Advertisement

Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 158, Issue 1–4, pp 229–233 | Cite as

Magnetic Hyperfine Interaction of a Cubic Defect in α-Iron

  • The Isolde Collaboration
  • S. Unterricker
  • V. Samokhvalov
  • F. Schneider
  • M. Dietrich
Magnetism and Magnetic Materials - Bulk and thin Layers
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

PAC measurements on 111In(111Cd) implanted and thermally treated α-Fe have shown an indication for a cubic defect with the 111Cd probe in the centre of it. The measured room temperature (R. T.) magnetic hyperfine fields are B hf1 = −38.4(8) T for substitution and B hf2 = +11.5(3) T for the cubic defect. Additionally, probes with pure quadrupole frequency distributions were observed, which are incorporated in surface contaminations.

Key Words

α-Fe cubic defect implantation magnetic hyperfine field PAC 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aspacher B., Frank W., Kizler P. and Maier K., Appl. Phys. A59 (1994), 339.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pleiter F. and Hohenemser C., Phys. Rev. B25 (1982), 106.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pleiter F., Hohenemser C. and Arends A. R., Hyperfine Interact. 10 (1981), 691.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Golcewski J. and Maier K., Nucl. Instrum., Methods Phys. Res. A244 (1986), 509.ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blaha P., Schwarz K. and Luitz J., WIEN97, 1999, ISBN 3-9501031-0-4.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Potzger K., Weber A., Bertschat H. H., Zeitz W.-D. and Dietrich M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), 247201.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • The Isolde Collaboration
    • 1
  • S. Unterricker
    • 2
  • V. Samokhvalov
    • 2
  • F. Schneider
    • 2
  • M. Dietrich
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut für Angewandte PhysikTU Bergakademie FreibergFreiberg (Sachsen)Germany
  2. 2.Technische PhysikUniversität des SaarlandesSaarbrückenGermany
  3. 3.CERNGeneva 23Switzerland

Personalised recommendations