, Volume 744, Issue 1, pp 271–286 | Cite as

Loss of seasonal variability in nekton community structure in a tidal river: evidence for homogenization in a flow-altered system

  • Jill A. Olin
  • Philip W. Stevens
  • Scott A. Rush
  • Nigel E. Hussey
  • Aaron T. Fisk
Primary Research Paper


Modifications to riverine systems that alter freshwater inflow to downstream estuarine habitats have resulted in altered patterns of nekton distribution and abundance. To examine how nekton assemblages respond to variable hydrologic patterns, we used trawl and seine survey data to compare the seasonal trends (dry vs. wet season) expected of a natural system to those of a river with regulated flow discharges that often magnify high flow events. Nekton assemblages differed between seasons in a representative natural system, similar to other estuaries of the region. For example, assemblage differences were characterized by significantly higher abundance and richness in trawl surveys, and significantly higher richness in seine surveys in the wet relative to the dry season. These seasonal trends were dampened in the altered system. Species important in defining seasonal dissimilarities in both systems were characterized as estuarine resident species, including Anchoa mitchilli, Menidia spp., Cynoscion arenarius, and Trinectes maculatus, yet were observed largely to have opposing seasonal trends in abundance between the two rivers. Our comparison provides evidence that flow modifications result in a loss of natural seasonal variability in estuarine nekton assemblages, but additional investigations of flow-altered systems are needed to confirm these findings.


Caloosahatchee River Density Disturbance Estuarine High flow Myakka River 



The authors thank the staff of the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission’s Charlotte Harbor Field Laboratory for sample collection and logistics. Comments from two anonymous reviewers improved the quality of this manuscript. Field sampling was supported by the South Florida Water Management District (CP040063), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coastal Management Program (CZ906), funds collected from the state of Florida saltwater fishing license sales, and the Department of the Interior, US Fish & Wildlife Service Federal Aid for Sport Fish Restoration Grant Number F-43. Additional support was provided through University of Windsor scholarships to J.A. Olin and Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Discovery grant funds to A.T. Fisk.


  1. Adams, A. J., R. K. Wolfe & C. A. Layman, 2009. Preliminary examination of how human-driven freshwater flow alteration affects trophic ecology of juvenile snook (Centropomus undecimalis) in estuarine creeks. Estuaries and Coasts 32: 819–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, D. M., S. S. Haertel-Borer, B. J. Milan, D. Bushek & R. F. Dame, 2007. Geomorphological determinants of nekton use of intertidal salt marsh creeks. Marine Ecology Progress Series 329: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baptista, J., F. Martinho, M. Dolbeth, I. Viegas, H. Cabral, et al., 2010. Effects of freshwater flow on the fish assemblage of the Mondego estuary (Portugal): comparison between drought and non-drought years. Marine and Freshwater Research 61: 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, T., 2005. Caloosahatchee Estuary conceptual ecological model. Wetlands 25: 884–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, D. & M. Maechler, 2010. Linear mixed-effects models using S4 class in R. package versionGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunn, S. E. & A. H. Arthington, 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30: 492–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrnes, J. E., D. C. Reed, B. J. Cardinale, K. C. Cavanaugh, S. J. Holbrook, et al., 2011. Climate-driven increases in storm frequency simplify kelp forest food webs. Global Change Biology 17: 2513–2524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chamberlain, R. H. & P.H. Doering, 1998. Freshwater inflow to the Caloosahatchee estuary and the resource-based method for evaluation. In S.F. Treat (ed.), Proceedings of the 1997 Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium, South Florida Water Management District and Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Technical Report No. 98-02. Washington, D.C.: 81–90Google Scholar
  9. Costa, M. J., R. Vasconcelos, J. L. Costa & H. N. Cabral, 2007. River flow influence on the fish community of the Tagus estuary (Portugal). Hydrobiologia 587: 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doering, P.H. & R.H. Chamberlain, 1998. Water quality in the Caloosahatchee Estuary, San Carlos Bay and Pine Island Sound. In: Proceedings of the Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium, Technical Report No. 98-02, Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Punta Gorda, FL: 229–240.Google Scholar
  11. Doering, P. H., R. H. Chamberlain & D. E. Haunert, 2002. Using submerged aquatic vegetation to establish minimum and maximum freshwater inflows to the Caloosahatchee estuary, Florida. Estuaries 25: 1343–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drinkwater, K. F. & K. T. Frank, 1994. Effect of river regulation and diversion on marine fish and invertebrates. Aquatic Conservation-Marine & Freshwater Ecosystems 4: 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott, M., A. K. Whitfield, I. C. Potter, S. J. M. Blaber, D. P. Cyrus, et al., 2007. The guild approach to categorizing estuarine fish assemblages: a global review. Fish and Fisheries 8: 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flaig, E.G. & J. Capece, 1998. Water use and runoff in the Caloosahatchee watershed. In: Proceedings of the Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium, Technical Report No. 98-02, Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Punta Gorda, FL, 73–80.Google Scholar
  15. Gillson, J., I. Suthers & J. Scandol, 2012. Effects of flood and drought events on multi-species, multi-method estuarine and coastal fisheries in eastern Australia. Fisheries Management and Ecology 19: 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillson, J., 2011. Freshwater flow and fisheries production in estuarine and coastal systems: where a drop of rain is not lost. Reviews in Fisheries Science 19: 168–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenwood, M. F. D., R. E. Matheson, R. H. McMichael & T. C. MacDonald, 2007. Community structure of shoreline nekton in the estuarine portion of the Alafia River, Florida: differences along a salinity gradient and inflow-related changes. Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Science 74: 23–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenwood, M. F. D., P. W. Stevens & R. E. Matheson, 2006. Effects of the 2004 hurricanes on the fish assemblages in two proximate southwest Florida estuaries: changes in the context of inter-annual variability. Estuaries and Coasts 29: 985–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guenther, C. B. & T. C. MacDonald, 2012. Comparison of estuarine salinity gradients and associated nekton community change in the lower St. Johns River Estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 35: 1443–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Idelberger, C. F. & M. F. D. Greenwood, 2005. Seasonal variation in fish assemblages within the estuarine portions of the Myakka and Peace Rivers, Southwest Florida. Gulf of Mexico Science 2: 224–240.Google Scholar
  21. Idelberger, C. F., C. J. Stafford & S. E. Erickson, 2011. Distribution and abundance of introduced fishes in Florida’s Charlotte Harbor Estuary. Gulf and Caribbean Research 23: 13–22.Google Scholar
  22. Jenkins, G. P., S. D. Conron & A. K. Morison, 2010. Highly variable recruitment in an estuarine fish is determined by salinity stratification and freshwater flow: implications of a changing climate. Marine Ecology Progress Series 417: 246–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly, M. H. & J. A. Gore, 2008. Florida river flow patterns and the Atlantic multi-decadal oscillation. River Research and Applications 24: 598–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kimmerer, W. J., 2002. Effects of freshwater flow on abundance of estuarine organisms: physical effects or trophic linkages? Marine Ecology Progress Series 243: 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kraus, R. & D. H. Secor, 2004. Dynamics of white perch (Morone americana) population contingents in the Patuxent River estuary, Maryland USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 279: 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Layman, C. A., J. P. Quattrochi, C. M. Peyer & J. E. Allgeier, 2007. Niche width collapse in a resilient top predator following ecosystem fragmentation. Ecology Letters 10: 937–944.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Livingston, R. J., X. Niu, G. Lewis & G. C. Woodsum, 1997. Freshwater input to a gulf estuary: long-term control of trophic organization. Ecological Applications 7: 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lytle, D. A. & N. L. Poff, 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regime. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 94–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayer, P. M. & S. M. Galatowitsch, 2001. Assessing ecosystem integrity of restored prairie wetlands from species production-diversity relationships. Hydrobiologia 443: 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLeod, R. J. & S. R. Wing, 2008. Influence of altered salinity regime on the population structure of two infaunal bivalve species. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 78: 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morgan, R. P. & S. F. Cushman, 2005. Urbanization effects on stream fish assemblages in Maryland, USA. Journal of North American Benthological Society 24: 643–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, et al., 2004. Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Committee on Names of Fishes, 6th ed. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  33. Nilsson, C., C. A. Reidy, M. Dynesius & C. Revenga, 2005. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308: 405–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oksanen, J., 2011. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial.Google Scholar
  35. Olin, J. A., N. E. Hussey, S. A. Rush, G. R. Poulakis, C. A. Simpfendorfer, et al., 2013. Seasonal variability in stable isotopes of estuarine consumers under different freshwater flow regimes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 487: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmer, T. A., P. A. Montagna, J. B. Pollack, R. D. Kalke & H. R. DeYoe, 2011. The role of freshwater inflow in lagoons, rivers and bays. Hydrobiologia 667: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perry, W., 2004. Elements of South Florida’s comprehensive everglades restoration plan. Ecotoxicology 13: 185–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peterson, M. S. & S. T. Ross, 1991. Dynamics of littoral fishes and decapods along a coastal river–estuarine gradient. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 33: 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Piazza, B. P. & M. K. La Peyre, 2011. Nekton community response to a large-scale Mississippi River discharge: examining spatial and temporal response to river management. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 91: 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piazza, B. P. & M. K. La Peyre, 2012. Measuring changes in consumer resource availability to riverine pulsing in Breton Sound, Louisiana, USA. PLoS ONE 7(5): e37536.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Purtlebaugh, C. H. & M. S. Allen, 2010. Relative abundance, growth, and mortality of five age-0 estuarine fishes in relation to discharge of the Suwannee River, Florida. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139: 1233–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  43. Rooney, N., K. McCann, G. Gellner & J. C. Moore, 2006. Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature 442: 265–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rozas, L. P., T. J. Minello, R. J. Zimmerman & P. Caldwell, 2007. Nekton populations, long-term wetland loss, and the effect of recent habitat restoration in Galveston Bay, Texas, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 344: 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rutger, S. M. & S. R. Wing, 2006. Effects of freshwater input on shallow-water infaunal communities in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Marine Ecology Progress Series 314: 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rypel, A. L. & C. A. Layman, 2008. Degree of aquatic ecosystem fragmentation predicts population characteristics of gray snapper in Caribbean tidal creeks. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65: 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sheaves, M., R. Johnston & R. M. Connolly, 2010. Temporal dynamics of fish assemblages of natural and artificial tropical estuaries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 410: 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sklar, F. H. & J. A. Browder, 1998. Coastal environmental impacts brought about by alterations to freshwater flow in the Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Management 22: 547–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stevens, P. W., M. F. D. Greenwood, C. F. Idelberger & D. A. Blewett, 2010. Mainstem and backwater fish assemblages in the tidal Caloosahatchee River: implications for freshwater inflow studies. Estuaries and Coasts 5: 1216–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stevens, P. W., M. F. D. Greenwood & D. A. Blewett, 2013. Fish assemblages in the oligohaline stretch of a southwest Florida river during periods of extreme freshwater inflow variation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142: 1644–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tsou, T. S. & R. E. Matheson, 2002. Seasonal changes in the nekton community of the Suwannee River estuary and the potential impacts of freshwater withdrawal. Estuaries 25: 1372–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Visintainer, T. A., S. M. Bollens & C. S. Simenstad, 2006. Community composition and diet of fishes as a function of tidal channel geomorphology. Marine Ecology Progress Series 321: 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vörösmarty, C. J., P. Green, J. Salisbury & R. B. Lammers, 2000. Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289: 284–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walters, A. W. & D. M. Post, 2011. How low can you go? Impacts of low-flow disturbance on aquatic insect communities. Ecological Applications 21: 163–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walters, D. M., D. S. Leigh & A. B. Bearden, 2003. Urbanization, sedimentation, and the homogenization of fish assemblages in the Etowah River Basin, USA. Hydrobiologia 494: 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jill A. Olin
    • 1
    • 4
  • Philip W. Stevens
    • 2
  • Scott A. Rush
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nigel E. Hussey
    • 1
  • Aaron T. Fisk
    • 1
  1. 1.Great Lakes Institute for Environmental ResearchUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  2. 2.Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish & Wildlife Research InstituteCharlotte Harbor Field LaboratoryPort CharlotteUSA
  3. 3.Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & AquacultureMississippi State UniversityStarkvilleUSA
  4. 4.Department of Oceanography & Coastal SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations