Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 599, Issue 1, pp 161–168 | Cite as

Validation of the MERIS products on large European lakes: Peipsi, Vänern and Vättern

  • Krista Alikas
  • Anu Reinart
ELLS 2007

Abstract

The Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS/Envisat) was launched in March 2002 for coastal zone monitoring. Preliminary data from MERIS show that its imagery of large lakes is superior to that of other common ocean colour sensors. The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the MERIS data on large European lakes, Vänern and Vättern in Sweden and Peipsi in Estonia/Russia. In these lakes, coloured dissolved organic matter (CDOM) can be a major contributor to the optical properties of the water. Another characteristic of the waters under investigation is the large temporal and spatial variability in the concentrations of chlorophyll (C Chl) and suspended sediments (C TSS). Potentially toxic cyanobacterial blooms occur in Lake Peipsi in late summer. We have compared the MERIS products from the latest reprocessing (finished in March 2006) with available in situ data. There is a reasonably good correlation between the MERIS algal_2 product and the measured C chl over all three lakes, but no correlation was found for other optically active substances. A significant portion of the pixels (up to 90%) are flagged as invalid results after atmospheric correction.

Keywords

Remote sensing MERIS Large lakes Optical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank ESA/ENVISAT, EO Help Desk and Brockmann Consult for the production and distribution of images. This study is supported by the Estonian Science Foundation Grant’s 6814 and 5738 and the Swedish National Space Board grant 132/03. We thank the Võrtsjärve Limnological Station for water sample analyses.

References

  1. Arst, H., 2003. Optical properties and remote sensing of multicomponental water bodies. Praxis Publishing, Springer, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  2. ATBD_2_12. Pigment index, sediment and gelbstoff retrieval from directional water-leaving reflectances using inverse modelling technique. http://www.envisat.esa.int/instruments/meris/pdf/atbd_2_12.pdf.
  3. Dekker, A. G., R. J. Vos & S. W. M. Peters, 2002. Analytical algorithms for lake water TSM estimation for retrospective analyses of TM and SPOT sensor data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23: 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doerffer, R., 2006. MERIS Case I validation. Proceedings of the Second Working Meeting on MERIS and AATSR Calibration and Geophysical Validation. CD SP-615.Google Scholar
  5. Krasemann, H., 2006. Case II Water Validation. Proceedings of the Second Working Meeting on MERIS and AATSR Calibration and Geophysical Validation. CD SP-615.Google Scholar
  6. Kvarnäs, H., 2001. Morphometry and hydrology of the four large lakes of Sweden. Ambio 30: 467–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lindell, T., D. Pierson, G. Premazzi & E. Ziliolli (eds), 1999. Manual for Monitoring European Lakes Using Remote Sensing Techniques. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  8. Moore, G. F., J. Aiken & J. Lavender, 1999. The atmospheric correction of water colour and the quantitative retrieval of suspended particulate matter in Case II waters: application to MERIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20: 1713–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nõges T. (ed.), 2001. Lake Peipsi. Meteorology, Hydrology, Hydrochemistry. Sulemees Publishers, Tartu, Estonia.Google Scholar
  10. Peters, S., 2006. MERIS Water Product Validation Case II waters. Validation at the North Sea. Proceedings of the Second Working Meeting on MERIS and AATSR Calibration and Geophysical Validation. CD SP-615.Google Scholar
  11. Pierson, D. C. & N. Strömbeck, 2000. A modelling approach to evaluate preliminary remote sensing algorithms: Use of water quality data from Swedish Great Lakes. Geophysica 36: 177–202.Google Scholar
  12. Reinart, A., B. Paavel, D. Pierson & N. Strömbeck, 2004a. Inherent and apparent optical properties of Lake Peipsi. Estonian Boreal Environment Research 9: 429–445.Google Scholar
  13. Reinart, A., B. Paavel & L. Tuvikene, 2004b. Effect of coloured dissolved organic matter on the attenuation of photosynthetically active radiation in Lake Peipsi. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Biology. Ecology 53: 88–105.Google Scholar
  14. Sathyendranath, S. (ed.), 2000. Remote sensing of ocean colour in coastal and other optically complex waters. Report of the International Ocean Colour Coordinating Group, No. 3. IOCCG, Dartmouth, Canada.Google Scholar
  15. Schiller, H. & R. Doerffer, 1999. Neural network for emulation of an inverse model operational derivation of Case II water properties from MERIS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20: 1735–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Strömbeck, N. & D. Pierson, 2001. The effects of variability in the inherent optical properties on the estimations of the chlorophyll a by remote sensing in Swedish freshwaters. The Science of the Total Environment 268: 123–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Willén, E., 2001. Phytoplankton and water quality characterization: Experiences from the Swedish large lakes Mälaren, Hjälmaren, Vättern and Vänern. Ambio 30: 529–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tartu ObservatoryToravere, TartumaaEstonia

Personalised recommendations