Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 644, Issue 1, pp 207–216 | Cite as

Optical properties of a tropical estuary during wet and dry conditions in the Nha Phu estuary, Khanh Hoa Province, south-east Vietnam

  • Lars Chresten Lund-Hansen
  • Doan Nhu Hai
  • Nguyen Ngoc Lam
  • Morten Holtegaard Nielsen
Primary research paper

Abstract

There has been a strong research focus on optical properties in temperate estuaries but very much less in tropical estuaries. These properties comprise light and beam attenuation dominated by suspended particulate matter, Chl a, and CDOM. Spatially and temporally distributed data on optical properties in a tropical wet and dry estuary are compared and discussed in relation to those of temperate estuaries. Sampling in the Nha Phu estuary, Vietnam, consisted of five stations on a transect from head to mouth that was sampled four times during dry conditions and three times during wet conditions between May 2006 and April 2008. Methods comprised CTD, optical measurements, and water sampling for suspended matter, Chl a, and CDOM. Results showed high light attenuation—K d(PAR)—in wet conditions and low in dry. K d(PAR) was highest at the estuary head and lower in the outer part. Spatial and temporal variations in K d(PAR) were in general dominated by variations in suspended particulate matter concentrations in both wet and dry conditions. Chl a concentrations were low and showed no strong variations between wet and dry conditions. CDOM absorption coefficients were higher in wet conditions with high values at the head and lower in the central part of the estuary. The depth of the photic zone was reduced by up to 50% during wet conditions. A residence time in the estuary of 5–6 days was derived from the rate of change of K d(PAR) after a period of heavy rain and discharge of freshwater into the estuary. This complied with a residence time of four and a half days derived from a basic physical relation. Optical properties were in general comparable to temperate estuaries in dry conditions although Chl a concentrations were lower in Nha Phu. A second distinctive point, as compared to temperate estuaries, was the episodic character with days of strong rainfall followed by longer periods of dry weather. All sampling, both wet and dry, was carried out in the dry season which implies a less definitive perception of wet and dry seasons.

Keywords

Tropical wet and dry estuary Diffuse attenuation coefficient Kd(PAR) Suspended particulate matter Chl a CDOM Vietnam 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Director Bui Hong Long and staff at the Institute of Oceanography, Nha Trang, Vietnam, are thanked for their good cooperation and fine hospitality during the project “Hydrodynamics of Wet and Dry Estuaries” financially supported by Danish Research Council contract. Nr. 272-06-0582. Mr. Thrien is thanked for help during the field work.

References

  1. Barthel, K., R. Rosland & N. C. Thai, 2009. Modelling the circulation on the continental shelf of the province Khanh Hoa in Vietnam. Journal of Marine Systems 77: 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowers, D. G. & E. G. Mitchelson-Jacobs, 1996. Inherent optical properties of the Irish Sea determined from underwater irradiance measurements. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 43: 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers, D. G., G. E. L. Harker, P. S. D. Smith & P. Tett, 2000. Optical properties of a region of freshwater influence—The Clyde Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 50: 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christian, D. & Y. P. Sheng, 2003. Relative influence of various water quality parameters on light attenuation in Indian River Lagoon. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57: 961–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cloern, J. E., 1987. Turbidity as a control on phytoplankton biomass and productivity. Continental Shelf Research 7: 1367–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cloern, J. E., 1991. Annual variations in river flow and primary production in the South san Francisco Bay estuary (USA). In Elliot, M. & Ducrotoy (eds), Estuaries and Coasts: Spatial and Temporal Intercomparisons. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg: 91–96.Google Scholar
  7. Cravo, A., M. Madureira, H. Felicia & M. J. Bebianno, 2006. Impact of outflow from the Guadiana River on the distribution of suspended particulate matter and nutrients in the adjacent coastal zone. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 70: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Toro, D. M., 1978. Optics of turbid estuarine waters: approximations and applications. Water Research 12: 1059–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dyer, K. R., 1997. Estuaries—A Physical Introduction. Wiley, Chichester: 195 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Falkowski, P.G. & J.A. Raven, 2007. Aquatic Photosynthesis, 2nd ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton: 351 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Fujiki, T. & S. Taguchi, 2002. Variability in chlorophyll a specific absorption coefficient in marine phytoplankton as a function of cell size and irradiance. Journal of Plankton Research 24: 859–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallegos, C. L., D. L. Corell & J. W. Pierce, 1990. Modelling spectral diffuse attenuation, absorption, and scattering coefficients in a turbid estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 35: 1486–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Højerslev, N. K., N. Holt & T. Aarup, 1996. Optical measurements in the North Sea Baltic Sea transition zone. I. On the origin of the deep water in the Kattegat. Continental Shelf Research 16: 1329–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jerlov, N. G. 1976. Marine Optics, 2nd ed. Elsevier Oceanography Series, 14. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 371 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Jørgensen, B. B., 1996. Case study—Aarhus Bay. In Jørgensen, B. B., K. Richardson (eds) Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Vol. 52. American Geophysical Union, Washington: 241 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Kirk, J. T. O., 1994. Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 401 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kostoglidis, A., C. B. Pattiaratchi & D. P. Hamilton, 2005. CDOM and its contribution to the underwater light climate of a shallow, microtidal estuary in South-western Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 63: 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lund-Hansen, L. C., 2004. Diffuse attenuation coefficients K d(PAR) at the estuarine North Sea Baltic Sea transition: time-series, partitioning, absorption, and scattering. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 61: 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lund-Hansen, L. C. & H. M. Sørensen, 2009. Parameterization of surface irradiance and primary production in Århus Bay, SW Kattegat, Baltic Sea. Hydrobiologia 620: 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lund-Hansen, L.C., T.J. Andersen, M.H. Nielsen & M. Pejrup, 2010. Suspended matter,Chl-a, CDOM, grain-sizes, and optical properties in the arctic fjord-type estuary, Kangerlussuaq, West Greenland during summer. Estuaries and Coasts (Accepted)Google Scholar
  21. McMahon, T. G., R. C. T. Raine, T. Fast, L. Kies & J. W. Patching, 1992. Phytoplankton biomass, light attenuation and mixing in the Shannon estuary, Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological sAssociation U.K. 72: 709–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pfannkuche, J., 2002. Optical properties of Otago shelf waters: south island New Zealand. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 55: 613–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Philips, E. J., T. C. Lynch & S. Badylak, 1995. Chlorophyll a, tripton, color, and light availability in a shallow tropical inner-shelf lagoon, Florida Bay, FL. Marine Ecology Progress Series 127: 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith, R. C. & K. S. Baker, 1981. Optical properties of the clearest natural waters (200–800 nm). Applied Optics 20: 177–184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Strickland, J. D. H. & T. R. Parson, 1972. A practical Handbook of Seawater Analyses. Ottawa, Canada: 235 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Van Maren, D. S. & P. Hoekstra, 2004. Seasonal variation of hydrodynamics and sediment dynamics in a shallow subtropical estuary: the Ba Lat River, Vietnam. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 60: 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vant, W. N., 1990. Causes of light attenuation in nine New Zealand estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 31: 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vant, W. N. & R. J. Davies-Colley, 1986. Relative importance of clarity determinants in Lakes Okaro and Rotorua. New Zealand Journal of Marine Freshwater Research 20: 355–363.Google Scholar
  29. Wolanski, E., 2007. Estuarine Ecohydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 157 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Wolanski, E., N. N. Huan, L. T. Daos, H. N. Nhan & N. N. Thuy, 1996. Fine-sediment dynamics in the Mekong River Estuary, Vietnam. Estuarine, Costal and Shelf Science 43: 565–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang, S. P. & B. Wang, 2008. Global summer monsoon rainy seasons. International Journal of Climatology 28: 1563–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Chresten Lund-Hansen
    • 1
  • Doan Nhu Hai
    • 2
  • Nguyen Ngoc Lam
    • 2
  • Morten Holtegaard Nielsen
    • 3
  1. 1.Marine Ecology, Department of Biological SciencesAarhus UniversityÅrhus CDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of OceanographyNha TrangVietnam
  3. 3.Arctic Technology Center, Department of Civil EngineeringTechnical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations