Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 732, Issue 1, pp 19–27 | Cite as

Fish-AMAZBOL: a database on freshwater fishes of the Bolivian Amazon

  • Fernando M. Carvajal-Vallejos
  • Rémy Bigorne
  • América J. Zeballos Fernández
  • Jaime Sarmiento
  • Soraya Barrera
  • Takayuki Yunoki
  • Marc Pouilly
  • José Zubieta
  • Evans De La Barra
  • Michel Jegú
  • Mabel Maldonado
  • Paul Van Damme
  • Ricardo Céspedes
  • Thierry Oberdorff
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

The Bolivian part of the Amazon Basin contains a mega diverse and well-preserved fish fauna. Since the last decade, this fish fauna has received an increasing attention from scientists and the national authorities as fishes represent one of the most important sources of proteins for local human communities. However, this fish fauna still remains poorly documented. Here, we present a database for fishes from the Bolivian Amazon. To build the database, we conducted an extensive literature survey of native and non-native (exotic) fishes inhabiting all major sub-drainages of the Bolivian Amazon. The database, named Fish-AMAZBOL, contains species lists for 13 Amazonian hydrological units, covering 100% of the Bolivian Amazon and approximately 65% (722,137 km2) of the all territory. Fish-AMAZBOL includes 802 valid species, 12 of them being non-native, that have been checked for systematic reliability and consistency. To put this number in perspective, this represents around 14% of the all Neotropical ichthyofauna and around 6% of all strictly freshwater fishes inhabiting the planet. This database is currently the most comprehensive database of native and non-native fish species richness available so far for the Bolivian Amazon.

Keywords

Freshwater fishes Checklist South America Amazon River basin Madera River Bolivia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special acknowledgments to Adalid Argote (FAUNAGUA), Federico Machicao (FAUNAGUA), Daniel Barrozo (FAUNAGUA, ULRA), Jimena Camacho (FAUNAGUA), Tamara Pérez (FAUNAGUA), Alfredo Arteaga (FAUNAGUA), Guido Miranda (Wildlife Conservation Society), and to the members of the ULRA for giving access to fish collections and other technical assistances. We thank Carolina Doria (UNIR, Brazil), William Ohara (UNIR, Brazil), Gislene Torrente Vilara (UFAM, Brazil), and Ariana Ribeiro (UNIR, Brazil) for providing data on the trans-boundary region (Bolivia-Brazil) of the Upper Madera basin. We thank Fabien Leprieur for statistical advises. This work was funded by IRD through the European Project BioFresh—Contract No. 226874 (http://www2.freshwaterbiodiversity.eu/). Data are also available through the BioFresh portal. http://data.freshwaterbiodiversity.eu/.

Supplementary material

10750_2014_1841_MOESM1_ESM.docx (60 kb)
Appendix 1 Fish-AMAZBOL bibliographic list. List of references used to compile the Fish-AMAZBOL database (DOC 60 KB)
10750_2014_1841_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (107 kb)
Appendix 2 Fish-AMAZBOL database. List of fish species present in each of the 13 hydrological units of the Bolivian Amazon. Fish species taxonomic classification (orders and families) was elaborated following the criteria proposed by Reis et al. (2003); genera and species within families are listed in alphabetic order. Continental origin of introduced species, SA: South America; NA: North America; AF: Africa; AS: Asia. Type material (valid species-145, and synonyms) from the Bolivian Amazon are indicated. The list of type material (160) includes species described by Heckel (1840) from the Iténez River (Guaporé River in Brazil). Also include are the altitude maximum (Max [m.a.s.l.]); minimum (Min [m.a.s.l.]) and mean (Mean [m.a.s.l.]) of occurrence of each species listed in the Fish-AMAZBOL database. Missing entries = data not available (XLS 107 KB)

References

  1. Albert, J. & R. Reis, 2011. Introduction to Neotropical freshwaters. In Albert, J. S. & R. E. Reis (eds), Historical biogeography of Neotropical freshwater fishes. University of California Press, London: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baselga, A., 2012. The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21: 1223–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Britto, M. R., 2003. Phylogeny of the subfamily Corydoradinae (Siluriformes: Callichthyidae), with a definition of its genera. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 153: 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckup, P. A., N. A. Menezes, M. S. Ghazzi (eds), 2007. Catálogo das Espécies de Peixes de Água Doce do Brasil. Série Livros 23, Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  5. Carvajal-Vallejos, F. M., 2013. Phylogeny and population genetics of the fish performing the largest migration known in freshwater, the Amazonian catfish Brachyplatystoma rousseauxii: Revelations from the Upper Madera. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Montpellier II University, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
  6. Carvajal-Vallejos, F. M. & A. J. Zeballos Fernández, 2011. Diversidad y distribución de los peces de la Amazonía boliviana. In Van Damme, P. A., F. M. Carvajal-Vallejos & J. Molina Carpio (eds), Peces y delfines de la Amazonía boliviana: hábitats, potencialidades y amenazas. Editorial INIA, Cochabamba, Bolivia: 101-147.Google Scholar
  7. Carvajal-Vallejos, F. M., P. A. Van Damme, M. Jégu & J. P. Torrico, 2009. Colossoma macropomum. In Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Agua (ed.), Libro rojo de la fauna silvestre de vertebrados de Bolivia. La Paz, Bolivia: 69–70.Google Scholar
  8. Carvajal-Vallejos, F. M., P. A. Van Damme, L. Córdova & C. Coca, 2011. La introducción de Arapaima gigas (paiche) en la Amazonía boliviana. In Van Damme, P. A., F. M. Carvajal-Vallejos & J. Molina Carpio (eds), Peces y delfines de la Amazonía boliviana: hábitats, potencialidades y amenazas. Editorial INIA, Cochabamba, Bolivia: 367–395.Google Scholar
  9. Carvalho, T. P. & J. S. Albert, 2011. The Amazon-Paraguay divide. In Albert, J. S. & R. E. Reis (eds), Historical biogeography of Neotropical freshwater fishes. University of California Press, London: 193–202.Google Scholar
  10. Chernoff, B. & P. W. Willink (eds), 1999. A biological assessment of the aquatic ecosystems of the Upper Río Orthon basin, Pando, Bolivia. Bulletin of Biological Assessment 15. Conservation International, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  11. Chernoff, B., A. Machado-Allison, P. Willink, J. Sarmiento, S. Barrera, N. Menezes & H. Ortega, 2000. Fishes of three Bolivian rivers: diversity, distribution and conservation. Interciencia 25: 273–283.Google Scholar
  12. Eschmeyer, W. N. (ed)., 2013. Catalog of Fishes. California Academy of Sciences. http://research.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. Electronic version updated December 10/2013.
  13. Froese, R. & D. Pauly, 2013. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org, version (October/2013).
  14. Hablützel, P. I., T. Yunoki & L. Torres Velasco, 2013. Update on the checklist of fish species of the Bolivian Amazon. Check List 9: 208–210.Google Scholar
  15. Jégu, M., L. J. Queiroz, J. Camacho Terrazas, G. Torrente-Vilara, F. M. Carvajal-Vallejos, M. Pouilly, T. Yunoki & J. A. S. Zuanon, 2012. Catálogo de los peces de la cuenca Iténez (Bolivia y Brasil). In Van Damme, P. A., M. Maldonado, M. Pouilly & C. R. C. Doria (eds), Aguas del Iténez o Guaporé: Recursos hidrobiológicos de un patrimonio binacional (Bolivia y Brasil). Editorial INIA, Cochabamba, Bolivia: 111–156.Google Scholar
  16. Josse, C., R. Young, T. Lyons-Smyth, T. Brooks, A. Frances, P. Comer, P. Petry, H. Balslev, B. Bassuner, B. Goettsch, J. Hak, P. Jørgensen, D. Larrea-Alcázar, G. Navarro, S. Saatchi, A. Sanchez de Lozada, J. C. Svenning, L. A. Tovar & A. Moscoso, 2013. Desarrollo de insumos para la toma de decisiones de conservación en la cuenca amazónica occidental. Ecología Aplicada 12: 45–65.Google Scholar
  17. Kelley, L. A., S. P. Gardner & M. J. Sutcliffe, 1996. An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. Protein Engineering 9: 1063–1065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lasso, C., V. Castelló, T. Canales-Tilve & J. Cabot-Nieves, 1999. Contribución al conocimiento de la ictiofauna del Río Paraguá, cuenca del Río Iténez o Guaporé, Amazonía boliviana. Memoria de la Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales 152: 89–103.Google Scholar
  19. Lauzanne, L., G. Loubens & B. Le Guennec, 1991. Liste commentée des poissons de l’Amazonie bolivienne. Revue d’Hydrobiologie Tropicale 24: 61–76.Google Scholar
  20. Leprieur, F. & A. Oikonomou, 2014. The need for richness-independent measures of turnover when delineating biogeographical regions. Journal of Biogeography 41: 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lévêque, C., T. Oberdorff, D. Paugy, M. L. J. Stiassny & P. A. Tedesco, 2008. Global diversity of fish (Pisces) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lundberg, J. G., J. P. Sullivan & M. Hardman, 2011. Phylogenetics of the South American catfish family Pimelodidae (Teleostei: Siluriformes) using nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 161: 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mirande, J. M., 2009. Weighted parsimony phylogeny of the family Characidae (Teleostei: Characiformes). Cladistics 25: 574–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mirande, J. M., 2010. Phylogeny of the family Characidae (Teleostei: Characiformes): from characters to taxonomy. Neotropical Ichthyology 8: 385–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Netto-Ferreira, A. L., J. L. Birindelli, L. Sousa, T. Mariguela & C. Oliveira, 2013. A new miniature Characid (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Characidae), with phylogenetic position inferred from morphological and molecular data. PLoS ONE 8: e52098.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oliveira, C., G. S. Avelino, K. T. Abe, T. C. Mariguela, R. C. Benine, G. Ortí, R. P. Vari & R. M. Castro, 2011. Phylogenetic relationships within the speciose family Characidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes) based on multilocus analysis and extensive ingroup sampling. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 275.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pearson, N. E., 1924. The fishes of the eastern slope of the Andes. I. The fishes of the Río Beni basin, Bolivia, collected by the Mulford Expedition. Indiana University Studies 11: 1–83.Google Scholar
  28. Pearson, N. E., 1937. The fishes of the Beni-Mamoré and Paraguay basin, and a discussion of the origin of the Paraguayan fauna. Proceedings of the Californian Academy of Sciences 23: 99–114.Google Scholar
  29. Pouilly, M., M. Jégu, J. Camacho, M. Quintanilla, G. Miranda, J. P. Zubieta & T. Yunoki, 2010. Lista actualizada y distribución de los peces en las tierras bajas de la Amazonía boliviana. Revista Boliviana de Ecología y Conservación Ambiental 28: 73–97.Google Scholar
  30. Reis, R. E., S. O. Kullander & C. J. Ferraris Jr. (eds), 2003. Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.Google Scholar
  31. Sarmiento, J., 1998. Ichthyology of Parque Nacional Noel Kempff Mercado. In Killeen, T. J. & T. S. Schulenber (eds), A Biological Assessment of Parque Nacional Noel Kempff Mercado. Appendix 5, RAP Working Papers 10, Washington, D.C.: 168–180.Google Scholar
  32. Van Damme, P. A. & F. M. Carvajal-Vallejos, 2012. Los recursos hidrobiológicos en el río Iténez y sus tributarios: diversidad, aprovechamiento y manejo. In Van Damme, P. A., M. Maldonado, M. Pouilly & C. R. C. Doria (eds), Aguas del Iténez o Guaporé: Recursos hidrobiológicos de un patrimonio binacional (Bolivia y Brasil). Editorial INIA, Cochabamba, Bolivia: 401–420.Google Scholar
  33. Van Damme, P. A., F. M. Carvajal-Vallejos, J. Sarmiento, S. Barrera, K. Osinaga & G. Miranda-Chumacero, 2009. Capítulo 2: Peces. In Aguirre, L. F., R. Aguayo, J. Balderrama, C. Cortez & T. Tarifa (eds), Libro rojo de la fauna silvestre de vertebrados de Bolivia. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Agua, Viceministerio de Medio Ambiente, Biodiversidad y Cambios Climáticos, La Paz, Bolivia: 31–42.Google Scholar
  34. Van Damme, P. A., F. M. Carvajal-Vallejos, M. Pouilly, T. Pérez & J. Molina Carpio, 2011. Amenazas para los peces y las pesquerías de la Amazonía boliviana. In Van Damme, P. A., F. M. Carvajal-Vallejos & J. Molina Carpio (eds), Peces y Delfines de la Amazonía boliviana: hábitats, potencialidades y amenazas. Editorial INIA, Cochabamba, Bolivia: 327–365.Google Scholar
  35. Weitzman, S. H. & L. Palmer, 1997. A new species of Hyphessobrycon (Teleostei: Characidae) from the Neblina region of Venezuela and Brazil, with comments on the putative ‘rosy tetra clade’. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 7: 209–242.Google Scholar
  36. Welcomme, R. L., 1988. International introductions of inland aquatic species. FAO Fish. Technical Paper No. 294. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando M. Carvajal-Vallejos
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rémy Bigorne
    • 1
  • América J. Zeballos Fernández
    • 1
  • Jaime Sarmiento
    • 5
  • Soraya Barrera
    • 5
  • Takayuki Yunoki
    • 6
  • Marc Pouilly
    • 1
  • José Zubieta
    • 1
    • 3
  • Evans De La Barra
    • 1
    • 3
  • Michel Jegú
    • 1
  • Mabel Maldonado
    • 3
  • Paul Van Damme
    • 2
  • Ricardo Céspedes
    • 4
  • Thierry Oberdorff
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.UMR ‘BOREA’, IRD 207/CNRS 7208/MNHN/UPCM, DMPA, Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleParis CedexFrance
  2. 2.FAUNAGUA, Institute for Applied Research on Aquatic ResourcesCochabambaPlurinational State of Bolivia
  3. 3.Unidad de Limnología y Recursos Acuáticos (ULRA), Facultad de Ciencias y Tecnología (FCyT)Universidad Mayor de San Simón (UMSS)CochabambaPlurinational State of Bolivia
  4. 4.Museo Alcides D’OrbignyCochabambaPlurinational State of Bolivia
  5. 5.Museo Nacional de Historia Natural - Instituto de EcologíaColección Boliviana de Fauna (CBF)La PazPlurinational State of Bolivia
  6. 6.Centro de Investigaciones de Recursos Acuáticos (CIRA)Universidad Autónoma del Beni (UAB)TrinidadPlurinational State of Bolivia

Personalised recommendations