Lake size, macrophytes, and omnivory contribute to food web linkage in temperate shallow eutrophic lakes

  • M. A. González Sagrario
  • D. Rodríguez Golpe
  • L. La Sala
  • G. Sánchez Vuichard
  • P. Minotti
  • H. O. Panarello
Primary Research Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Physical, chemical and biological processes facilitate cross-habitat connections in lakes, prompting food webs to be supported by different subsidies. We tested the hypothesis that the pelagic food web is subsidized by littoral resources and fish foraging behaviour plays a major role in carbon flux and on food web structure in shallow hypereutrophic lakes. We performed a fish diet and carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses to predict the linkage between littoral and pelagic habitats in three shallow hypereutrophic lakes. Lakes differed in morphology, fetch, macrophyte composition and width of the littoral zone. δ13C signals of seston differed among lakes, but were similar to other producers. Macroinvertebrates and fish carbon signatures were more enriched in the lake co-dominated by emergent and submerged vegetation. Fish foraging behaviour indicates that more than the 80% of the carbon that sustain adult fish was channelled from the littoral. In conclusion, littoral carbon were relevant and sustain, in part, food web in these shallow lakes. Factors like the extension of the littoral zone, lake morphometry, and the dominance of multi-chain omnivorous fish facilitate the connection among lake compartments and the transference of littoral carbon to lake food web.

Keywords

Carbon stable isotope Nitrogen stable isotopes Fish Macroinvertebrates 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments that have improved our manuscript, R. Inger (University of Exeter) for the valuable discussion and help with SIAR, M. Vanni (Miami University) for sharing his original data of fish carbon content, G. Bernava (IIMYC-CONICET/UNMDP) for technical assistance, and E. Ducos (INGEIS-CONICET/UBA) who performed the isotope analysis. We acknowledged the landowners and managers for their permission and assistance to enter to the private lands where the lakes are located, especially to P. Urrutia, H. Sanabria and González Aguilar family. This research was supported by the Agencia de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 384), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET) (PIP 1328, 465), and Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (EXA 418-08 y EXA 529-10). M.A.G.S.& H.P. are CONICET researchers.

References

  1. Ahlgren, M. O. & S. H. Bowen, 1992. Comparison of quantitative light microscopy techniques used in diet studies of detritus-consuming omnivores. Hydrobiologia 239: 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aichner, B., U. Herzschuh & H. Wilkes, 2010. Influence of aquatic macrophytes on the stable carbon isotopic signatures of sedimentary organic matter in lakes on the Tibetan Plateau. Organic Geochemistry 41: 706–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allende, L., G. Tell, H. Zagarese, A. Torremorell, G. Pérez, J. Bustingorry, R. Escaray & I. Izaguirre, 2009. Phytoplankton and primary production in clear-vegetated, inorganic-turbid, and algal-turbid shallow lakes from the pampa plain (Argentina). Hydrobiologia 624: 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen, T. & D. O. Hessen, 1991. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of freshwater zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 36: 807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apha, 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  6. Attayde, J. L. & J. R. Ripa, 2008. The coupling between grazing and detritus food chains and the strength of trophic cascades across a gradient of nutrient enrichment. Ecosystems 11: 980–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benke, A. C., A. D. Huryn, L. A. Smock & J. B. Wallace, 1999. Length-mass relationships for freshwater macroinvertebrates in North America with particular reference to the Southeastern United States. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 308–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohn, V. Y., G. M. Perillo & M. C. Piccolo, 2011. Distribution and morphometry of shallow lakes in temparate zone (Buenos Aires Province, Argentina). Limnetica 30: 89–102.Google Scholar
  9. Bottrell, H. H., A. Duncan, Z. M. Gliwicz, E. Grygierek, A. Herzig, A. Hillbricht-Ilkowska, H. Kurasawa, P. Larsson & T. Weglenska, 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 24: 419–456.Google Scholar
  10. Bowen, S. H., 1979. A nutritional constraint in detritivory by fishes: the stunted population of Sarotherodon mossambicus in Lake Sibaya, South Africa. Ecological Monographs 49: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colautti, D., C. Baigún, F. Llompart, T. Maiztegui, J. Garcia De Souza, P. Solimano, L. Balboni & G. Berasain, 2015. Fish assemblage of a Pampean shallow lake, a story of instability. Hydrobiologia 752: 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colautti, D. C., 1998. Design and handling of fish traps in shallow ponds of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Revista de Ictiología 6: 17–23.Google Scholar
  13. Coplen, T. B., H. R. Krouse & J. K. Bohlke, 1992. Reporting of nitrogen-isotope abundances. Pure & Applied Chemistry 64: 907–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Córdoba, F., 2012. El registro Climático del Holoceno Tardío en Latitudes Medias del SE de Sudamérica: Limnogeología de las Lagunas Encadenadas del Oeste. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.Google Scholar
  15. Crawley, M. J., 2007. The R Book. Wiley, West Sussex.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Brabandere, L., T. K. Frazer & J. P. Montoya, 2007. Stable nitrogen isotope ratios of macrophytes and associated periphyton along a nitrate gradient in two subtropical, spring-fed streams. Freshwater Biology 52: 1564–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dionne, M., M. Butler & C. Folt, 1990. Plant-specific expression of antipredator behaviour by larval damselflies. Oecologia 83: 371–377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Diovisalvi, N., V. Y. Bohn, M. C. Piccolo, G. M. E. Perillo, C. Baigún & H. E. Zagarese, 2015. Shallow lakes from the Central Plains of Argentina: an overview and worldwide comparative analysis of their basic limnological features. Hydrobiologia 752: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dolson, R., K. Mccann, N. Rooney & M. Ridgway, 2009. Lake morphometry predicts the degree of habitat coupling by a mobile predator. Oikos 118: 1230–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dumont, H. J., I. Van De Velde & S. Dumont, 1975. The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia 19: 75–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fee, E. J., R. E. Hecky, S. E. M. Kasian & D. R. Cruikshank, 1996. Effects of lake size, water clarity, and climatic variability on mixing depths in Canadian Shield lakes. Limnology and Oceanography 41: 912–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fellerhoff, C., M. Voss & K. M. Wantzen, 2003. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures of decomposing tropical macrophytes. Aquatic Ecology 37: 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. France, R. L., 2012. Omnivory, vertical food-web structure and system productivity: stable isotope analysis of freshwater planktonic food webs. Freshwater Biology 57: 787–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. France, R. L., P. A. Del Giorgio & K. A. Westcott, 1997. Productivity and heterotrophy influences on zooplankton delta13C in northern temperate lakes. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 12: 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frost, P. C., S. E. Tank, M. A. Turner & J. J. Elser, 2003. Elemental composition of littoral invertebrates from oligotrophic and eutrophic Canadian Lakes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goericke, R., J. P. Montoya & B. Fry, 1994. Physiology of isotopic fractionation in algae and cyanobacteria. In Goericke, R., J. P. Montoya & B. Fry (eds), Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental Sciences. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston: 187–229.Google Scholar
  27. Gonfiantini, R., 1978. Standards for stable isotope measurements in natural compounds. Nature 271: 534–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. González Sagrario, M. A. & E. Balseiro, 2010. The role of macroinvertebrates and fish in regulating the provision by macrophytes of refugia for zooplankton in a warm temperate shallow lake. Freshwater Biology 55: 2153–2166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. González Sagrario, M. A. & L. Ferrero, 2013. The trophic role of Cyphocharax voga (Hensel, 1869) according to habitat foraging and diet analysis in two turbid shallow lakes. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 183: 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grey, J., R. I. Jones & D. Sleep, 2000. Stable isotope analysis of the origins of zooplankton carbon in lakes of differing trophic state. Oecologia 123: 232–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Grey, J., R. I. Jones & D. Sleep, 2001. Seasonal changes in the importance of the source of organic matter to the diet of zooplankton in Loch Ness, as indicated by stable isotope analysis. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herman, P. M. J. & C. Heip, 1982. Growth and respiration of Cyprideis torosa Jones 1850 (Crustacea Ostracoda). Oecologia 54: 300–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Herwig, B. R., D. A. Soluk, J. M. Dettmers & D. H. Wahl, 2004. Trophic structure and energy flow in backwater lakes of two large floodplain rivers assessed using stable isotopes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Izaguirre, I., M. L. Sánchez, M. R. Schiaffino, I. O’farrell, P. Huber, J. Zunino, L. Lagomarsino & M. Mancini, 2015. Which environmental factors trigger the dominance of phytoplankton species across a moisture gradient of shallow lakes? Hydrobiologia 752: 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, J. I. & S. Waldron, 2003. Combined stable isotope and gut contents analysis of food webs in plant-dominated, shallow lakes. Freshwater Biology 48: 1396–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keeley, J. E. & D. R. Sandquist, 1992. Carbon: freshwater plants. Plant Cell and Environment 15: 1021–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kosten, S., M. Vernooij, E. H. Van Nes, M. A. González Sagrario, J. G. P. W. A. Clevers & M. Scheffer, 2012. Bimodal transparency as an indicator for alternative states in South American lakes. Freshwater Biology 57: 1191–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, J.-Y., J.-K. Kim, J. S. Owen, Y. Choi, K. Shin, S. Jung & B. Kim, 2013. Variation in carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in POM and zooplankton in a deep reservoir and relationship to hydrological characteristics. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 28: 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lorenzen, C. J., 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and pheo-pigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnology and Oceanography 12: 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mcintyre, P. B., A. S. Flecker, M. J. Vanni, J. M. Hood, B. W. Taylor & S. A. Thomas, 2008. Fish distributions and nutrient cycling in streams: can fish create biogeochemical hotspots. Ecology 89: 2335–2346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mendonça, R., S. Kosten, G. Lacerot, N. Mazzeo, F. Roland, J. P. Ometto, E. Paz, C. P. Bove, N. C. Bueno, J. H. C. Gomes & M. Scheffer, 2013. Bimodality in stable isotope composition facilitates the tracing of carbon transfer from macrophytes to higher trophic levels. Hydrobiologia 710: 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moss, B., 2007. The art and science of lake restoration. Hydrobiologia 581: 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oksanen, L., S. D. Fretwell, J. Arruda & P. Niemela, 1981. Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. The American Naturalist 118: 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osmond, C. B., N. Valaane, S. M. Haslam, P. Uotila & Z. Roksandic, 1981. Comparisons of δ13C values in leaves of quatic macrophytes from different habitats in Britain and Finland; some implications for photosynthetic processes in aquatic plants. Oecologia 50: 117–124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Parnell, A. C., R. Inger, S. Bearhop & A. L. Jackson, 2010. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation. PLoS ONE 5: e9672.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Polis, G. A., W. B. Anderson & R. D. Holt, 1997. Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Post, M. P., 2002. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83: 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quirós, R., A. M. Rennella, M. B. Boveri, J. J. Rosso & A. Sosnovsky, 2002. Factores que afectan la estructura y funcionamiento de las lagunas pampeanas. Ecologia Austral 12: 175–185.Google Scholar
  49. Read, J. S. & K. C. Rose, 2013. Physical responses of small temperate lakes to variation in dissolved organic carbon concentrations. Limnology and Oceanography 58: 921–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rowland, F. E., K. J. Bricker, M. J. Vanni & M. J. González, 2015. Light and nutrients regulate energy transfer through benthic and pelagic food chains. Oikos 124: 1648–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saigo, M., M. R. Marchese & K. M. Wantzen, 2016. Sources contribution for benthic invertebrates: an inter-lake comparison in a flood plain system. Hydrobiologia 770: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schindler, D. E. & M. D. Scheuerell, 2002. Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems. Oikos 98: 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Small, G. E., C. M. Pringle, M. Pyron & J. H. Duff, 2010. Role of the fish Astyanax aeneus (Characidae) as a keystone nutrient recycler in low-nutrient Neotropical streams. Ecology 92: 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Solomon, C. T., S. R. Carpenter, M. K. Clayton, J. J. Cole, J. J. Coloso, M. L. Pace, M. J. Vander Zanden & B. C. Weidel, 2011. Terrestrial, benthic, and pelagic resource use in lakes: results from a three-isotope Bayesian mixing model. Ecology 92: 1115–1125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Stenroth, P., N. Holmqvist, P. Nyström, O. Berglund, P. Larsson & W. Granéli, 2008. The influence of productivity and width of littoral zone on the trophic position of a large-bodied omnivore. Oecologia 156: 681–690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Teixeira-De Mello, F., M. Meerhoff, Z. Pekcan-Hekim & E. Jeppesen, 2009. Substantial differences in littoral fish community structure and dynamics in subtropical and temperate shallow lakes. Freshwater Biology 54: 1202–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vadeboncoeur, Y., K. S. Mccann, M. J. Vanderzanden & J. B. Rasmussen, 2005. Effects of multi-chain omnivory on the strength of trophic control in lakes. Ecosystems 8: 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vadeboncoeur, Y., G. Peterson, M. J. Vander Zanden & J. Kalff, 2008. Benthic algal production across lake size gradients: interactions among morphometry, nutrients and light. Ecology 89: 2542–2552.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Valderrama, J. C., 1981. The simultaneous analysis of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in natural waters. Marine Chemistry 10: 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vander Zanden, M. J. & Y. Vadeboncoeur, 2002. Fishes as integrators of benthic and pelagic food webs in lakes. Ecology 83: 2152–2161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vander Zanden, M. J., Y. Vadeboncoeur & S. Chandra, 2011. Fish reliance on littoral–benthic resources and the distribution of primary production in lakes. Ecosystems 14: 894–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vanni, M. J., G. Boros & P. B. Mcintyre, 2013. When are fish sources vs. sinks of nutrients in lake ecosystems? Ecology 94: 2195–2206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Vanni, M. J., A. M. Bowling, E. M. Dickman, R. S. Hale, K. A. Higgins, M. J. Horgan, L. B. Knoll, W. H. Renwick & R. A. Stein, 2006. Nutrient cycling by fish supports relatively more primary production as lake productivity increases. Ecology 87: 1696–1709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Vanni, M. J., A. S. Flecker, J. M. Hood & J. L. Headworth, 2002. Stoichiometry of nutrient recycling by vertebrates in a tropical stream: linking species identity and ecosystem processes. Ecology Letters 5: 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wetzel, R. G. & G. E. Likens, 1991. Limnological Analyses. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilkinson, G. M., S. R. Carpenter, J. J. Cole, M. L. Pace & C. Yang, 2013. Terrestrial support of pelagic consumers: patterns and variability revealed by a multilake study. Freshwater Biology 58: 2037–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Winemiller, K. O., 1990. Spatial and temporal variation in tropical fish trophic networks. Ecological Monographs 60: 331–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang, H., G. Wu, P. Zhang & J. Xu, 2013. Trophic fingerprint of fish communities in subtropical floodplain lakes. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 22: 246–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC)UNMDP-CONICETMar del PlataArgentina
  2. 2.Dpto. Biología, FCEyNUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataMar del PlataArgentina
  3. 3.Instituto de Investigación e Ingeniería AmbientalUniversidad Nacional de San MartínSan MartínArgentina
  4. 4.Instituto de Geocronología y Geología Isotópica (INGEIS), CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires, Pabellón INGEIS - Ciudad Universitaria, (C1428EHA)Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations