, Volume 730, Issue 1, pp 179–190 | Cite as

Shifts in fish assemblages indicate failed recovery of threatened species following prolonged drought in terminating lakes of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

  • Scotte D. Wedderburn
  • Thomas C. Barnes
  • Karl A. Hillyard
Primary Research Paper


Freshwater fishes are vulnerable to changes in water quality, physical habitat and connectivity resulting from drought, particularly in regulated rivers. When adequate river flows return, the recovery of populations might depend on the duration and consequences of drought. Rivers of the highly regulated Murray–Darling Basin in south-eastern Australia terminate at two large, shallow lakes that are separated from the estuary by tidal barrages. Over-abstraction of water and widespread prolonged drought (1997–2010) placed the lakes under severe environmental stress, culminating in critical water level recession from 2007 to 2010. Concurrently, most freshwater fish populations collapsed. We investigate shifts in fish assemblages resulting from habitat inundation in the lakes following the drought. The inundation and re-connection of the lakes and fringing habitats led to a substantial reduction of salinity throughout the region, and aquatic vegetation shifted from salt-tolerant to freshwater species. Fish assemblages became increasingly characterized by common freshwater taxa (ecological generalists), including high proportions of alien species. There were no indications of population recovery for three threatened species. The findings emphasize that short-lived fishes with specialized habitat requirements are vulnerable to severe population declines during prolonged drought in regulated rivers, which might restrict their recovery when adequate flows return.


Threatened fish Population recovery Drought River regulation Flood 



This study was funded by the Murray–Darling Basin Authority’s The Living Murray program through the South Australian Murray–Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board and the Department for Water, and it was managed by Adrienne Frears. Thanks to the landholders who granted access to study sites, including Kevin and Benita Wells, Colin and Sally Grundy, Chris and Beth Cowan, Jamie Withers, Ack and Jenny Vercoe, Lesley and Mick Fischer, Phil and Yvonne Giles, and Amanda Burger. Thank you to field assistants Anthony Camilleri and Yanima Hartman from the Ngarrindjeri Regional Authority and Colin Bailey. Thank you to Associate Professor Keith Walker for his guidance on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank five anonymous reviewers for their helpful advice. Sampling was conducted in accordance with the University of Adelaide’s Animal Ethics Policy and the South Australian Fisheries Management Act 2007.


  1. Aarts, B. G. W., F. W. B. Van den Brink & P. H. Nienhuis, 2004. Habitat loss as the main cause of the slow recovery of fish faunas of regulated large rivers in Europe: the transversal floodplain gradient. River Research and Applications 20: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angermeier, P. I., 1995. Ecological attributes of extinction-prone species: loss of freshwater fishes of Virginia. Conservation Biology 9: 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertozzi, T., M. Adams & K. F. Walker, 2000. Species boundaries in carp gudgeons (Eleotrididae: Hypseleotris) from the River Murray, South Australia: evidence for multiple species and extensive hybridization. Marine and Freshwater Research 51: 805–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, N. R., P. S. Lake & A. H. Arthington, 2008. The impacts of drought on freshwater ecosystems: an Australian perspective. Hydrobiologia 600: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cadwallader, P. & B. Lawrence, 1990. Fish. In Mackay, N. & D. Eastburn (eds), The Murray. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra: 316–335.Google Scholar
  6. Chessman, B. C., 2013. Identifying species at risk from climate change: traits predict the drought vulnerability of freshwater fishes. Biological Conservation 160: 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devictor, V., J. Clavel, R. Julliard, S. Lavergne, D. Mouillot, W. Thuiller, P. Venail, S. Villéger & N. Mouquet, 2010. Defining and measuring ecological specialization. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diehl, S. & P. Eklöv, 1995. Effects of piscivore-mediated habitat use on resources, diet, and growth of perch. Ecology 76: 1712–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eastburn, D., 1990. The river. In Mackay, N. & D. Eastburn (eds), The Murray. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra: 3–15.Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, I. M., D. Stoessel, M. P. Hammer, S. D. Wedderburn, L. Suitor & A. Hall, 2013. Conservation of an inauspicious endangered freshwater fish, Murray hardyhead (Craterocephalus fluviatilis), during drought and competing water demands in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 64: 792–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fratto, Z. W., V. A. Barko & J. S. Scheibe, 2008. Development and efficacy of a bycatch reduction device for Wisconsin-type fyke nets deployed in freshwater systems. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 7: 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freitas, C. E. C., F. K. Siqueira-Souza, R. Humston & L. E. Hurd, 2013. An initial assessment of drought sensitivity in Amazonian fish communities. Hydrobiologia 705: 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galat, D. L. & I. Zweimüller, 2001. Conserving large-river fishes: is the highway analogy an appropriate paradigm? Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gomes, L. C., C. K. Bulla, A. A. Agostinho, L. P. Vasconcelos & L. E. Miranda, 2012. Fish assemblage dynamics in a neotropical floodplain relative to aquatic macrophytes and the homogenizing effect of a flood pulse. Hydrobiologia 685: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammer, M., S. Wedderburn & S. Westergaard, 2002. Freshwater fishes. In Brandle, R. (ed.), A Biological Survey of the Murray Mouth Reserves. Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide: 54–61.Google Scholar
  16. Hammer, M. P., P. J. Unmack, M. Adams, J. B. Johnson & K. F. Walker, 2010. Phylogeographic structure in the threatened Yarra pygmy perch Nannoperca obscura (Teleostei: Percichthyidae) has major implications for declining populations. Conservation Genetics 11: 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammer, M. P., C. M. Bice, A. Hall, A. Frears, A. Watt, N. S. Whiterod, L. B. Beheregaray, J. O. Harris & B. P. Zampatti, 2013. Freshwater fish conservation in the face of critical water shortages in the southern Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 64: 807–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hillyard, K. A., 2011. Carp exclusion screens on wetland inlets: their value for control of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and effects on offstream movements by other fish species in the River Murray, Australia. PhD Thesis. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  19. Lévêque, C., T. Oberdorff, D. Paugy, M. L. J. Stiassny & P. A. Tedesco, 2008. Global diversity of fish (Pisces) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lintermans, M., 2007. Fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin: An Introductory Guide. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
  21. Lucas, M. C. & E. Baras, 2001. Migration of Freshwater Fishes. Blackwell Science, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Macdonald, J. I., Z. D. Tonkin, D. S. L. Ramsey, A. K. Kaus, A. K. King & D. A. Crook, 2012. Do invasive eastern gambusia (Gambusia holbrooki) shape wetland fish assemblage structure in south-eastern Australia? Marine and Freshwater Research 63: 659–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Magalhães, M. F., P. Beja, I. J. Schlosser & M. J. Collares-Pereira, 2007. Effects of multi-year droughts on fish assemblages of seasonally drying Mediterranean streams. Freshwater Biology 52: 1494–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Magaña, H. A., 2012. Habitat use of the Rio Grande silvery minnow (Hybognathus amarus) during a long-term flood pulse in the Middle Rio Grande, New Mexico. Environmental Biology of Fishes 95: 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magoulick, D. D. & R. M. Kobza, 2003. The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis. Freshwater Biology 48: 1186–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matthews, W. J. & E. Marsh-Matthews, 2003. Effects of drought on fish across axes of space, time and ecological complexity. Freshwater Biology 48: 1232–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayora, G., M. Devercelli & F. Giri, 2013. Spatial variability of chlorophyll-a and abiotic variables in a river–floodplain system during different hydrological phases. Hydrobiologia 717: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCune, B. & J. B. Grace, 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software, Oregon.Google Scholar
  29. McCune, B. & M. J. Mefford, 2011. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 6. MjM Software, Oregon.Google Scholar
  30. Mouquet, N., P. Munguia, J. M. Kneitel & T. E. Miller, 2003. Community assembly time and the relationship between local and regional species richness. Oikos 103: 618–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nicol, J. M., S. L. Gehrig, K. A. Frahn & A. D. Strawbridge, 2013. Resilience and Resistance of Aquatic Plant Communities Downstream of Lock 1 in the Murray River. Goyder Institute for Water Research, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  32. Ormerod, S. J., 2009. Climate change, river conservation and the adaptation challenge. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19: 609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sedell, J. R., G. H. Reeves, R. F. Hauer, J. A. Stanford & C. P. Hawkins, 1990. Role of refugia in recovery from disturbances: modern fragmented and disconnected river systems. Environmental Management 14: 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sparkes, R. E., P. B. Bayley, S. L. Kohler & L. L. Osborne, 1990. Disturbance and recovery of large floodplain rivers. Environmental Management 14: 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomaz, S. M., L. M. Bini & R. L. Bozelli, 2007. Floods increase similarity amoung aquatic habitats in river–floodplain systems. Hydrobiologia 579: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tonkin, Z., A. J. King & J. Mahoney, 2008. Effects of flooding on recruitment and dispersal of the Southern Pygmy Perch (Nannoperca australis) at a Murray River floodplain wetland. Ecological Management and Restoration 9: 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walker, K. F., 2006. Serial weirs, cumulative effects: the Lower River Murray, Australia. In Kingsford, R. (ed.), The Ecology of Desert Rivers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 248–279.Google Scholar
  38. Wedderburn, S. D. & K. F. Walker, 2008. Osmoregulation in populations of an endangered hardyhead (Atherinidae: Craterocephalus fluviatilis McCulloch, 1912) from different salinity regimes. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 17: 653–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wedderburn, S. D., K. F. Walker & B. P. Zampatti, 2007. Habitat separation of Craterocephalus (Atherinidae) species and populations in off-channel areas of the lower River Murray, Australia. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 16: 442–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wedderburn, S. D., M. P. Hammer & C. M. Bice, 2012. Shifts in small-bodied fish assemblages resulting from drought-induced water level recession in terminating lakes of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Hydrobiologia 691: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wedderburn, S. D., K. A. Hillyard & R. J. Shiel, 2013. Zooplankton response to flooding of a drought refuge and implications for the endangered fish species Craterocephalus fluviatilis cohabiting with alien Gambusia holbrooki. Aquatic Ecology 47: 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson, S. K., S. C. Burgess, A. J. Cheal, M. Emslie, R. Fisher, I. Miller, N. V. C. Polunin & H. P. A. Sweatman, 2008. Habitat utilization by coral reef fish: implications for specialists vs. generalists in a changing environment. Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 220–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zampatti, B., C. Bice & P. Jennings, 2010. Temporal variability in fish assemblage structure and recruitment in a freshwater deprived estuary: The Coorong, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 61: 1298–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zeug, S. C. & K. O. Winemiller, 2008. Relationships between hydrology, spatial heterogeneity, and fish recruitment dynamics in a temperate floodplain river. River Research and Applications 24: 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scotte D. Wedderburn
    • 1
  • Thomas C. Barnes
    • 1
  • Karl A. Hillyard
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations