Loss of seasonal variability in nekton community structure in a tidal river: evidence for homogenization in a flow-altered system
- 250 Downloads
Modifications to riverine systems that alter freshwater inflow to downstream estuarine habitats have resulted in altered patterns of nekton distribution and abundance. To examine how nekton assemblages respond to variable hydrologic patterns, we used trawl and seine survey data to compare the seasonal trends (dry vs. wet season) expected of a natural system to those of a river with regulated flow discharges that often magnify high flow events. Nekton assemblages differed between seasons in a representative natural system, similar to other estuaries of the region. For example, assemblage differences were characterized by significantly higher abundance and richness in trawl surveys, and significantly higher richness in seine surveys in the wet relative to the dry season. These seasonal trends were dampened in the altered system. Species important in defining seasonal dissimilarities in both systems were characterized as estuarine resident species, including Anchoa mitchilli, Menidia spp., Cynoscion arenarius, and Trinectes maculatus, yet were observed largely to have opposing seasonal trends in abundance between the two rivers. Our comparison provides evidence that flow modifications result in a loss of natural seasonal variability in estuarine nekton assemblages, but additional investigations of flow-altered systems are needed to confirm these findings.
KeywordsCaloosahatchee River Density Disturbance Estuarine High flow Myakka River
The authors thank the staff of the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission’s Charlotte Harbor Field Laboratory for sample collection and logistics. Comments from two anonymous reviewers improved the quality of this manuscript. Field sampling was supported by the South Florida Water Management District (CP040063), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coastal Management Program (CZ906), funds collected from the state of Florida saltwater fishing license sales, and the Department of the Interior, US Fish & Wildlife Service Federal Aid for Sport Fish Restoration Grant Number F-43. Additional support was provided through University of Windsor scholarships to J.A. Olin and Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Discovery grant funds to A.T. Fisk.
- Bates, D. & M. Maechler, 2010. Linear mixed-effects models using S4 class in R. package versionGoogle Scholar
- Chamberlain, R. H. & P.H. Doering, 1998. Freshwater inflow to the Caloosahatchee estuary and the resource-based method for evaluation. In S.F. Treat (ed.), Proceedings of the 1997 Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium, South Florida Water Management District and Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Technical Report No. 98-02. Washington, D.C.: 81–90Google Scholar
- Doering, P.H. & R.H. Chamberlain, 1998. Water quality in the Caloosahatchee Estuary, San Carlos Bay and Pine Island Sound. In: Proceedings of the Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium, Technical Report No. 98-02, Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Punta Gorda, FL: 229–240.Google Scholar
- Flaig, E.G. & J. Capece, 1998. Water use and runoff in the Caloosahatchee watershed. In: Proceedings of the Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium, Technical Report No. 98-02, Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Punta Gorda, FL, 73–80.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, M. F. D., R. E. Matheson, R. H. McMichael & T. C. MacDonald, 2007. Community structure of shoreline nekton in the estuarine portion of the Alafia River, Florida: differences along a salinity gradient and inflow-related changes. Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Science 74: 23–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Idelberger, C. F. & M. F. D. Greenwood, 2005. Seasonal variation in fish assemblages within the estuarine portions of the Myakka and Peace Rivers, Southwest Florida. Gulf of Mexico Science 2: 224–240.Google Scholar
- Idelberger, C. F., C. J. Stafford & S. E. Erickson, 2011. Distribution and abundance of introduced fishes in Florida’s Charlotte Harbor Estuary. Gulf and Caribbean Research 23: 13–22.Google Scholar
- Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, et al., 2004. Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Committee on Names of Fishes, 6th ed. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
- Oksanen, J., 2011. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar