, Volume 702, Issue 1, pp 45–62 | Cite as

Zooplankton dynamics in response to the transition from drought to flooding in four Murray–Darling Basin rivers affected by differing levels of flow regulation

  • Nathan S. P. Ning
  • Ben Gawne
  • Robert A. Cook
  • Daryl L. Nielsen
Primary Research Paper


Extreme low and high flow periods associated with droughts and floods regularly influence many river systems, yet little is known regarding their role in shaping riverine zooplankton communities. This study investigated zooplankton dynamics in response to the transition from drought to flooding in four southern Murray–Darling Basin rivers managed by different levels of flow regulation. Results indicated that the onset of flooding was associated with an increase in the taxon richness and total transport (abundance) of zooplankton in the unregulated Ovens and Kiewa Rivers, and an increase in the total transport of zooplankton in the mildly regulated Broken River. In comparison, no significant flood effects on zooplankton taxon richness or transport were detected in the highly regulated Murray River. This suggests that the flooding was beneficial for enhancing zooplankton abundance in the Ovens, Kiewa and Broken Rivers, whereas any potential benefits were comparatively short-term and/or reduced in the Murray River. We hypothesise that the relatively short-term and/or reduced response of the zooplankton community to the flooding in the Murray River was probably largely due to the occurrence of a hypoxic blackwater event in suppressing zooplankton emergence.


Australia Disturbance Hydrology Productivity Regulated river 



We gratefully acknowledge Professor Marti Anderson for providing advice regarding statistical analysis. We also thank all of The MDFRC staff who assisted with field work and sample processing, particularly Helen Gigney, Rochelle Petrie, John Pengelly, Simon Maffei, Jonathon Thompson, and Karla Williams. This study was funded by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Populations and Communities and the Murray–Darling Basin Authority.


  1. American Public Health Association, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. J., R. N. Gorley & K. R. Clarke, 2008. Permanova+ for Primer: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. National Environment Research Council, Plymouth.Google Scholar
  3. Baranyi, C., T. Hein, C. Holarek, S. Keckeis & F. Schiemer, 2002. Zooplankton biomass and community structure in a Danube River floodplain system: Effects of hydrology. Freshwater Biology 47: 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu, B. K. & F. R. Pick, 1996. Factors regulating phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in temperate rivers. Limnology and Oceanography 41: 1572–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bêche, L. A., P. G. Connors, V. H. Resh & A. M. Merenlender, 2009. Resilience of fishes and invertebrates to prolonged drought in two California streams. Ecography 32: 778–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond, N. R., P. S. Lake & A. H. Arthrington, 2008. The impacts of drought on freshwater ecosystems: an Australian perspective. Hydrobiologia 600: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulton, A. J., 2003. Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages. Freshwater Biology 48: 1173–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulton, A. J. & L. N. Lloyd, 1992. Flooding frequency and invertebrate emergence from dry floodplain sediments of the River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 7: 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunn, S. E., M. C. Thoms, S. K. Hamilton & S. J. Capon, 2006. Flow variability in dryland rivers: boom, bust and the bits in between. River Research and Applications 22: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casper, A. F. & J. H. Thorp, 2007. Diel and lateral patterns of zooplankton distribution in the St. Lawrence River. River Research and Applications 23: 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiew, F. H. S., W. J. Young, W. Cai & J. Teng, 2011. Current drought and future hydroclimate projections in southeast Australia and implications for water resources management. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 25: 601–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, K. & R. M. Warwick, 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd ed. National Environment Research Council, Plymouth.Google Scholar
  13. Cottingham, P., M. J. Stewardson, J. Roberts, L. Metzeling, P. Humphries, T. Hillman & G. Hannan, 2001. Report of the Broken Scientific Panel on the Environmental Condition and Flows of the Broken River and Broken Creek. Co-operative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria.Google Scholar
  14. Covich, A. P., T. A. Crowl & F. N. Scatena, 2003. Effects of extreme low flows on freshwater shrimps in a perennial tropical stream. Freshwater Biology 48: 1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cowx, I. G., W. O. Young & J. M. Hellawell, 1984. The influence of drought on the fish and invertebrate populations of an upland stream in Wales. Freshwater Biology 14: 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crabb, P., 1997. Murray-Darling Basin Resources. The Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  17. CSIRO, 2011. The Millennium Drought and 2010/2011 Floods. South Eastern Australian Climate Initiative (SEACI), Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  18. Geddes, M. C., 1984. Seasonal studies of the zooplankton community of Lake Alexandrina, River Murray, South Australia, and the role of turbidity in determining zooplankton community structure. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 35: 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gehrke, P. C. & J. H. Harris, 2001. Regional-scale effects of flow regulation on lowland riverine fish communities in New South Wales, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 369–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hladyz, S., S. C. Watkins, K. L. Whitworth & D. S. Baldwin, 2011. Flows and hypoxic blackwater events in managed ephemeral river channels. Journal of Hydrology 401: 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Humphries, P. & D. S. Baldwin, 2003. Drought and aquatic ecosystems: an introduction. Freshwater Biology 48: 1141–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. International Standards Organisation, 1994. Water Quality—Measurement of Biochemical Parameters, Spectrophotometric Determination of the Chlorophyll-a Concentration (ISO 10260: 1992(E)) ISO Standards Compendium, Environment—Water Quality, Volume 2—Chemical Methods, 1st edn. International Standards Organisation, France: 308.Google Scholar
  23. Invidia, M., S. Sei & G. Gorbi, 2004. Survival of the copepod Acartia tonsa following egg exposure to near anoxia and to sulfide at different pH values. Marine Ecology Progress Series 276: 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenkins, K. M. & A. J. Boulton, 2007. Detecting impacts and setting restoration targets in arid-zone rivers: aquatic micro-invertebrate responses to reduced floodplain inundation. Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 823–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106:110–127.Google Scholar
  26. King, A. J., 2002. Recruitment ecology of fish in floodplain rivers of the southern Murray Darling Basin, Australia. PhD thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  27. Kingsford, R. T., 2000. Protecting rivers in arid regions or pumping them dry? Hydrobiologia 427: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lair, N., 2006. A review of regulation mechanisms of metazoan plankton in riverine ecosystems: aquatic habitat versus biota. River Research and Applications 22: 567–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lake, P. S., 2000. Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lake, P. S., 2011. Drought and Aquatic Ecosystems: Effects and Responses. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lancaster, J. & A. G. Hildrew, 1993. Characterising in-stream flow refugia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 1663–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lytle, D. A. & N. L. Poff, 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marsh, N. A., M. J. Stewardson & M. J. Kennard, 2003. River Analysis Package. Co-operative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia [available on internet at].
  34. McMahon, T. A. & B. L. Finlayson, 2003. Droughts and anti-droughts: the low flow hydrology of Australian rivers. Freshwater Biology 48: 1147–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newall, P., N. Bate & L. Metzeling, 2006. A comparison of diatom and macroinvertebrate classification of sites in the Kiewa River system, Australia. Hydrobiologia 572: 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nielsen, D. & G. Watson, 2008. The response of epibenthic rotifers and microcrustacean communities to flow manipulations in lowland rivers. Hydrobiologia 603: 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nielsen, D. L., G. Watson & R. Petrie, 2005. Microfaunal communities in three lowland rivers under differing flow regimes. Hydrobiologia 543: 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ning, N. S. P., D. L. Nielsen, T. J. Hillman & P. J. Suter, 2010a. The influence of planktivorous fish on zooplankton communities in riverine slackwaters. Freshwater Biology 55: 360–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ning, N. S. P., D. L. Nielsen, T. J. Hillman & P. J. Suter, 2010b. Microinvertebrate dynamics in riverine slackwater and mid-channel habitats in relation to physico-chemical parameters and food availability. River Research and Applications 26: 279–296.Google Scholar
  40. Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks & J. C. Stromberg, 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47: 769–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reckendorfer, W., H. Keckeis, G. Winkler & F. Schiemer, 1999. Zooplankton abundance in the River Danube, Austria: the significance of inshore retention. Freshwater Biology 41: 583–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reid, M. & R. Ogden, 2009. Factors affecting diatom distribution in floodplain lakes of the southeast Murray Basin, Australia and implications for palaeolimnological studies. Journal of Paleolimnology 41: 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson, C. T. & U. Uehlinger, 2008. Experimental floods cause ecosystem regime shift in a regulated river. Ecological Applications 18: 511–526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rowe, K., 1972. A Study of the Land in the Catchment of the Kiewa River. Soil Conservation Authority, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  45. Saunders, J. F. & W. M. Lewis, 1988. Zooplankton abundance and transport in a tropical white-water river. Hydrobiologia 162: 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saunders, J. F. & W. M. J. Lewis, 1989. Zooplankton abundance in the lower Orinoco River, Venezuela. Limnology and Oceanography 34: 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scherwass, A., T. Bergfeld, A. Schöl, M. Weitere & H. Arndt, 2010. Changes in the plankton community along the length of the River Rhine: Lagrangian sampling during a spring situation. Journal of Plankton Research 32: 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmid-Araya, J. M. & P. E. Schmid, 2000. Trophic relationships: integrating meiofauna into a realistic benthic food web. Freshwater Biology 44: 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schreider, S. Y., P. H. Whetton, A. J. Jakeman & A. B. Pittock, 1997. Runoff modelling for snow-affected catchments in the Australian alpine region, eastern Victoria. Journal of Hydrology 200: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shiel, R. J., 1995. A Guide to Identification of Rotifers, Cladocerans and Copepods from Australian Inland Waters. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  51. Shiel, R. J., J. F. Costelloe, J. R. W. Reid, P. Hudson & J. Powling, 2006. Zooplankton diversity and assemblages in arid zone rivers of the Lake Eyre Basin, Australia. Marine & Freshwater Research 57: 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Søballe, D. M. & B. L. Kimmel, 1987. A large-scale comparison of factors influencing phytoplankton abundance in rivers, lakes, and impoundments. Ecology 68: 1943–1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suren, A. M. & I. G. Jowett, 2006. Effects of floods versus low flows on invertebrates in a New Zealand gravel-bed river. Freshwater Biology 51: 2207–2227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Swan, C. M. & M. A. Palmer, 2000. What drives small-scale spatial patterns in lotic meiofauna communities? Freshwater Biology 44: 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tan, L. & R. J. Shiel, 1993. Responses of billabong rotifer communities to inundation. Hydrobiologia 255(256): 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Twombly, S. & W. M. Lewis Jr., 1987. Zooplankton abundance and species composition in Laguna La Orsinera, a Venezuelan floodplain lake. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement 79: 87–107.Google Scholar
  57. Vannote, R. L., 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vranovský, M., 1995. The effects of current velocity upon the biomass of zooplankton in the River Danube side arms. Biologia 50: 461–464.Google Scholar
  59. Walker, K. F., 1985. A review of the ecological effects of river regulation in Australia. Hydrobiologia 125: 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walker, K. F. & M. C. Thoms, 1993. Environmental-effects of flow regulation on the Lower River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 8: 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watkins, S. C., D. Nielsen, G. P. Quinn & B. Gawne, 2011. The influence of leaf litter on zooplankton in floodplain wetlands: changes resulting from river regulation. Freshwater Biology 56: 2432–2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whitworth, K., D. S. Baldwin & J. L. Kerr, 2012. Drought, floods and water quality: drivers of a severe hypoxic blackwater event in a major river system (the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia). Journal of Hydrology 450–451: 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathan S. P. Ning
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ben Gawne
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert A. Cook
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daryl L. Nielsen
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.The Murray-Darling Freshwater Research CentreWodongaAustralia
  2. 2.La Trobe UniversityWodongaAustralia
  3. 3.CSIRO Land and WaterWodongaAustralia

Personalised recommendations