Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biodiversity in Mediterranean-climate streams of California

  • MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATE STREAMS
  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the California mediterranean climate region is widely considered a biodiversity hotspot for terrestrial plants and vertebrates, freshwater biodiversity in this region is generally not well known. Using information from museum specimen databases, published literature, biological assessment surveys, and specialist’s knowledge, we review freshwater biodiversity for several groups of stream organisms in the med-climate region of California, which includes 2,220 species in 292 families. The groups with the highest diversity of lotic species are aquatic insects and diatoms, which comprise 39 and 36 % of species in our lists, respectively. Sequential floods and drying periods limit the overall biodiversity of many stream organisms in California mediterranean rivers, and continued climate and land-use change may cause disproportionate biodiversity declines in the region. However, only 4 % of lotic species have been evaluated in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, and many assessments are outdated. Future development of online databases for botanical and zoological collections will significantly enhance biodiversity and distribution knowledge. This information will enable us to more accurately and efficiently assess the effects of global change on biodiversity of freshwater organisms, to evaluate conservation status of individual taxa, and to set conservation priorities for stream ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly, D. D., 2009. Evolution, origin and age of lineages in the Californian and Mediterranean floras. Journal of Biogeography 36: 1221–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. D. & A. S. Flecker, 1993. Biodiversity conservation in running waters. Bioscience 43: 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, M. T. K., F. Ojeda, C. Cavieres, C. Marticorena & M. Muñoz-Schick, 1995. Convergence in the mediterranean floras in central Chile and California: insights from comparative biogeography. In Arroyo, M. T. K., P. H. Zedler & M. D. Fox (eds), Ecology and Biogeography of Mediterranean Ecosystems in Chile, California and Australia. Springer, Berlin: 43–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aschmann, H., 1973. Distribution and peculiarity of Mediterranean ecosystems. In Di Castri, F. & H. A. Mooney (eds), Mediterranean Type Ecosystems: Origin and Structure. Springer, Berlin: 11–19.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., 2003. The status and future of biologicial assessment for California streams. http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/biocalstreams.shtml. California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality. Sacramento.

  • Bêche, L. A. & V. H. Resh, 2007. Short-term climatic trends affect the temporal variability of macroinvertebrates in California ‘Mediterranean’ streams. Freshwater Biology 52: 2317–2339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bêche, L. A. & B. Statzner, 2009. Richness gradients of stream invertebrates across the USA: taxonomy- and trait-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 3909–3930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bêche, L. A., E. P. McElravy & V. H. Resh, 2006. Long-term seasonal variation in the biological traits of benthic-macroinvertebrates in two Mediterranean-climate streams in California, USA. Freshwater Biology 51: 56–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, K. R., 2009. Common Dragonflies of California. Azalea Creek Publishing, Sebastopol, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, K. R., 2011. California dragonflies and damselflies. http://bigsnest.members.sonic.net/Pond/dragons/. Accessed September 20, 2011.

  • Bonada, N. & S. Dolédec, 2011. Do mediterranean genera not included in Tachet et al. 2002 have mediterranean trait characteristics? Limnetica 30: 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonada, N., M. Rieradevall, N. Prat & V. H. Resh, 2006. Benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages and macrohabitat connectivity in Mediterranean-climate streams of northern California. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25: 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonada, N., S. Dolédec & B. Statzner, 2007. Taxonomic and biological trait differences of stream macroinvertebrate communities between mediterranean and temperate regions: implications for future climatic scenarios. Global Change Biology 13: 1658–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Academy of Sciences, 2011. General Collection Database. http://research.calacademy.org/redirect?url=http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/entomology/EntInv/index.asp. Accessed September 20 2011.

  • Carter, J. L. & V. H. Resh, 2005. Pacific Coast Rivers of the Coterminous United States. In Benke, A. C. & C. E. Cushing (eds), Rivers of North America. Elsevier Inc., Burlington, MA: 541–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caterino, M. S., 2006. California beetle faunistics: 100 years after fall. Coleopterists Bulletin 60: 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game), 2011. State and Federally Listed Endangered & Threatened Animals of California. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/pdfs/TEAnimals.pdf. Accessed May 15 2012.

  • Chan, K. M. A., M. R. Shaw, D. R. Cameron, E. C. Underwood & G. C. Daily, 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. Plos Biology 4: 2138–2152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chevenet, F., S. Dolédec & D. Chessel, 1994. A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long-term ecological data. Freshwater Biology 31: 30–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. L. & H. A. Mooney, 1978. Convergence versus non-convergence in Mediterranean-climate ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9: 265–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, R. M., F. Ojeda, B. B. Lamont, P. W. Rundel & R. Lechmere-Oertel, 2005. Rainfall reliability, a neglected factor in explaining convergence and divergence of plant traits in fire-prone mediterranean-climate ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14: 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C., 2004. Declining downwind: Amphibian population declines in California and historical pesticide use. Ecological Applications 14: 1892–1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. C., 1956. Ephemeroptera. In Usinger, H. P. (ed.), Aquatic Insects of California: With Keys to North American Genera and California Species. University of California Press, Berkeley: 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, D. G., 1956. Trichoptera. In Usinger, H. P. (ed.), Aquatic Insects of California: With Keys to North American Genera and California Species. University of California Press, Berkeley: 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt, R. E., C. Favret & D. W. Webb, 2005. Just how imperiled are aquatic insects? A case study of stoneflies (Plecoptera) in Illinois. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98: 941–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt, R. E., Y. Cao, L. Hinz & T. Tweddale, 2009. Modelling of historical stonefly distributions using museum specimens. Aquatic Insects 31: 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt, R. E., U. Neu-Becker, G. Stueber & D. C. Eades, 2011. Plecoptera Species File Online: Version 1.1/4.0. http://plecoptera.speciesfile.org/HomePage.aspx. Accessed September 20, 2011.

  • di Castri, F., 1981. Mediterranean-type shrublands of the world. In di Castri, F., D. W. Goodall & R. L. Specht (eds), Mediterranean-type Shrublands. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Castri, F., 1991. An ecological overview of the five regions with a mediterranean climate. In Groves, R. H. & F. di Castri (eds), Biogeography of Mediterranean Invasions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 3–16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dray, S. & A. B. Dufour, 2007. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 22: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI, 2011. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essig Museum of Entomology, University of California Berkeley, 2011. Essig Specimen Database. http://essigdb.berkeley.edu/aboutdb.html. Accessed September 20, 2011.

  • Filipe, A. F., J. E. Lawrence & N. Bonada, 2012. Vulnerability of stream biota to climate change in mediterranean climate regions: a synthesis of ecological responses and conservation challenges. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1244-4.

  • Fisher, R. N. & H. B. Shaffer, 1996. The decline of amphibians in California’s Great Central Valley. Conservation Biology 10: 1387–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamradt, S. C. & L. B. Kats, 1996. Effect of introduced crayfish and mosquitofish on California newts. Conservation Biology 10: 1155–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasith, A. & V. H. Resh, 1999. Streams in Mediterranean climate regions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 51–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, T. E., A. M. Merenlender & V. H. Resh, 2010. Climatic influences and anthropogenic stressors: an integrated framework for streamflow management in Mediterranean-climate California, USA. Freshwater Biology 55: 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guralnick, R. & H. Constable, 2010. VertNet: creating a data-sharing community. BioScience 60: 258–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. J. & F. P. Ide, 1987. Evidence of acidification effects on stream insect communities in central Ontario between 1937 and 1985. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44: 1652–1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. S., E. F. Benfield, P. V. Bolstad, G. S. Helfman & E. B. D. Jones, 1998. Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95: 14843–14847.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, B. P., 1998. Biogeography of eight large branchiopods endemic to California. In Witham, C. W., E. T. Bauder, D. Belk, W. R. J. Ferren & R. Ornduff (eds), Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems—Proceedings from a 1996 Conference. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. E., D. C. Rogers, B. D. Quelvog & S. P. Gallegher, 1997. New records and observations on the anostracan genus Eubranchipus in California. Hydrobiologia 359: 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A., R. Guralnick, A. Smith, A. Sallans, R. Gillespie, M. Denslow, J. Gross, Z. Murrell, T. Conyers, P. Oboyski, J. Ball, A. Thomer, R. Prys-Jones, J. d la torre, P. Kociolek & L. Fortson, 2012. The notes from nature tool for unlocking biodiversity records from museum records through citizen science. ZooKeys 209: 219–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. J. & H. A. Mooney, 1997. Broadening the extinction debate – population deletions and additions in California and Western Australia. Conservation Biology 12: 271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzenthal, R. W., D. R. Robertson, S. U. Pauls & P. K. Mendez, 2010. Taxonomy and systematics: contributions to benthology and J-NABS. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS), Prairie Research Institute, 2011. INHS Collection Databases. http://ellipse.inhs.uiuc.edu:591/INHSCollections/. Accessed September 25, 2011.

  • IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Version 2011.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed October 26, 2011.

  • Jennings, M. R. & M. P. Hayes, 1994. Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepson Herbaria, University of California Berkeley, 2009. Interchange of California Floristics. http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/interchange.html. Accessed September 25, 2011.

  • Jewett, S. G., 1956. Plecoptera. In Usinger, H. P. (ed.), Aquatic Insects of California: With Keys to North American Genera and California Species. University of California Press, Berkeley: 55–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, J. E. & C. C. Swift, 1995. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in Mediterranean-climate California. Ecological Studies 109: 121–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerby, J. L., S. P. D. Riley, L. B. Kats & P. Wilson, 2005. Barriers and flow as limiting factors in the spread of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in southern California streams. Biological Conservation 126: 402–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf, M. G., 1998. Lessons learned from river restoration projects in California. Aquatic Conservation 8: 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieff, B. C., 2000. Mayflies of the United States. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/distr/insects/mfly/index.htm. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online, Jamestown, ND. Accessed September 20, 2011.

  • Kondratieff, B. C. & R. W. Baumann, 2000. Stoneflies of the United States. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/distr/insects/sfly/index.htm. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online, Jamestown, ND. Accessed September 20, 2011.

  • Leech, H. B. & H. P. Chandler, 1956. Aquatic Coleoptera. In Usinger, H. P. (ed.), Aquatic Insects of California: With Keys to North American Genera and California Species. University of California Press, Berkeley: 293–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, T., 2003. Success and failure in a lotic crayfish invasion: the roles of hydrologic variability and habitat alteration. Freshwater Biology 48: 1886–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loarie, S. R., B. E. Carter, K. Hayhoe, S. McMahon, R. Moe, C. A. Knight & D. D. Ackerly, 2008. Climate change and the future of California’s endemic flora. PLoS ONE 3: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolis, T., 2003. Dragonflies and Damselflies of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, M. P., T. Light, J. Feliciano, T. Armstrong, Z. Hogan, J. Viers & P. B. Moyle, 2001. Homogenization of California’s fish fauna through abiotic change. In Lockwood, J. & M. McKinney (eds), Biotic Homogenization. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York: 259–278.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. W. & G. E. Davis, 2001. An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, J. R., K. R. Lips, R. W. Gagliardo, G. B. Rabb, J. P. Collins, J. E. Diffendorfer, P. Daszak, R. Ibanez, K. C. Zippel, D. P. Lawson, K. M. Wright, S. N. Stuart, C. Gascon, H. R. da Silva, P. A. Burrowes, R. L. Joglar, E. La Marca, S. Lotters, L. H. du Preez, C. Weldon, A. Hyatt, J. V. Rodriguez-Mahecha, S. Hunt, H. Robertson, B. Lock, C. J. Raxworthy, D. R. Frost, R. C. Lacy, R. A. Alford, J. A. Campbell, G. Parra-Olea, F. Bolanos, J. J. C. Domingo, T. Halliday, J. B. Murphy, M. H. Wake, L. A. Coloma, S. L. Kuzmin, M. S. Price, K. M. Howell, M. Lau, R. Pethiyagoda, M. Boone, M. J. Lannoo, A. R. Blaustein, A. Dobson, R. A. Griffiths, M. L. Crump, D. B. Wake & E. D. Brodie, 2006. Biodiversity – confronting amphibian declines and extinctions. Science 313: 48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, P. K., 2007. Life history and benthic macroinvertebrates: studies and applications to benthic ecology and systematics. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.

  • Menke, A. S., 1979. The Semi-aquatic and Aquatic Hemiptera of California. Bulletin of the California Insect Survey 21: 1–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R. W., K. W. Cummins & M. B. Berg (eds), 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. D. & W. P. McCafferty, 2008. Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of the Far Western United States. Part 3: California. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 134: 337–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minckley, W. L., D. A. Hendrickson & C. E. Bond, 1986. Geography of western North American fishes: description and relationships to intracontinental tectonism. In Hocutt, C. H. & E. O. Wiley III (eds), The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 519–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, H. A., M. T. K. Arroyo, W. J. Bond, J. Canadell, R. J. Hobbs, S. Lavorel & R. P. Meilson, 2001. Mediterranean-climate ecosystems. In Chapin, F. S. (ed.), Global Biodiversity in a Changing Environment. Springer, New York: 157–199.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. C., 2011. Trichoptera World Checklist. http://entweb.clemson.edu/database/trichopt/ Accessed September 25, 2011.

  • Mount, J. F., 1995. California Rivers and Streams: The Conflict between Fluvial Process and Land Use. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B., 1995. Conservation of native freshwater fishes in the mediterranean-type climate of California, USA – a review. Biological Conservation 72: 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B., 2002. Inland Fishes of California: Revised and Expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B. & J. E. Williams, 1990. Biodiversity loss in the temperate zone – decline of the native fish fauna of California. Conservation Biology 4: 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B., J. V. E. Katz & R. M. Quiñones, 2011. Rapid decline of California’s native inland fishes: a status assessment. Biological Conservation 144: 2414–2423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca & J. Kent, 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nafis, G., 2011. California Herps. http://www.californiaherps.com/. Accessed September 25, 2011.

  • Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. Henry, H. Stevens & H. Wagner, 2011. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.0-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.

  • Olden, J. D., 2006. Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 33: 2027–2038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. M., E. Dinerstein, E. D. Wikramanayake, N. D. Burgess, G. V. N. Powell, E. C. Underwood, J. A. D’Amico, I. Itoua, H. E. Strand, J. C. Morrison, C. J. Loucks, T. F. Allnutt, T. H. Ricketts, Y. Kura, J. F. Lamoreux, W. W. Wettengel, P. Hedao & K. R. Kassem, 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51: 933–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y. D., B. H. Hill, P. H. Husby, R. K. Hall & P. R. Kaufmann, 2006. Relationships between environmental variables and benthic diatom assemblages in California Central Valley streams (USA). Hydrobiologia 561: 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. D., T. F. Cuffney, M. E. Gurtz & M. R. Meador. 1993. Methods for characterizing algal samples as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. United States Geological Survey. Open-File Report 93-409. Raleigh, NC.

  • Pounds, J. A., M. P. L. Fogden & J. H. Campbell, 1999. Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398: 611–615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. E., 1990. Effects of fish in river foodwebs. Science 250: 811–814.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H. & P. R. Ehrlich, 2010. Biological collections and ecological/environmental research: a review, some observations and a look to the future. Biological Reviews 85: 247–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team, 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

  • Rahel, F. J., 2002. Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 291–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H., 2008. Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 138: 131–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H., 2011. Aquatic Insects of California (1956): a landmark event and unique collaboration in benthic biology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H. & M. A. Barnby, 1987. Distribution of the Wilbur Springs Shore Bug (Hemiptera, Saldidae) – a product of abiotic tolerances and biotic constraints. Environmental Entomology 16: 1087–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H. & D. M. Rosenberg, 2010. Recent trends in life history research on benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 27–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H. & K. L. Sorg, 1983. Distribution of the Wilbur Springs Shore Bug (Hemiptera Saldidae): predicting occurrence using water chemistry parameters. Environmental Entomology 12: 1628–1635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H. & J. D. Unzicker, 1975. Water-quality monitoring and aquatic organisms – importance of species identification. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation 47: 9–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H., L. A. Bêche, J. E. Lawrence, R. Mazor, E. P. McElravy, A. P. O’Dowd & S. Carlson, 2012. Long-term population and community patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates and fishes in northern California mediterranean-climate streams. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1373-9.

  • Ricciardi, A. & J. B. Rasmussen, 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13: 1220–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, A. B. & D. C. Rogers, 2011. List of freshwater macroinvertebrate taxa from California and adjacent states including standard taxonomic effort levels. http://www.safit.org/Docs/STE_1_March_2011_7MB.pdf. Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists. March 1.

  • Rogers, D. C., 2005. Identification manual to the freshwater Crustacea of the western United States and adjacent areas encountered during bioassessment. EcoAnalysts, Inc. Technical Publications, Moscow, ID.

  • Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1993. Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, 2011. California Beetle Project. http://www.sbnature.org/collections/invert/entom/cbphomepage.php. Accessed September 20, 2011.

  • Schuh, R. T., S. Hewson-Smith & J. S. Ascher, 2010. Specimen databases: a case study in Entomology using web-based Software. American Entomologist 56: 206–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. W., J. H. Thorne & J. H. Viers, 2006. Biotic homogenization of the California flora in urban and urbanizing regions. Biological Conservation 127: 282–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. B., R. N. Fisher & C. Davidson, 1998. The role of natural history collections in documenting species declines. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13: 27–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shmida, A., 1981. Mediterranean vegetation of California and Israel – similarities and differences. Israel Journal of Botany 30: 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelly, D. K., K. L. Yurewicz, E. E. Werner & R. A. Relyea, 2003. Estimating decline and distributional change in amphibians. Conservation Biology 17: 744–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 2011. Department of Entomology Collections. http://collections.nmnh.si.edu/search/ento/. Accessed September 20, 2011.

  • Sparling, D. W., G. M. Fellers & L. L. McConnell, 2001. Pesticides and amphibian population declines in California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20: 1591–1595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B., N. Bonada & S. Dolédec, 2007. Conservation of taxonomic and biological trait diversity of European stream macroinvertebrate communities: a case for a collective public database. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 3609–3632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. C., 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, 3rd ed. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, J. L., D. V. Peck, A. R. Olsen, D. P. Larsen, J. Van Sickle, C. P. Hawkins, R. M. Hughes, T. R. Whittier, G. A. Lomnicky, A. T. Herlihy, P. R. Kaufman, S. A. Peterson, P. L. Ringold, S. G. Paulsen & R. Blair, 2005a. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) western streams and rivers statistical summary. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report 620/R-05/006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

  • Stoddard, J. L., D. V. Peck, S. G. Paulsen, J. Van Sickle, C. P. Hawkins, A. T. Herlihy, R. M. Hughes, P. R. Kaufman, D. P. Larsen, G. A. Lomnicky, A. R. Olsen, S. A. Peterson, P. L. Ringold, & T. R. Whittier, 2005b. An ecological assessment of western streams and rivers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report 620/R-05/005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

  • Strong, E. E., O. Gargominy, W. F. Ponder & P. Bouchet, 2008. Global diversity of gastropods (Gastropoda; Mollusca) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. W., 1981. Freshwater molluscs of California – a distributional checklist. California Fish and Game 67: 140–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A., M. L. Warren, J. F. Fitzpatrick, H. H. Hobbs, R. F. Jezerinac, W. L. Pflieger & H. W. Robinson, 1996. Conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 21: 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, R. W., 2012. Biodiversity of native bees and crop pollination with emphasis on California. In Gepts, P., T. R. Famula, R. L. Bettinger, S. B. Brush, A. B. Damania, P. E. McGuire & C. O. Qualset (eds), Biodiversity in Agriculture: Domestication, Evolution, and Sustainability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 526–537.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UC Berkeley (University of California Berkeley), 2011. AmphibiaWeb: Information on amphibian biology and conservation. http://amphibiaweb.org/about/index.html. Accessed September 20, 2011.

  • UC Davis (University of California Davis), 2011. California Fish Website. http://calfish.ucdavis.edu/. Accessed September 20, 2011.

  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2011. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. http://www.epa.gov/emap/index.html. Accessed September 25, 2011.

  • USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2011. BioData – Aquatic Bioassessment Data for the Nation. http://aquatic.biodata.usgs.gov/clearCriteria.action. Accessed September 25, 2011.

  • Usinger, R. L. (ed.), 1956. Aquatic Insects of California: With Keys to North American Genera and California Species. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanormelingen, P., E. Verleyen & W. Vyverman, 2008. The diversity and distribution of diatoms: from cosmopolitanism to narrow endemism. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, C. C., 2010. Biodiversity losses and ecosystem function in freshwaters: emerging conclusions and research directions. Bioscience 60: 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D. B. & V. T. Vredenburg, 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 11466–11473.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., 1998. Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biological Conservation 83: 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, H. H., G. R. Hodgson & N. E. Karraker, 2005. Influences of the vegetation mosaic on riparian and stream environments in a mixed forest-grassland landscape in “Mediterranean” northwestern California. Ecography 28: 537–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris & R. J. Neves, 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussles of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18: 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, J. D. S., D. L. Threloff & P. D. N. Hebert, 2006. DNA barcoding reveals extraordinary cryptic diversity in an amphipod genus: implications for desert spring conservation. Molecular Ecology 15: 3073–3082.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DBI 0956389. We also thank our colleagues who provided data and resources necessary to create species lists for this biodiversity summary: R. Baumann, B. Kondratieff, C. Rogers, K. Biggs, T. Manolis, E. DeWalt, K. Cummings, R. Moe, W. Shepard, S. Spaulding, and J. Morse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan E. Ball.

Additional information

Guest editors: N. Bonada And V. H. Resh / Streams in Mediterranean climate regions: lessons learned from the last decade

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ball, J.E., Bêche, L.A., Mendez, P.K. et al. Biodiversity in Mediterranean-climate streams of California. Hydrobiologia 719, 187–213 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1368-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1368-6

Keywords

Navigation