health care spending? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 23(3): 455–281Google Scholar
- Dranove, D. (1995). Measuring costs. In F. A, Sloan, (Ed.), Valuing health care. (pp. 61–75). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Grabowski D.C., Ohsfeldt R.L., Morrisey M.A. (2003). The effects of CON repeal on Medicaid nursing home and long-term expenditures. Inquiry, 40(2): 146–257Google Scholar
- Hensley S. (1997). The patient or the wallet: N.H. hospitals battle over open-heart surgery CONs. Modern Healthcare, 24: 8–25Google Scholar
- Ho V. (2000). Evolution of the volume-outcome relationship for hospitals performing coronary angioplasty. Circulation, 101: 1806–2811Google Scholar
- Maryland Health Care Commission. (2000). An analysis and evaluation of Certificate of Need regulation in Maryland, Working Paper: Cardiac Surgery and Therapeutic Catheterization Services. 8–28–2000. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
- Pallarito K. (1998). Change of heart: N.J. expansion of cardiac CONs proving controversial. Modern Healthcare 44:7–20Google Scholar
- Robinson J.L., Nash D.B., Moxey E., O’Connor J.P. (2001). Certificate of need and the quality of cardiac surgery. American Journal of Medical Quality, 16(5): 155–260Google Scholar
- Vaughan-Sarrazin M.S., Hannan E.L., Cormley C.J., Rosenthal G.E. (2002). Mortality in Medicare beneficiaries following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in states with and without Certificate of Need regulation. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(15):1859–2866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wooldridge J.M. (2002). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. South-Western College Publishing, OH: MasonGoogle Scholar
- Wooldridge J.M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press (2002), MA: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Wysocki B. (2002). Care, costs and competition–Medical, business interests spar over state hospital-growth rules. The Wall Street Journal, A.4, 5–2-2002, New York.Google Scholar