Response of crayfish to hyporheic water availability and excess sedimentation
- 274 Downloads
Crayfish in many headwater streams regularly cope with seasonal drought. However, it is unclear how landscape changes affect the long-term persistence of crayfish populations. We designed two laboratory experiments to investigate the acute effects of common landscape stressors on crayfish: water withdrawal and sedimentation. The first experiment tested the interaction among water withdrawals (four 24-h water reductions of 0, 15, 30, or 45 cm) and two substrate treatments (pebble and cobble) on the burrowing depth of crayfish. The second experiment evaluated the effects of excess fine sediment (three treatments of 0, 45, and 90% sediment) and substrate type (cobble and pebble) on crayfish burrowing depth. Crayfish were able to burrow deeper into the simulated hyporheic zone in cobble substrate when compared to pebble. Crayfish subjected to greater water withdrawals in the pebble treatment were not able to reach the simulated hyporheic zone. Excess fine sediment reduced the depth that crayfish burrowed, regardless of substrate type. Results from this study suggest excess fine sediment may reduce crayfish persistence, particularly when seeking refuge during prolonged dry conditions.
KeywordsStream drying Fine sediment Substrate Land use
This research is a contribution of the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit (U.S. Geological Survey, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Oklahoma State University, and Wildlife Management Institute cooperating). Funding was provided by the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation (F11AF00031). We thank Michi Tobler for the thoughtful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
- Allen, K. R., 1959. The distribution of stream bottom faunas. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 6: 5–8.Google Scholar
- Benjamini, Y. & Y. Hochberg, 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 57: 289–300.Google Scholar
- Brewer, S. K. & J. J. Dyer, 2014. The impacts of flow alterations to crayfishes in southeastern Oklahoma, with an emphasis on the Mena crayfish (Orconectes menae). U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Cooperator Science Series FWS/CSS-105-2014, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Brewer, S. K. & D. J. Orth, 2015. Smallmouth bass. In Tringali, M. D., M. S. Allen, T. Birdsong, & J. M. Long (eds), Proceedings of the Symposium Black Bass Diversity: Multidisciplinary Science for Conservation. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 82, Bethesda, MD (in press).Google Scholar
- DiStefano, R., 2005. A Program Plan for Conservation and Management of Missouri’s Non-cave Dwelling Crayfish Resources. Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
- Fournier, D. A., H. J. Skaug, J. Ancheta, J. Ianelli, A. Magnusson, M. N. Maunder, A. Nielsen & J. Sibert, 2012. AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models. Optimization Methods and Software 27: 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fox, J. & S. Weisberg, 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
- Gherardi, F., 2002. Behaviour. In Holdich, D. M. (ed.), Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Blackwell Science Ltd, London: 258–290.Google Scholar
- Huner, J. V., 1989. Survival of red swamp and white-river crayfish under simulated burrow conditions. Crawfish Tales 8: 29.Google Scholar
- Malcolm, I. A., S. M. Greig, A. F. Youngson & C. Soulsby, 2008. Hyporheic influences on salmon embryo survival and performance. In Sear, D. A. & P. Devries (eds), Salmonid Spawning Habitat in Rivers: Physical Controls, Biological Responses, and Approaches to Remediation. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 65, Bethesda, MD: 1–24.Google Scholar
- McMahon, T. A., 2002. Physiological adaptation to environment. In Holdich, D. M. (ed.), Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Blackwell Science Ltd, London: 327–376.Google Scholar
- McMahon, B. R. & S. A. Stuart, 1999. Haemolymph gas exchange and ionic and acid-base regulation during long-term air exposure an aquatic recovery in Procambarus clarkii. Freshwater Crayfish 12: 134–153.Google Scholar
- R Core Team, 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.Org/.
- Richards, C. & K. L. Bacon, 1994. Influence of fine sediment on macroinvertebrate colonization of surface and hyporheic stream substrate. Great Basin Naturalist 54: 106–113.Google Scholar
- Sala, O. E., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L. F. Huenneke, R. B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D. M. Lodge, H. A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N. L. Poff, M. T. Sykes, B. H. Walker, M. Walker & D. H. Wall, 2000. Biodiversity—global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Waters, T. F., 1995. Sediment in Streams: Source Biological Effects and Control. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar