Skip to main content
Log in

A food web analysis of the Río de la Plata estuary and adjacent shelf ecosystem: trophic structure, biomass flows, and the role of fisheries

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article performed a comprehensive assessment of the structure and functioning of the Río de la Plata estuary and adjacent shelf ecosystem, including the effect of fishing. A formerly implemented 37 trophic groups’ mass-balance model (Ecopath) was used to (1) evaluate the particular role of individual biotic components on the ecosystem; (2) characterize the ecosystem in terms of aquatic food web theory; and (3) assess the role of diverse fishing fleets on the ecosystem. Our results indicate a trophic structure and functioning common to other estuaries, where outstanding primary production exceeds consumption, and detritus accumulates in the system. Moreover, our analysis revealed an elevated total system throughput, herbivory outweighing detritivory, and an intermediate state in terms of ecosystem growth and development. Fisheries analyses showed widespread impacts produced by industrial bottom trawl fleets, and specific impacts produced by artisanal fisheries over several groups. Unexpectedly, the evaluation of the effects of fishing showed minor ecosystem consequences by the loss of secondary production and suggests exploitation rates at sustainable levels. This study sets up the basis for temporal ecosystem-level monitoring of the state of the Río de la Plata estuary and adjacent shelf ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abud, C., C. Dimitriadis, P. Laporta & M. Lázaro, 2006. La franciscana Pontoporia blainvillei en la costa uruguaya: estudios regionales y perspectivas para su conservación. In Menafra, R., L. Rodríguez-Gallego, F. Scarabino & D. Conde (eds), Bases para la conservación y el manejo de la costa uruguaya. Vida Silvestre, Montevideo: 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergamino, L., D. Szteren & D. Lercari, 2012. Trophic impacts of marine mammals and seabirds in the Río de la Plata estuary and the nearshore oceanic ecosystem. Estuaries and Coasts 35: 1571–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botto, F., E. Gaitán, H. Mianzan, M. Acha, D. Giberto, A. Schiariti & O. Iribarne, 2011. Origin of resources and trophic pathways in a large SW Atlantic estuary: an evaluation using stable isotopes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 92: 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodziak, J. & J. Link, 2002. Ecosystem-based fishery management: what is it and how can we do it? Bulletin of Marine Science 70: 589–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calliari, D., M. Gómez & N. Gómez, 2005. Biomass and composition of the phytoplankton in the Río de la Plata: large-scale distribution and relationship with environmental variables during a spring cruise. Continental Shelf Research 25: 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calliari, D., E. Brugnoli, G. Ferrari & D. Vizziano, 2009. Phytoplankton distribution and production along a wide environmental gradient in the South-West Atlantic off Uruguay. Hydrobiologia 620: 47–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carozza, C. & D. Hernández, 2007. Estimación de la Captura Biológicamente Aceptable de corvina rubia (Micropogonias furnieri) para el año 2007 en el área del Río de La Plata, Zona Común de Pesca Argentino- Uruguaya y aguas adyacentes al norte de 39º LS. DNI-INIDEP N° 62/07, Mar del Plata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carranza, A. & S. Horta, 2008. Megabenthic gastropods in the outer Uruguayan continental shelf: composition, distribution and some effects of trawling. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 43: 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassot, E., T. Rouyer, V. M. Trenkel & D. Gascuel, 2008. Investigating trophic level variability in Celtic Sea fish predators. Journal of Fish Biology 73(4): 763–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, V., 1995. Ecosystem maturity – towards quantification. Ecological Modelling 77: 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, N. L., A. Bartuska, J. H. Brown, S. Carpenter, C. D’Antonio, R. Francis, J. F. Franklin, J. A. MacMahon, R. F. Noss, D. J. Parsons, C. H. Peterson, M. G. Turner & R. G. Moodmansee, 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6: 665–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, V. & D. Pauly, 1992. ECOPATH II – a software for balancing steady-state ecosystem models and calculating network characteristics. Ecological Modelling 61: 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, V., C. Walters & D. Pauly, 2005. Ecopath with Ecosim: A User’s Guide. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPC: Climate Prediction Center, 2014. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ensoyears.shtml].

  • Colautti, D. & P. Suquele, 2006. La pesquería de corvina rubia (Micropogonias furnieri) en los puertos de la zona norte de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, año 2006. Análisis de partes de pesca. Ministerio de Asuntos Agrarios, Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, M. & S. Libralato, 2012. Contributions of food-web modelling for an ecosystem approach of marine resource management in the Mediterranean Sea. Fish and Fisheries 13: 60–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, M., A. Santojanni, I. Palomera, S. Tudela & E. Arneri, 2007. An ecological model of the Northern and Central Adriatic Sea: analysis of ecosystem structure and fishing impacts. Journal of Marine Systems 67: 119–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, M., S. Libralato, S. Tudela, I. Palomera & F. Pranovi, 2008. Ecosystem overfishing in the Ocean. PLoS One 3(12): e3881.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colleter, M., J. Guitton & D. Gascuel, 2013. An introduction to the EcoTroph R Package: analyzing aquatic ecosystem trophic networks. R Journal 5: 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, A. J., W. K. de la Mare, D. J. Agnew, I. Everson & D. Miller, 2000. Managing fisheries to conserve the Antarctic marine ecosystem: practical implementation of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 778–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., 2012. Ecosystem health and ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering 45: 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contín, J. & D. Colautti, 2008. Distribución geográfica de los sectores de pesca utilizados por la flota comercial que operó en el Río de la Plata durante la zafra invernal de la corvina rubia Micropogonias furnieri 2007. Ministerio de Asuntos Agrarios, Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortelezzi, A., A. Capítulo, L. Boccardi & R. Arocena, 2007. Benthic assemblages of a temperate estuarine system in South America: transition from a freshwater to an estuarine zone. Journal of Marine Systems 68: 569–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortés, E., 1999. Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks. ICES Journal of Marine Science 56: 707–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagg, M., R. Benner, S. Lohrenz & D. Lawrence, 2004. Transformation of dissolved and particulate materials on continental shelves influenced by large rivers: plume processes. Continental Shelf Research 24: 833–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defeo, O., S. Horta, A. Carranza, D. Lercari, D. A. De Álava, J. Gómez, G. Martínez, J. P. Lozoya & E. Celentano, 2009. Hacia un manejo ecosistémico de pesquerías. Áreas marinas protegidas en Uruguay. Facultad de Ciencias – DINARA, Montevideo: 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defeo, O., P. Puig, S. Horta & A. de Álava, 2011. Coastal fisheries of Uruguay. In Salas, S., R. Chuenpagdee, A. Charles & J. C. Seijo (eds) Coastal Fisheries of Latin America and the Caribbean. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 544, Rome, Italy: 357–384.

  • de Miranda, L. V. & M. Haimovici, 2007. Changes in the population structure, growth and mortality of stripped weakfish Cynoscion guatucupa (Sciaenidae, Teleostei) of Southern Brazil between 1976 and 2002. Hydrobiologia 589: 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essington, T. E., 2007. Evaluating the sensitivity of a trophic massbalance model (Ecopath) to imprecise data inputs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64: 628–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essington, T. E. & A. E. Punt, 2011. Implementing ecosystem-based fisheries management: advances, challenges and emerging tools. Fish and Fisheries 12: 123–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 1995. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, Roma, Italy: 41.

  • FAO, 2011. Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 569, Rome.

  • Framiñan, M. B. & O. B. Brown, 1996. Study of the Río de la Plata turbidity front, Part 1: spatial and temporal distribution. Continental Shelf Research 16: 1259–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, E. A., M. Fuller, A. D. M. Smith & A. E. Punt, 2005. Ecological Indicators of the Ecosystem Effects of Fishing: Final Report. Australian Fisheries Management Authority Report, R99/1546: 239.

  • Funtowicz, S. O. & J. R. Ravetz, 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Kluwer, Dortrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, O., 2008. Pesca sustentable y soberanía alimentaria en Uruguay, un modelo para armar. Redes Amigos de la Tierra, Montevideo.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, S. & K. Cochrane, 2005. Ecosystem approach to fisheries: a review of implementation guidelines. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62: 311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S. M., A. Zerbi, C. Aliaume, T. Do Chi & G. Lasserre, 2003. The ecosystem approach to fisheries. Issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 443, Rome.

  • Gutiérrez, N. L. & O. Defeo (eds), 2012. Evaluación de recursos pesqueros de Uruguay mediante modelos dinámicos. MGAP – DINARA – FAO, Montevideo: 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, R. A., E. M. Acha, M. B. Framiñan & C. A. Lasta, 1997. Physical oceanography of the Río de la Plata estuary, Argentina. Continental Shelf Research 17: 727–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, H., V. Prieto & M. J. Kaiser, 2009. Trawl disturbance on benthic communities: chronic effects and experimental predictions. Ecological Applications 19: 761–773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, K. A., J. F. Piatt & J. Pitocchelli, 1994. Using stable isotopes to determine seabird trophic relationships. Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 786–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollowed, A., N. Bax, R. Beamish, J. Collie, M. Fogarty, P. Livingston, J. Pope & J. C. Rice, 2000. Are multispecies models an improvement on single-species models for measuring fishing impacts on marine ecosystems? ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 707–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, S. & O. Defeo, 2012. The spatial dynamics of the whitemouth croaker artisanal fishery in Uruguay and interdependencies with the industrial fleet. Fisheries Research 125–126: 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huret, M., I. Dadou, F. Dumas, P. Lazure & V. Garcon, 2005. Coupling physical and biogeochemical processes in the Río de la Plata plume. Continental Shelf Research 25: 629–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarre-Teichmann, A. & V. Christensen, 1998. Comparative modelling of trophic flows in four large upwelling ecosystems: global versus local effects. In Durand, M. H., P. Cury, R. Mendelssohn, C. Roy, A. Bakun & D. Pauly (eds), Global Versus Local Changes in Upwelling Systems. ORSTOM, Paris: 423–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaureguizar, A. J. & A. C. Milessi, 2008. Assessing the sources of the fishing down marine food web process in the Argentinean–Uruguayan Common Fishing Zone. Scientia Marina 72: 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaureguizar, A., R. Menni, C. Lasta & R. Guerrero, 2006. Fish assemblages of the Northern Argentine Coastal System: spatial patterns and their temporal variations. Fisheries Oceanography 15: 326–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaschner, K. & D. Pauly, 2005. Competition between marine mammals and fisheries: food for thought. In Salem, D. J. & A. N. Rowan (eds), The State of Animals III. Humane Society of the United States Press, Washington, DC: 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, G., 2005. Discards in the world’s marine fisheries. an update. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 470, Rome.

  • Lercari, D. & L. Bergamino, 2011. Impacts of two invasive mollusks, Rapana venosa (Gastropoda) and Corbicula fluminea (Bivalvia), on the food web structure of the Río de la Plata estuary and nearshore oceanic ecosystem. Biological Invasions 13: 2053–2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, P. S., M. J. Fogarty, S. A. Murawski & D. Fluharty, 2009. Integrated ecosystem assessments: developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean. PLoS Biology 7(1): e14.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Libralato, S., V. Christensen & D. Pauly, 2006. A method for identifying keystone species in food web models. Ecological Modelling 195: 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libralato, S., M. Coll, S. Tudela, I. Palomera & F. Pranovi, 2008. Novel index for quantification of ecosystem effects of fishing as removal of secondary production. Marine Ecology Progress Series 355: 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, R. L., 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23: 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, J. S., 2010. Adding rigor to ecological network models by evaluating a set of pre-balance diagnostics: a plea for PREBAL. Ecological Modelling 221: 1580–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobry, J., V. David, S. Pasquaud, M. Lepage, B. Sautour & E. Rochard, 2008. Diversity and stability of an estuarine trophic network. Marine Ecology Progress Series 358: 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, I. & M. Scavino, 2013. Evaluación de la pescadilla (Cynoscion guatucupa) en la zona Común de Pesca Argentino–Uruguayo, mediante modelos dinámicos de producción. In Gutiérrez, N. L. & O. Defeo (eds), Evaluación de recursos pesqueros de Uruguay mediante modelos dinámicos de producción. Proyecto Gestión Pesquera en Uruguay, MGAP – DINARA – FAO, Montevideo: 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, I., M. Scavino & E. Chiesa, 2013. Evaluación de la corvina (Micropogonias furnieri) en la zona Común de Pesca Argentino–Uruguayo. In Gutiérrez, N. L. & O. Defeo (eds), Evaluación de recursos pesqueros de Uruguay mediante modelos dinámicos. Proyecto Gestión Pesquera en Uruguay, MGAP – DINARA – FAO, Montevideo: 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manickchand-Heileman, S., J. Mendoza-Hill, A. L. Kong & F. Arocha, 2004. A trophic model for exploring possible ecosystem impacts of fishing in the Gulf of Paria, between Venezuela and Trinidad. Ecological Modelling 172: 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massa, A., N. Hozbor, G. E. Chiaramonte, A. D. Balestra & C. M. Vooren, 2006. Mustelus schmitti. In IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2.

  • May, R. M., J. R. Beddington, C. W. Clark, S. J. Holt & R. M. Laws, 1979. Management of multispecies fisheries. Science 205(4403): 267–277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milessi, A. C., H. Arancibia, S. Neira & O. Defeo, 2005. The mean trophic level of Uruguayan landings during the period 1990–2001. Fisheries Research 74: 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora, C., A. R. Myers, M. Coll, S. Libralato, T. J. Pitcher, R. U. Sumaila, D. Zeller, R. Watson, K. J. Gaston & B. Worm, 2009. Management effectiveness of the world’s marine fisheries. PLoS Biology. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000131.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morissette, L., 2007. Complexity, cost and quality of ecosystem models and their impact on resilience: a comparative analysis, with emphasis on marine mammals and the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Ph.D. Zoology, University of British Columbia, Canada: 260.

  • Muelbert, J. H., M. Acha, H. Mianzan, R. Guerrero, R. Reta, E. S. Braga, V. M. T. Garcia, A. Berasategui, M. Gomez-Erache & F. Ramírez, 2008. Biological, physical and chemical properties at the Subtropical Shelf Front Zone in the SW Atlantic Continental Shelf. Continental Shelf Research 28: 1662–1673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murawski, S. A., 2000. Definitions of overfishing from an ecosystem perspective. Journal of Marine Science 57: 649–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murawski, S. A., 2007. Ten myths concerning ecosystem approaches to marine resource management. Marine Policy 31: 681–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, G. J., M. Gómez-Erache, C. H. López & A. C. Perdomo, 2002. Distribution patterns of nutrients and symptoms of eutrophication in the Rio de la Plata river estuary system. Hydrobiologia 475: 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, S. G. & I. N. Nilsson, 1976. Number, food and consumption, and fish predation by birds in Lake Mockeln, Southern Sweden. Ornis Scandinavica 7: 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nion, H., 2010. La pesquería costera en el área del Tratado del Río de la Plata y su Frente Marítimo. Frente Marítimo 21: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norbis, W. & O. Galli, 2013. Spatial co-occurrence of two sciaenid species (Micropogonias fuernieri and Cynocion guatucupa) subject to fishing in the Río de la Plata and oceanic coast of Uruguay: ecological or technological interdependence? Boletim Do Instituto De Pesca Sao Paulo 39: 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P., 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 104: 262–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, M., R. Levins, L. Campos, F. Berrios, F. Campos, F. Jordán, B. Hermosillo, J. Gonzalez & F. Rodriguez, 2013. Identifying keystone trophic groups in benthic ecosystems: implications for fisheries management. Ecological Indicators 25: 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasquaud, S., J. Lobry & P. Elie, 2007. Facing the necessity of describing estuarine ecosystems: a review of food web ecology study techniques. Hydrobiologia 588: 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrício, J. & J. C. Marques, 2006. Mass balanced models of the food web in three areas along a gradient of eutrophication symptoms in the south arm of the Mondego estuary (Portugal). Ecological Modelling 197: 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D., 1980. On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. Journal du Conseil international pour l’Exploration de la Mer 39: 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D. & The Sea Around Us, 2009. What we take out of the ocean: fishing. In Earle, S. A. & L. K. Glover (eds), Oceans: An Illustrated Atlas. National Geographic, Washington, DC: 312–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D. & V. Christensen, 1995. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374: 255–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D., V. Christensen & V. Sambilay, Jr., 1990. Some features of fish food consumption estimates used by ecosystem modellers. I.C.E.S. C.M. 1990/G: 17, Session O: 9.

  • Pauly, D., V. Christensen, J. Dalsgaard, R. Froese & F. C. Torres Jr, 1998a. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279: 860–863.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, A. Trites, E. Capuli & V. Christensen, 1998b. Diet composition and trophic levels of marine mammals. ICES Journal of Marine Science 55: 467–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piola, A. R., E. J. D. Campos, O. O. Möller Jr, M. Charo & C. Martinez, 2000. Subtropical shelf front off eastern South America. Journal of Geophysical Research 105(C3): 6565–6578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polovina, J. J., 1984. Model of a coral reef ecosystem. Coral Reefs 3: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. E., D. Tilman, J. A. Estes, B. A. Menge, W. J. Bond, L. S. Mills, G. Daily, J. C. Castilla, J. Lubchenco & R. T. Paine, 1996. Challenges in the quest for keystones. BioScience 46: 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puig, P., 2006. La pesca artesanal en el Río de la Plata: su presente y una visión de futuro. In Menafra, R., L. Rodríguez-Gallego, F. Scarabino & D. Conde (eds), Bases para la conservación y el manejo de la costa uruguaya. VIDA SILVESTRE (Sociedad Uruguaya para la Conservación de la Naturaleza), Montevideo: 477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puig, P., P. Grunwaldt & S. González, 2010. Pesquería artesanal de corvina en Uruguay. Frente Marítimo 21: 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R., M. Dalebout, T. A. Jefferson, L. Karkzmarski, K. Laidre, G. O’Corry-Crowe, L. Rojas-Bracho, E. Secchi, E. Slooten, B. D. Smith, J. Y. Wang, A. N. Zerbini & K. Zhou, 2012. Pontoporia blainvillei. In IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2.

  • Retta, S., G. Martinez & A. Errea, 2006. Áreas de cría de peces en la costa uruguaya. In Menafra, R., L. Rodríguez-Gallego, F. Scarabino & D. Conde (eds), Bases para la conservación y el manejo de la costa uruguaya. VIDA SILVESTRE (Sociedad Uruguaya para la Conservación de la Naturaleza), Montevideo: 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, M., M. I. Lorenzo & E. Páez, 2000. Cálculo Indirecto del Descarte Costero. Informe Técnico. Instituto Nacional de Pesca, Montevideo 48: 16.

  • Rombouts, I., G. Beaugrand, L. F. Artigas, J. C. Dauvin, F. Gevaert, E. Goberville & R. R. Kirby, 2013. Evaluating marine ecosystem health: Case studies of indicators using direct observations and modelling methods. Ecological Indicators, 24, 353–365.

  • Rybarczyk, H. & B. Elkaïm, 2003. An analysis of the trophic network of a macrotidal estuary: the Seine Estuary (Eastern Channel, Normandy, France). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58: 775–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scandol, J. P., 1998. Fundamental obstacles to the application of ecological science in fisheries management. Fish and Fisheries 23: 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarabino, F., 2006. Faunística y taxonomía de invertebrados bentónicos marinos y estuarinos de la costa uruguaya. In Menafra, R., L. Rodríguez-Gallego, F. Scarabino & D. Conde (eds), Bases para la conservación y el manejo de la costa uruguaya. VIDA SILVESTRE (Sociedad Uruguaya para la Conservación de la Naturaleza), Montevideo: 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotti, M. & F. Jordán, 2010. Relationships between centrality indices and trophic levels in food webs. Community Ecology 11(1): 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparre, P. & S. C. Venema, 1997. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 306, Rome.

  • Stergiou, Κ. Ι. & V. S. Karpouzi, 2002. Feeding habits and trophic levels of Mediterranean fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11(3): 217–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, P., R. J. Gowen, S. J. Painting, M. Elliott, R. Forster, D. K. Mills, E. Bresnan, E. Capuzzo, T. F. Fernandes, J. Foden, R. J. Geider, L. C. Gilpin, M. Huxham, A. L. McQuatters-Gollop, S. J. Malcolm, S. Saux-Picart, T. Platt, M. F. Racault, S. Sathyendranath, J. van der Molen & M. Wilkinson, 2013. Framework for understanding marine ecosystem health. Marine Ecology Progress Series 494: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomczak, M. T., B. Müller-Karulis, L. Järv, J. Kotta, G. Martin, A. Minde, A. Põllumäe, A. Razinkovas, S. Strake, M. Bucas & T. Blenckner, 2009. Analysis of trophic networks and carbon flows in south-eastern Baltic coastal ecosystems. Progress in Oceanography 81: 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travers, M., K. Watermeyer, L. J. Shannon & Y.-J. Shin, 2010. Changes in food web structure under scenarios of overfishing in the southern Benguela: comparison of the Ecosim and OSMOSE modelling approaches. Journal of Marine Systems 79: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trites, A., V. Christensen & D. Pauly, 1997. Competition between fisheries and marine mammals for prey and primary production in the Pacific Ocean. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 22: 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E., 1986. Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E., 1996. Trophic flow networks as indicators of ecosystem stress. In Polis, G. & K. Winemiller (eds), Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics. Chapman-Hall, New York: 358–368.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E., 2004. On the nature of ecodynamics. Ecological Complexity 1: 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E. & C. J. Puccia, 1990. Mixed trophic impacts in ecosystems. Coenoses 5: 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN, 1992. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janerio, Brazil, AGENDA 21.

  • UNEP, 2002. A Country Study on the Fisheries Sector in Argentina. In Hussein, A. & J. Veena (eds), Integrated Assessment of Trade Liberalization and Trade-Related Policies. UNEP Country Projects - Round II: A Synthesis Report, United Nations, New York and Geneva: 28–53.

  • Vasconcellos, M. & M. Haimovici, 2006. Status of white croaker Micropogonias furnieri exploited in southern Brazil according to alternative hypotheses of stock discreetness. Fisheries Research 80: 196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vögler, R., A. C. Milessi & R. A. Quiñones, 2003. Trophic ecology of Squatina guggenheim on the continental shelf off Uruguay and northern Argentina. Journal of Fish Biology 62: 1254–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C., V. Christensen & D. Pauly, 1997. Structuring dynamic models of exploited ecosystems from trophic mass-balance assessments. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 7: 139–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., D. Tarte, E. Hegerl & K. Short, 2002. Policy Proposals and Operational Guidance for Ecosystem-Based Management of Marine Capture Fisheries. World Wide Fund for Nature Australia, Sydney, 80 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherell, D., 2000. An ecosystem-based approach for Alaska groundfish fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 771–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Y., K. Cochrane, G. Bianchi, R. Willmann, J. Majkowski, M. Tandstad & F. Carocci, 2012. Rebuilding global fisheries: the World Summit Goal, costs and benefits. Fish and Fisheries 14: 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful for the constructive comments made by two anonymous referees that substantially improve the manuscript. We also thank all the people that produced fundamental information for the implementation of the ecosystem model for the Río de la Plata. English language final revision by D. Szteren is also acknowledged. Support from projects PDT 7107 and DINARA/FAO/GEF (ID 3410) is also recognized. DC was partially supported by CSIC-UdelaR Grupos I + D Programme 1037. We are grateful to the Uruguayan National Aquatic Resources Office (DINARA, Uruguay) for providing useful information during 2007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Lercari.

Additional information

Handling editor: Pierluigi Viaroli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lercari, D., Horta, S., Martínez, G. et al. A food web analysis of the Río de la Plata estuary and adjacent shelf ecosystem: trophic structure, biomass flows, and the role of fisheries. Hydrobiologia 742, 39–58 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1964-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1964-8

Keywords

Navigation