Biomarkers: a strategic tool in the assessment of environmental quality of coastal waters
Ecosystems are under the pressure of complex mixtures of contaminants whose effects are not always simple to assess. Biomarkers, acting as early warning signals of the presence of potentially toxic xenobiotics, are useful tools for assessing either exposure to, or the effects of these compounds providing information about the toxicant bioavailability. In fact, it has been argued that a full understanding of ecotoxicological processes must consider an integrated multi-level approach, in which molecular impact is related with higher-order biological consequences at the individual, population and community levels. Monitoring programs should make use of this tool to link contaminants and ecological responses fulfilling strategies like those launched by OSPAR (Commissions of Oslo and Paris) Convention on the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic and the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). An overview of the work done in the past few years using biomarkers as in situ tools for pollution assessment in Portuguese coastal waters is presented as a contribution to the set up of a biomonitoring program for the Portuguese coastal zone. Considering the data set available the biomonitoring proposal should include the analysis of biomarkers and effects at individual levels. The aim of the program will include a spatial and temporal characterization of the biomarkers acetyl-cholinesterase, metallothioneins, DNA damage, adenylate energy charge and scope-for-growth levels. The investigation of the spatial variation of biomarkers is crucial to define sites for long term monitoring, which will be integrated with a chemical monitoring program. This framework will be a major contribution to the implementation of a national database for the use of biomarkers along the Portuguese coast.
KeywordsBiomarkers of exposure Biomarkers of defence Coastal waters Monitoring Environment quality
- Barroso, C. M., M. H. Moreira & M. J. Bebianno, 2002. Imposex, female sterility and organotins in the prosobranch Nassarius reticulatus (L.) from the Portuguese Coast. Marine Environmental Progress Series 230: 127–135.Google Scholar
- Bickham, J. W., 1990. Flow cytometry as a technique to monitor the effects of environmental genotoxins on wildlife populations. In Sandu, S. S. (ed.), In situ biological hazards of environmental pollutants. Plenum Press, New York, 94–108.Google Scholar
- Bryan, G. W., P. Gibbs, L. G. Hummerstone & G. R. Burt, 1986. The decline of the gastropod Nucella lapillus around the South-West England: evidence for the effect of tributyltin from antifouling paints. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 66: 611–640.Google Scholar
- Correia, A. D., M. H. Costa, K. P. Ryan & J. A. Nott, 2002a. Studies on biomarkers of copper exposure and toxicity in a marine amphipod Gammarus locusta (Crustacea): II. Copper-containing granules within the midgut gland. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 82: 827–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Del Valls, T. A., M. C. Casado-Martínez, I. Riba & J. Blasco, 2004. Linking sediment chemical and biological guidelines for characterization of dredged material. In Proccedings of the 3rd Workshop on Monitoring sediment quality at river basin scale. Understanding the behaviour and fate of pollutants. European Sediment Research Network, Apeldoorn, 101–105.Google Scholar
- Fernandes, S., V. Reis, F. O. Costa, M. H. Costa & P. Sobral, 2002. Scope-for-growth of Gammarus locusta and Hediste diversicolor as a tool to evaluate sediment quality in coastal systems. Part 1. Reference energy budgets. In Duarte, P. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on sustainable management of coastal Ecosystems. Ramsar, Gland.Google Scholar
- Handy, R. D., A. N. Jha & M. H. Depledge, 2002. Biomarker approaches for ecotoxicological biomonitoring at different levels of biological organisation. In Burden, F., I. McKelvie, U. Förstner & A. Guenther (eds), Handbook of Environmental Monitoring. McGraw Hill, New York, 9.1–9.32.Google Scholar
- ICES, 1997. ICES review of the status of biological effects techniques relative to their potential application programmes. ICES Cooperative Research Report 222: 12–20.Google Scholar
- ICES, 2001. The ICES Strategic Plan. ICES, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
- JAMP, 1998a. JAMP guidelines for general biological effects monitoring. Joint Assessment and Monitoring Programme. Oslo and Paris Commissions, Oslo.Google Scholar
- JAMP, 1998b. JAMP guidelines for contaminant-specific biological effects monitoring. Joint Assessment and Monitoring Programme. Oslo and Paris Commissions, Oslo.Google Scholar
- Lagadic, L., T. Caquet & J. C. Amiard, 1997. Intérêt d’une approche multiparamétrique pour le suivi de la qualité de l’environnement. In Lagadic, L., T. Caquet, J. C. Amiard & F. Ramade (eds), Biomarqueurs en écotoxicologie. Aspects Fondamentaux. Masson, Paris, 393–401.Google Scholar
- Langston, W. J., M. J. Bebianno & G. R. Burt, 1998. Metal handling strategies in molluscs. In Langston, J. & M. J. Bebianno (eds), Metal metabolism in the aquatic environment. Chapman and Hall, London, 219–272.Google Scholar
- Neuparth, T., 2004. Development of methodologies to assess genotoxicity in crustaceans and fish. PhD thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon.Google Scholar
- NMMP UK, 2004. The Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science. http://www.cefas.co.uk/monitoring.
- OSPAR, 2004. OSPAR Commission. http://www.ospar.org.
- Picado, A. M., 1997. La charge énergétique adénylique: utilisation pratique pour l’évaluation des effets sub-létaux des pollutions. PhD thesis, Ecole Pratique Hautes Etudes, Paris.Google Scholar
- Sobral, P. & J. Widdows, 2000. Effects of increasing current velocity, turbidity and particle size selection on the feeding activity and scope for growth of Ruditapes decussatus from Ria Formosa, Southern Portugal. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 245: 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Widdows, J. & P. Donkin, 1992. Mussels and environmental contaminants: bioaccumulation and environmental aspects. In Gosling, E. (ed.), The Mussel Mytilus: Ecology, Physiology, Genetics and Culture. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science. Elsevier, London, 383–424.Google Scholar