Extreme trophic segregation between sympatric fish species: the case of small sized body Aphyocharax in the Brazilian Pantanal
Interspecific differences in diet of the two sympatric fish species of the subfamily Aphyocharacinae were investigated. Both were sampled monthly (March 2000 to February 2001) during the rainy and dry season in North region of the Pantanal. Aphyocharax anisitsi was an invertivorous/insectivorous species, feeding mainly on aquatic insects during the rainy season and terrestrial insects in the dry season. Aphyocharax dentatus remained a piscivorous regardless of the hydrological season. Low feeding-overlap values, 0.079 in the dry season and no overlap in the rainy season were observed. The diet-breadth values for each species were low (less than 0.1) except for A. anisitsi in the lake during the dry season (0.4). A detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) summarized the diet similarity patterns: in DCA 1, it was observed that fish prey grouped A. dentatus in the lower scores, and insect prey grouped A. anisitsi in the higher scores. A two-way ANOVA showed that the diets differed significantly between the species. Our results show a clear trophic segregation between these species, supporting the niche concept that presumes that differences between sympatric species must exist, to allow their coexistence. Besides extreme segregation, it was clear that A. dentatus is a piscivorous fish, despite its low size (until 72 mm). This finding counteracts the current view about food web structure that poses a direct and positive relationship between body size and trophic position.
KeywordsAphyocharax anisitsi Aphyocharax dentatus Coexistence Diet Floodplain
We express our appreciation to Nupélia (Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aqüicultura) and to PEA (Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais) for their financial and logistical support. To CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for a postgraduate fellowship and to Sidinei Magela Thomaz for helpful suggestions. The language (English) was revised by Janet W. Reid (JWR Associates).
- Agostinho, C. S., N. S. Hahn & E. E. Marques, 2003. Patterns of food resource use by two congeneric species of piranhas (Serrasalmus) on the Upper Paraná River floodplain. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63: 177–182.Google Scholar
- Britski, H. A., K. Z. S. Silimon & B. S. Lopes, 2007. Peixes do pantanal—Manual de identificação, 2nd ed. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária—EMBRAPA, Brasília.Google Scholar
- Chase, J. M. & M. A. Leibold, 2003. Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Chernoff, B., P. W. Willink & A. Machado-Allison, 2004. Spatial partitioning of fishes in the río Paraguay, Paraguay. Interciencia 29: 183–192.Google Scholar
- Gause, G. F., 1934. The struggle for existence. Hafner Publishing Company, London.Google Scholar
- Gerking, S. D., 1994. Feeding ecology. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
- Gotelli, N. J. & G. L. Entsminger, 2007. EcoSim: null models software for ecology, version 7. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. Jericho, VT 05465. http://garyentsminger.com/ecosim.htm.
- Goulding, M., 1980. The fishes and the forest. University of California Press, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Graça, W. J. & C. S. Pavanelli, 2007. Peixes da planície de inundação do alto rio Paraná e áreas adjacentes. EDUEM, Maringá.Google Scholar
- Hahn, N. S. & V. E. Loureiro-Crippa, 2006. Estudo comparativo da dieta, hábitos alimentares e morfologia trófica de duas espécies simpátricas, de peixes de pequeno porte, associados à macrófitas aquáticas. Acta Scientiarium Biological Sciences 28: 359–364.Google Scholar
- Hahn, N. S., R. Fugi, V. L. L. Almeida, M. R. Russo & V. E. Loureiro, 1997. Dieta e atividade alimentar de peixes do reservatório de Segredo. In Agostinho, A. A. & L. C. Gomes (eds), Resevatório de Segredo: bases ecológicas para o manejo. EDUEM, Maringá: 141–162.Google Scholar
- MacCune, B. & M. J. Mefford, 1997. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 3.0. MjM Software Design, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
- Mittermeier R. G., F. M. Hoffmann, J. Pilgrim, T. Brooks, P. R. Gil, C. Mittermeier & J. Lamoreux, 2005. Hotspots revisitados—as regiões biologicamente mais ricas e ameaçadas do planeta. Conservation International do Brazil. Disponível em:<http://www.conservation.org.br/publicacoes/index.php?t=2>. 17 dez 2008.
- Russo, M. R. & N. S. Hahn, 2006. Importance of zooplankton in the diet of a small fish in lagoons of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 18: 357–366.Google Scholar
- Schaefer, S. A., 1998. Conflict and resolution: impact of new taxa on phylogenetic studies of the neotropical cascudinhos (Siluroidei: Loricariidae). In Malabarba, L. R., R. E. Reis, R. P. Vari, Z. M. Lucena & C. A. S. Lucena (eds), Phylogeny and classification of neotropical fishes. Edipucrs, Porto Alegre: 375–400.Google Scholar
- StatSoft Inc., 2005. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.1. www.statsoft.com.
- Townsend, C. R., M. Begon & J. L. Harper, 2006. Fundamentos em Ecologia, 2nd ed. Artmed, São Paulo.Google Scholar