Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 598, Issue 1, pp 163–174 | Cite as

Blackfly assemblages (Diptera, Simuliidae) of the Carpathian river: habitat characteristics, longitudinal zonation and eutrophication

  • Daniela Illéšová
  • Jozef Halgoš
  • Il’ja Krno
Primary research paper

Abstract

Investigations were carried out in 2003–04 within a project on trend biomonitoring of macrozoobenthos in the Hron River system. They were focused on blackfly assemblages of the Hron River (Slovakia), using the distribution patterns of blackflies (18 species) from 14 sites, representing a fluent transition from epirithral to epipotamal. Two main “sister” groups were distinguished using TWINSPAN analysis. Prosimulium rufipes is an indicator species within the first group. This group typically occurs in the zone representing a part of the river upstream and its tributaries. Simulium lineatum is an indicator species within the second group that occurs in the zone representing the middle and lower part of the river. The Upstream–Downstream gradient represents, in fact, the ecological position (EP) of the studied localities of the Hron River along the River Continuum Concept. The distribution fitting analysis divides the distribution amplitude data of blackfly species into three sets of nonoverlaping intervals: (1) 0.00–0.19 stenotopic (P. rufipes in the upper course of the river, Simulium erythrocephalum in the lower course of the river), (2) 0.20–0.39 mesotopic (Simulium argyreatum, S. equinum—hyporhithral) and (3) 0.40–0.50 eurytopic (Simulium reptans, S. variegatum). According to CCA the most important variables correlated with the first axis, and were linked to the nitrate and maximal water temperature which gradually increase from the upper stretch of the river.

Keywords

Typology Running waters Simuliidae Carpathians Longitudinal gradient Slovakia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was a part of the Grant Projects 1/1291/04 and 1/1292/04 which were funded by the Slovak Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education and Science. We thank Prof. P.H. Adler from Clemson University, USA for correcting the English version of the manuscript and for giving very useful suggestions. We would like to express our thanks to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. Ambruš, B. & E. Bulánková, 2005. Vplyv hydromorfológie toku Hrona na populáciu rybárika riečneho Alcedo attis ispida (Coraciiformes: Alcedinidae). Acta Facultatis Ecologiae, 13: 53–59.Google Scholar
  2. Bitušík, P., M. Svitok & M. Dragúňová, 2006. The actual longitudinal zonation of the river Hron (Slovakia) based on chironomid assemblages (Diptera, Chironomidae) Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Biologica 50: 5–17.Google Scholar
  3. Begon, M., J. L. Harper & C. R. Townsend, 1990. Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Bulánková, E. & J. Halgoš, 1995. Príspevok, k poznaniu druhov vybraných čel’adí dvojkrídlovcov (Diptera) pohoria Vtáčnik. Rosalia (Nitra) 10: 145–150.Google Scholar
  5. Bulánková, E., I. Krno & J. Halgoš, 2000. Makrozoobentos ako indikátor odprírodnenia povodia Hrona v regióne Žiarskej kotliny. Správy Slovenskej zoologickej spoločnosti 18: 81–94.Google Scholar
  6. Feld, Ch.K., E. Kiel & M. Lautenschläger, 2002. The indication of morphological degradation of streams and rivers using Simuliidae. Limnologica 32: 273–288.Google Scholar
  7. Furse, M., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot, L. Sandin, K. Brabec, K. Gritzalis, A. Buffagni, P. Pinto, N. Friberg, J. Murray-Bligh, J. Kokeš, R. Alber, P. Usseglio-Polatera, P. Haase, R. Sweeting, B. Bis, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Soszka, G. Springe, F. Šporka & I. Krno, 2006. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glathaar, R., 1978. Verbreitung und Oekologie der Kriebelműcken (Diptera, Simuliidae) in der Schweiz. Separatdruck aus Vierteljahrschrift der Naturforschenden Geselschaft in Zűrich 123: 71–124.Google Scholar
  9. Halgoš, J., D. Illéšová & I. Krno, 2001. The effect of some ecological factors on longitudinal patterns of some blackfly community structure (Diptera, Simuliidae) in foothill stream. Biologia, Bratislava 56: 513–523.Google Scholar
  10. Hill, M.O., 1979. TWINSPAN – A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Illéšová, D., 2003. Slovak Aquatic Macroinvertebrates–Simuliidae. Pages 203–207, 546–554 in Slovak Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Checklist and Catalogue of Autecological Notes Šporka, F. (ed.), Slovenský hydrometeorologický ústav, Bratislava.Google Scholar
  12. Illéšová, D. & J. Halgoš, 1999. The structure of blackfly communities (Diptera, Simuliidae) in Pol’ana biospheric reserve. Dipterologica bohemoslovaca 9: 71–76.Google Scholar
  13. Illéšová, D. & J. Halgoš, 2004. Black flies (Diptera, Simuliidae) of the Turiec river. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae. Zoologia 46: 59–63.Google Scholar
  14. Illéšová, D. & J. Halgoš. 2006. Blackfly communities (Diptera, Simuliidae) of the Hron river (Slovakia). Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Biologica 50: 43–52.Google Scholar
  15. Illies, J. & L. Botosaneanu, 1963. Problèmes et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considerées surtout du point de vue faunistique. Mitteilungen des Internationalen Vereines fűr theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 12: 57p.Google Scholar
  16. Jedlička, L., 1976. Blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) spread in Middle Slovakia. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae. Zoologia 20: 97–127.Google Scholar
  17. Jedlička, L., 1984a. Simuliidae. Pages 74–83, 242–243 in Diptera Slovenska I. Čepelák, J. (ed.), Veda, Bratislava.Google Scholar
  18. Jedlička, L., 1984b. Simuliidengemeinschaften des Flusses Belá und seiner Nebenflűsse. Práce laboratória rybárstva a hydrobiológie 4: 193–211.Google Scholar
  19. Jedlička, L., M. Kúdela & V. Stloukalová, 2004. Key to the identification of blackfly pupae (Diptera: Simuliidae) of Central Europe. Biologia, Bratislava, 59(Suppl. 15): 157–178.Google Scholar
  20. Knoz, J., 1965. To identification of Czechoslovakian black-flies (Diptera, Simuliidae) Folia Facultatis Scienciarum Naturalium Universitatis Purkynianae Brunensis, 6: 1–54.Google Scholar
  21. Knoz, J., 1980. 2. čeled' Simuliidae—Muchničkovití [2. The Simuliidae family—black flies] pp. 144–281. In: Chvála, M. (ed.) Fauna ČSSR, Krevsající mouchy a střečci—Diptera [Bloodsucking and warble flies—Diptera] 22, Academia, Praha.Google Scholar
  22. Kokeš, J., S. Zahrádková, J. Hodovský & D. Nìmejcová, 2003. Predikèní systém PERLA. Acta Facultatis Ecologiae 10(Suppl. 1): 239–242.Google Scholar
  23. Krno, I., 2007. Impact of human activities on stonefly (Insecta, Plecoptera) ecological metrics in the Hron River (Slovakia). Biologia (Bratislava) 62: 446–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kúdela, M., 2004. Occurrence of Simulium aureum (Diptera:Simuliidae) in Slovakia. Entomofauna carpathica 16: 47–48.Google Scholar
  25. Lautenschläger, M. & E. Kiel, 2005. Assesing morphological degradation in running waters using Blackfly communities (Diptera, Simuliidae): Can habitat quality be predicted from land use? Limnologica 35: 262–273.Google Scholar
  26. Malmqvist, B., Y. Zhang & P.H. Adler, 1999. Diversity, distribution and larval habitats of North Swedish blackflies (Diptera, Simuliidae). Freshwater Biology 42: 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCreadie, J. & P. H. Adler, 2006. Ecoregions as predictors of lotic assembladges of blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Ecography 29: 603–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moog, O. (ed.), 1995. Fauna Aquatica Austriaca – Lieferung Mai/95. Waserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium fűr Land- und Fortwirtschaft, Wien.Google Scholar
  29. Offenböck, T., O. Moog & M. Car, 2002. Do the Austrian blyckfly fauna (Diptera: Simuliidae) support the typological approach of the EU water framework directive? Limnologica 32: 255–272.Google Scholar
  30. Sedlár, J., I. Stráňai & A. Makara 1983. Súčasný stav zarybnenia povodia Hrona. Pol’nohospodárstvo 29: 515–524.Google Scholar
  31. SHMÚ, 2005. Kvalita povrchových vôd na Slovensku, 2003–2004. Bratislava, Slovenský hydrometeorologický ústav, http://www.shmu.sk.
  32. Ter Braak, C.J.F. & P. Šmilauer, 1998. CANOCO reference Manual and User´s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power Ithaca, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  33. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummis, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130–137.Google Scholar
  34. Werner, D., 2003. The Simuliidae (Diptera) of the River Oder and its tributaries, with special reference to the re-appearance of Simulium (Schoenbaueria) nigrum in large rivers in Central Europe. Journal of Natural History 37: 1509–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright, J. F., D. Moss, P. D. Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running water sites in Great Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwater Biology 14: 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang Y., B. Malmqvist & G. Englung 1998. Ecological processes affecting community structure of blackfly larvae: a regional study. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 673–686.Google Scholar
  37. Zwick H., 1974. Faunistisch-ökologische und taxonomische Untersuchungen an Simuliidae (Diptera) unter besonderer Berűcksichtigung der Arten des Fulda-Gebietes. Abhandlungen der Deutschen. Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 533: 1–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Illéšová
    • 1
  • Jozef Halgoš
    • 2
  • Il’ja Krno
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of ZoologySlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural SciencesComenius UniversityBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations