Potential pathways of invasion and dispersal of Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz 1865 in the Baltic Sea
- 142 Downloads
The rapid spread of Mnemiopsis leidyi across the entire Baltic Sea after its first observation in 2006 gave rise to the question of its invasion pathway and the possible vector of its transport. To investigate pathways of M. leidyi invasion, the years 2005–2008 have been simulated by a three-dimensional coupled sea ice-ocean model of the Baltic Sea. In addition, a Lagrangian particle-tracking model has been utilized to test possible transport routes of this invader for 2006/2007. Based on the model, we exclude advection from the Kattegat as the main area of origin of M. leidyi and further spreading through the entire Baltic Sea. To explain the dispersion of M. leidyi in 2007 an earlier invasion already in 2005 is most probable. Alternatively, an invasion originating from main harbors with high ship traffic could also be a potential pathway. Drift simulations with drifter release in the main harbors are in good agreement with the observed distribution pattern of M. leidyi.
KeywordsInvasive species Range expansion Mnemiopsis leidyi Lagrangian particle-tracking model Baltic Sea
Authors are grateful to J. C. Molinero for his valuable comments on the article. This work was financed by IFM-GEOMAR.
- Carlton, J. T., 1999. The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world’s oceans. In Sandlund, O. T. S. P. & A. Viken (eds) Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 195–212.Google Scholar
- Elton, C. S., 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Gorokhova, E., M. Lehtiniemi, S. Viitasalo-Frösen & H. D. Haddock, 2009. Molecular evidence for the occurrence of ctenophore Mertensia ovum in the northern Baltic Sea and implications for the status of the Mnemiopsis leidyi invasion. Limnology and Oceanography 54: 2025–2033.Google Scholar
- Hinrichsen, H. H., A. Lehmann, C. Petereit & J. Schmidt, 2007. Correlation analysis of Baltic Sea winter water mass formation and its impact on secondary and tertiary production. Oceanologia 49(3): 381–395.Google Scholar
- Jackson, J. B. C., M. X. Kirby, W. H. Berger, K. A. Bjorndal, L. W. Botsford, B. J. Bourque, R. H. Bradbury, R. Cooke, J. Erlandson, J. A. Estes, T. P. Hughes, S. Kidwell, C. B. Lange, H. S. Lenihan, J. M. Pandolfi, C. H. Peterson, R. S. Steneck, M. J. Tegner & R. Warner, 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293: 629–637.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinlan, B. P. & A. Hasting, 2005. Rates of population spread and geographic range expansion. In Sax, D. F., J. J. Stachowicz & S. D. Gaines (eds) Species Invasions, Insights into Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA: 480 pp.Google Scholar
- Lehmann, A., W. Krauss & H.-H. Hinrichsen, 2002. Effects of remote and local atmospheric forcing on circulation and upwelling in the Baltic Sea. Tellus 54A: 299–316.Google Scholar
- Lehtiniemi, M., J. P. Pääkkönen, J. Flinkman, T. Katajisto, E. Gorokhova, M. Karjalainen, S. Viitasalo & H. Björk, 2007. Distribution and abundance of the American comb jelly (Mnemiopsis leidyi) – a rapid invasion to the northern Baltic Sea during 2007. Aquatic Invasions 2: 445–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lockwood, J. L., M. F. Hoopes & M. P. Marchetti, 2007. Invasion Ecology. Blackwell publishing, Oxford, UK: 304 pp.Google Scholar
- Novotny, K., K. G. Liebsch, R. Dietrich & A. Lehmann, 2005. Combination of sea-level observations and an oceanographic model for geodetic applications in the Baltic Sea. In Sanso, F. (ed.), A Window on the Future of Geodesy, Vol. 128 of Springer Series of IAG Symposia. Springer, New York: 195–200.Google Scholar