Bryozoan assemblages on hard substrata: species abundance distribution and competition for space
- 185 Downloads
Bryozoans are colonial invertebrates that often dominate epibenthic assemblages on the lower surfaces of hard substrata. Competition among neighbouring organisms is usually a critical process regulating biodiversity, and hard substrata have proved to be a suitable model habitat to analyse spatial interactions. We explored the relationships among abundance, species richness, diversity, competitive ability, coverage, available surface, depth and substratum size in an assemblage of bryozoans encrusting pebbles and cobbles in a bank off the eastern mouth of the Strait of Magellan. We also tested whether overgrowth competition can be regarded as hierarchical, and whether the species abundance distribution shows a mode of rare species and a decreasing frequency of increasingly abundant species. Abundance, species richness, diversity and overgrowth competition were highest on the largest substrata. Smaller pebbles tended to be encrusted by the commonest bryozoans, while the rarest species were mainly found on relatively larger clasts. A high proportion of the lower surfaces of most substrata was available for growth. Diversity values of relatively shallow stations were lower than expected under Caswell’s neutral model. Interspecific competition was hierarchical, but the abundance of colonies was not related to the competitive ability of each species. The species abundance distribution was bimodal, with a main mode of rare species and a second one partly composed of relatively abundant bryozoans with poor competitive abilities. This study shows that even in an encrusting assemblage where competition is hierarchical, the weakest competitors persist and the dominant species are far from being capable of monopolizing space.
KeywordsOvergrowth competition Encrusting bryozoans Species abundance distributions Commonness and rarity of species Hard substrata Strait of Magellan
Néstor Landoni helped us in various stages of this study. We are grateful to the crew of the PSV Golondrina de Mar for assistance during the field survey and to CONICET for financial support (PIP 2010-2012 No. 11220090100291).
- Buss, L. W., 1979. Habitat selection, directional growth and spatial refuges: why colonial animals have more hiding places. In Larwood, G. & B. R. Rosen (eds), Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms. Academic Press, London and New York: 459–497.Google Scholar
- Clarke, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth.Google Scholar
- Jackson, J. B. C., 1979a. Morphological strategies of sessile animals. In Larwood, G. & B. R. Rosen (eds), Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms. Academic Press, London and New York: 499–555.Google Scholar
- McGill, B. J., R. S. Etienne, J. S. Gray, D. Alonso, M. J. Anderson, H. K. Benecha, M. Dornelas, B. J. Enquist, J. L. Green, F. He, A. H. Hurlbert, A. E. Magurran, P. A. Marquet, B. A. Maurer, A. Ostling, C. U. Soykan, K. I. Ugland & E. P. White, 2007. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecology Letters 10: 995–1015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McKinney, F. K., 1993. A faster-paced world?: contrasts in biovolume and life-process rates in cyclostome (Class Stenolaemata) and cheilostome (Class Gymnolaemata) bryozoans. Paleobiology 19: 335–351.Google Scholar
- Michelato, A., E. Accerboni & P. Berger, 1991. Current meter observations in the eastern and central sectors of the Strait of Magellan. Bollettino di Oceanologia Teorica ed Applicata 9: 261–271.Google Scholar
- Okamura, B., J. G. Harmelin & J. B. C. Jackson, 2001. Refuges revisited. Enemies versus flow and feeding as determinants of sessile animal distribution and form. In Jackson, J. B. C., S. Lidgard & F. K. McKinney (eds), Evolutionary Patterns. Growth, Form and Tempo in the Fossil Record. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 61–93.Google Scholar
- Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry, 2nd edn. WH Freeman & Co, New York.Google Scholar
- Stebbing, A. R. D., 1973b. Observations on colony overgrowth and spatial competition. In Larwood, G. P. (ed.), Living and Fossil Bryozoa. Recent Advances in Research. Academic Press, London and New York: 173–183.Google Scholar