Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 690, Issue 1, pp 215–226 | Cite as

Parasitism (Trematoda, Digenea) in medusae from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean: medusa hosts, parasite prevalences, and ecological implications

  • Luciana M. Diaz Briz
  • Sergio R. Martorelli
  • Gabriel N. Genzano
  • Hermes W. Mianzan
JELLYFISH BLOOMS

Abstract

Digenean are important endoparasites of fish with complex life cycles; some genera include medusae as secondary hosts. Their transmission to fish occurs when fish prey on these jelly hosts. Fish predation on jellyfish is a widespread phenomenon, even though predation by fish on jellyfish has not been determined through parasitism yet. We hypothesized that medusae with high prevalences of digeneans could be important for their transmission to fish. A total of 48,900 specimens of 50 medusa species were analyzed; 2,181 harbored digeneans. Opechona sp. and Monascus filiformis were the most frequent and abundant parasites with the widest range of hosts. Hemiuridae gen. sp. and Bacciger sp. were found in few specimens of some medusa species. Prevalences were unevenly distributed in the region. Three groups with high prevalence values were identified mainly related to frontal areas: Río de la Plata, Bahía Blanca, and North Patagonian tidal front. Eucheilota ventricularis, Clytia hemisphaerica, Proboscidactyla mutabilis, Liriope tetraphylla, and Aequoerea spp. were the medusae that contributed the most as secondary hosts to M. filiformis and Opechona sp. The high prevalences found in these medusae suggest that may be a fundamental part of the life cycles of both parasites in these areas.

Keywords

Digenean parasites Secondary medusa hosts Final fish hosts Prevalence Estuary and front zones Southwestern Atlantic Ocean 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are especially grateful to Ines Silvia Incorvaia (INIDEP) for providing a critical review on the early manuscript, Joanna Browne (Griffith University School of Environment) for correcting grammar and style, Carolina Rodriguez (UNMdP-CONICET) for identifying medusae, and the librarians of INIDEP for providing literature. This study was supported by the following grants to HM and GG: FONCyT PICT 2006 No 1553, the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) CRN 2076, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (grant GEO-0452325), and Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata EXA 546/11, UNMdP. This is INIDEP Contribution No 1724. L. D. B. is supported by CONICET fellowship.

References

  1. Abdallah, V. D., J. L. Luque, D. R. Alves & A. R. Paraguassú, 2002. Aspectos quantitativos das infrapopulações de metazoários parasitos da cavalinha, Scomber japonicus (Osteichtyes: Scombridae) do litoral do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Revista Universidade Rural, Série Ciências da Vida 22: 103–107.Google Scholar
  2. Acha, E. M., H. W. Mianzan, R. A. Guerrero, M. Favero & J. Bava, 2004. Marine fronts at the continental shelves of austral South America. Physical and ecological processes. Journal of Marine Systems 44: 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alarcos, A. J., J. A. Etchegoin & F. Cremonte, 2008. Redescription of Bacciger microacetabularis (Martorelli & Suriano, 1983) nov. comb. parasitizing Paralichthys orbignyanus (Pisces, Paralichthyidae) from Argentina. Acta Parasitologica 53: 365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez Colombo, G., H. W. Mianzan & A. Madirolas, 2003. Acoustic characterization of gelatinous plankton aggregations: four study cases from the argentine continental shelf. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60: 650–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amato, J. F. R., 1982. Digenetic trematodes of percoid fishes of Florianópolis, southern Brazil – Fellodistomidae, Monascidae, Diplangidae, with description of two new species. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 42: 681–699.Google Scholar
  6. Amato, J. F. R., 1983. Digenetic trematodes of percoid fishes of Florianópolis, southern Brazil – Homalometridae, Lepocreadiidae and Opecoelidae, with the description of seven new species. Revista Brasilera de Biologia 43: 73–98.Google Scholar
  7. Arai, M. N., 1988. Interactions of fish and pelagic coelenterates. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 1913–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arai, M. N., 2005. Predation on pelagic coelenterates: a review. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85: 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arai, M. N., D. W. Welch, A. L. Dumsmuir, M. C. Jacobs & A. R. Ladouceur, 2003. Digestion of pelagic Ctenophora and Cnidaria by fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 825–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ates, R. M. L., 1988. Medusivorous fishes, a review. Zoologische Mededelingen 62: 29–42.Google Scholar
  11. Ates, R. M. L., 1991. Predation on Cnidaria by vertebrates other than fishes. Hydrobiologia 216–217: 305–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Averbuj, A. & F. Cremonte, 2010. Parasitic castration of Buccinanops cochlidium (Gastropoda: Nassariidae) caused by a lepocreadiid digenean in San José Gulf, Argentina. Journal of Helminthology 84: 381–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz & A. W. Shostak, 1997. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al., revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83: 575–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cartwright, P., N. M. Evans, C. W. Dunn, A. C. Marques, M. P. Miglietta, M. P. Schuchert & A. G. Collins, 2008. Phylogenetics of Hydroidolina (Hydrozoa: Cnidaria). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 88: 1663–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman, M. G. & A. J. Underwood, 1999. Ecological patterns in multivariate assemblages: information and interpretation of negative values in ANOSIM tests. Marine Ecology Progress Series 180: 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd ed. PRIMER-E, Plymouth.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, A. G., B. Bentlage, A. Lindner, D. Lindsay, S. H. D. Haddock, G. Jarms, J. L. Norenburg, T. Jankowski & P. Cartwright, 2008. Phylogenetics of Trachylina (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) with new insights on the evolution of some problematical taxa. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 88: 1673–1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costello, J. H. & H. W. Mianzan, 2003. Sampling field distributions of Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora, Lobata): planktonic or benthic methods? Journal of Plankton Research 25: 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cremonte, F. & N. H. Sardella, 1997. The parasito fauna of Scomber japoniscus Houttuyn, 1782 (Pisces: Scombridae) in two zones of the Argentine Sea. Fisheries Research 31: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daponte, M. C., A. A. Gil de Pertierra, M. A. Palmieri & M. Ostrowski de Nuñez, 2006. Parasite infections (Trematoda, Digenea) of Sagitta friderici (chaetognatha) from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean: prevalence and distribution. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 71: 225–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daponte, M. C., A. A. Gil de Pertierra, M. A. Palmieri & M. Ostrowski de Nuñez, 2008. Monthly occurrence of parasites of the chaetognath Sagitta friderici of Mar del Plata, Argentina. Journal of Plankton Research 30: 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandes, B. M. M., A. Kohn & R. M. Pinto, 1985. Aspidogastrid and digenetic trematodes parasites of marine fishes of the coast of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 45: 109–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Genzano, G. N., H. W. Mianzan & J. Bouillon, 2008. Hydromedusae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from the temperate southwestern Atlantic Ocean: a review. Zootaxa 1750: 1–18.Google Scholar
  24. Girola, C. V., S. R. Martorelli & N. H. Sardella, 1992. Presencia de Metacercarias de Monascus filiformis (Digenea, Fellodistomidae) en hidromedusas del Océano Atlántico Sur. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 65: 409–415.Google Scholar
  25. Guagliardo, S. E., C. B. Schwerdt, S. R. Martorelli, N. A. Galeano & R. D. Tanzola, 2010. Digenean trematodes of Seriolella porosa (Pisces, Centrolophidae) in San Matías Gulf, Argentina. Acta Parasitologica 55: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohn, A., B. M. M. Fernandes & S. C. Cohen, 2007. South American Trematodes Parasites of Fishes. Imprinta Express Ltda, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  27. Køie, M., 1975. On the morphology and life history of Opechona bacillaris (Molin, 1859) Loos, 1907 (Trematoda Lepocreadiidae). Ophelia 13: 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lauckner, G., 1980. Diseases of Ctenophora. In Kinne, O. (ed.), Diseases of Marine Animals. Vol. 1. General Aspects, Protozoa to Gastropoda. John Wiley and Sons, New York: 167–253.Google Scholar
  29. Lebour, M. V., 1916. Medusae as hosts for larval trematodes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 11: 57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marcogliese, D. J., 1995. The role of zooplankton in the transmission of helminth parasites to fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 5: 336–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marcogliese, D. J., 2002. Food webs and the transmission of parasites to marine fish. Parasitology 124: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marcogliese, D. J., 2004. Parasites: small players with crucial roles in the ecological theater. EcoHealth Journal Consortium 1: 151–164.Google Scholar
  33. Marcogliese, D. J., 2005. Ecology. In Rohde, K. (ed.), Marine Parasitology. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood: 279–321.Google Scholar
  34. Marques, A. C. & A. G. Collins, 2004. Cladistic analysis of Medusozoa and cnidarian evolution. Invertebrate Biology 123: 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martorelli, S. R., 1991. Primera cita de una Cercaria Tricocerca parásita de Dorsanum Moniliferum (Mollusca: Buccinidae) para el Atlántico sud-Occidental. Aportes al conocimiento de su ciclo de vida. Neotropica 37: 57–65.Google Scholar
  36. Martorelli, S. R., 1996. First record of encysted metacercariae in hydrozoan jellyfishes and ctenophores of the Southern Atlantic. Journal of Parasitology 82: 352–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Martorelli, S. R., 2001. Digenea parasites of jellyfish and ctenophores of the Southern Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 451: 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martorelli, S. R. & F. Cremonte, 1998. A proposed three-host life history of Monascus filiformis (Rudolphi, 1819) (Digenea: Fellodistomidae) in the southwest Atlantic Ocean. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76: 1198–1203.Google Scholar
  39. Mianzan, H. W. & R. A. Guerrero, 2000. Environmental patterns and biomass distribution of gelatinous macrozooplankton. Three study cases in the South-western Atlantic Ocean. Scientia Marina 64: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mianzan, H. W., N. Marí, B. Prenski & F. Sanchez, 1996. Fish predation on neritic ctenophores from the Argentina continental shelf: a neglected food resource? Fisheries Research 27: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mianzan, H. W., M. Pájaro, G. Alvarez Colombo & A. Madirolas, 2001. Feeding on survival-food: gelatinous plankton as a source of food for anchovies. Hydrobiologia 451: 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mianzan, H. W., P. Martos, J. H. Costello & R. A. Guerrero, 2010. Avoidance of hydrodynamically mixed environments by Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora: Lobata) in open-sea populations from Patagonia, Argentina. Hydrobiologia 645: 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morandini, A. C., S. R. Martorelli, A. C. Marques & F. Lang da Silveira, 2005. Digenean metacercaria (Trematoda, Digenea, Lepocreadiidae) parasitizing “coelenterates” (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa and Ctenophora) from southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 53: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pereira, J. Jr., B. M. M. Fernades & R. B. Robaldo, 2000. Digenea (Trematoda) of Micropogonias furnieri (Desmarest) (Perciformes, Sciaenidae) from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 17: 681–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rocka, A., 2006. Helminths of Antarctic fishes: life cycle biology, specificity and geographical distribution. Acta Parasitologica 51: 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rohde, K., 1993. Ecology of Marine Parasites: An Introduction to Marine Parasitology, 2nd ed. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  47. Stunkard, H. W., 1967. The life cycle and developmental stages of a digenetic trematode whose unencysted metacercarial stages occur in medusae. Biological Bulletin 133: 488.Google Scholar
  48. Stunkard, H. W., 1969. The morphology and life-history of Neopechona pyriforme (Linton, 1900) N. Gen., N. Comb. (Trematoda: Lepocreadiidae). Biological Bulletin 136: 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Travassos, L., J. F. T. Freitas & P. F. Bührnheim, 1965. Trematódeos de peixes do litoral capixaba: Monascus netoi sp. n., parasita de vento leste. Atas da Sociedade de Biologia do Rio de Janeiro 9: 46–48.Google Scholar
  50. Travassos, L., J. F. T. Freitas & P. F. Bührnheim, 1967. Relatório da excursão do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz ao estado do Espíritu Santo em novembro de 1964. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Mello Leitão 31: 1–5.Google Scholar
  51. Wallet, M. & A. Kohn, 1987. Trematodes parasites de poissons marins du littoral de Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 82: 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiebe, P. H. & M. C. Benfield, 2003. From the Hensen net toward four-dimensional biological oceanography. Progress in Oceanography 56: 7–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciana M. Diaz Briz
    • 1
    • 4
  • Sergio R. Martorelli
    • 2
  • Gabriel N. Genzano
    • 1
    • 4
  • Hermes W. Mianzan
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Estación Costera Nágera, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, CONICETMar del PlataArgentina
  2. 2.Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y Vectores (CEPAVE)CCT LA PLATA, CONICETLa PlataArgentina
  3. 3.Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)CONICETMar del PlataArgentina
  4. 4.Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC)Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)Mar del PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations