Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 583, Issue 1, pp 275–283 | Cite as

Priority effects of the early breeding fire salamander on the late breeding banded newt

  • Ori Segev
  • Leon Blaustein
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

Early breeding intraguild predators may have advantages over late breeding predators via priority effects; early breeding predators may reduce shared prey resources before late breeders appear and may also prey upon the late breeders. Here we show that predatory larvae of the late-breeding predatory banded newt, Triturus vittatus vittatus, occupy the same temporary pond toward the end of the developmental period of the early-breeding predatory fire salamander, Salamandra salamandra, resulting in a large size disparity between larvae of these two species while they co-occur. We conducted outdoor artificial pool experiments to assess priority effects of large larval Salamandra at the end of their larval development period, on recently hatched larval Triturus. We also assessed how artificial vegetation may influence larval Triturus performance in the presence or absence of Salamandra Salamandra, introduced into the experimental pools two weeks prior to the newt larvae, strongly reduced invertebrate prey abundance shared by these two predatory urodeles and with only a one week period of overlap, strongly reduced abundance of Triturus larvae. The artificial vegetation had only a small ameliorating effect on Triturus survival when Salamandra was present. Triturus size at metamorphosis (snout-tail length) was significantly larger in the Salamandra pools, presumably due to a combination of a strong “thinning effect” and greater vulnerability of smaller Triturus individuals to predation by Salamandra. Time to metamorphosis was not significantly affected by Salamandra. These results have conservation implications as T. v. vittatus is listed as highly endangered and may also explain the largely negative spatial association of the two species.

Keywords

Habitat heterogeneity Priority effects Salamandra salamandra Triturus vittatus vittatus Temporary pools Predation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Shai Anuka for technical help, Tamar Krugman and Eden Orion for logistical help, Moshe Kiflawi, Avi Eitam, Naomi Hill, Nir Peleg, Alon Silberbush, Oren Pearlson, Gad Degani and Shirli Bar-David and two anonymous reviewers for critiquing an earlier version of the manuscript. The research was funded by a Vataat doctoral fellowship awarded to O. Segev and U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation grants 98–390 and 02–365 awarded to L. Blaustein and M. Mangel.

References

  1. Abrams, P. A., O. Leimar, S. Nylin & C. Wiklund, 1996. The effect of flexible growth rates on optimal sizes and development times in a seasonal environment. American Naturalist 147: 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babbitt, K. J. & F. Jordan, 1996. Predation on Bufo terrestris tadpoles: Effects of cover and predator density. Copeia 2: 485–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babbitt, K. J., 2001. Behaviour and growth of southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala) tadpoles: Effects of food and predation risk. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79: 809–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baber, M. J. & K. J. Babbit, 2004. Influence of habitat complexity on predator-prey interactions between the fish (Gambusia holbrooki) and tadpoles of Hyla squirella and Gastrophryne carolinensis. Copeia 1: 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, H. K. & J. S. Richardson, 2002. Predation risk and competition effects on the life-history characteristics of larval Oregon spotted frog and larval red-legged frog. Oecologia 132: 436–444.Google Scholar
  6. Blaustein, L., 1997. Non-consumptive effects of larval Salamandra on crustacean prey: Can eggs detect predators? Oecologia 110: 212–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaustein, L., N. Engert, E. Steiner, E. Nevo & M. R. Warburg, 1996a. Israel’s endangered Urodele species: Preliminary studies on their distribution across Mount Carmel and their influence on community structure of temporary pools. In Steinberger, Y. (ed.), Preservations of Our World in the Wake of Change. Vol. 6A/B. ISEEQ publishing, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
  8. Blaustein, L., J. Friedman & T. Fahima, 1996b. Larval Salamandra drive temporary pool community dynamics: Evidence from an artificial pool experiment. Oikos 76: 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blaustein, L. & J. Margalit, 1996. Priority effects in temporary pools: Nature and outcome of mosquito larva toad tadpole interactions depend on order of entrance. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brodin, T. & F. Johansson, 2002. Effects of predator-induced thinning and activity changes on life history in a damselfly. Oecologia 132: 316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brodman, R., 1999. Food and space dependent effects during the interactions of two species of larval salamanders. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 14: 431–437.Google Scholar
  12. Degani, G. & D. Kaplan, 1999. Distribution of amphibian larvae in Israeli habitats with changeable water availability. Hydrobiologia 405: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eitam, A., L. Blaustein & M. Mangel, 2005. Density and intercohort priority effects on larval Salamandra salamandra in temporary pools. Oecologia 146: 36–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fauth, J. E., 1990. Interactive effects of predators and early larval dynamics of the treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis. Ecology 71: 1609–1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gafny, S., 2004. Threatened amphibians in Israel. In Dolev, A. & A. Perevolotsky (eds), The red book - vertebrates in Israel. Israel Nature and Parks Authority and The Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
  16. Gustafson, M. P., 1994. Size-specific interactions among larvae of the Plethoodontid salamanders Gyrinophilus-Prophyriticus and Eurycea-Cirrigera. Journal of Herpetology 28: 470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson, M. E. & R. D. Semlitsch, 1993. Pedomorphosis in the salamander Ambystoma talpoideum – effects of fish predator. Ecology 74: 342–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kats, L. B., J. A. Breeding, K. M. Hanson & P. Smith, 1994. Ontogenic changes in California newts (Tarich-Torosa) in response to chemical cues from conspecific predators. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13: 321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kupferberg, S. J., 1998. Predator mediated patch use by tadpoles (Hyla regilla): Risk balancing or consequences of motionless? Journal of Herpetology 32: 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morin, P. J., 1986. Interaction between intraspecific competition and predation in an amphibian predator-prey system. Ecology 67: 713–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morin, P. J., S. P. Lawler & E. A. Johnson, 1990. Ecology and breeding phenology of larval Hyla-andersonii-the disadvantages of breeding late. Ecology 71: 1590–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicieza, A. G., 2000. Interacting effects of predation risk and food availability on larval anuran behavior and development. Oecologia 123: 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peacor, S. D. & E. E. Werner, 2004. Context dependence of nonlethal effects of a predator on prey growth. Israel Journal of Zoology 50: 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Resetarits, W. J., 1995. Competitive asymmetry and coexistence in size-structured populations of Brook trout and spring salamanders. Oikos 73: 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rowe, L. & D. Ludwig, 1991. Size and timing of metamorphosis in complex life cycles: Time constraints and variation. Ecology 72: 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Semlitsch, R. D. & H. U. Reyer, 1992. Modification of anti predator behavior in tadpoles by environmental conditioning. Journal of Animal Ecology 61: 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sih, A., 1987. Prey refuges and predatory stability. Theoretical Population. Biology 31: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spencer, M. & L. Blaustein, 2001. Hatching responses of temporary pool invertebrates to signals of environmental quality. Israel Journal of Zoology 47: 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spencer M., S. S. Schwartz & L. Blaustein, 2002. Are there fine-scale spatial patterns in community similarity among temporary freshwater pools? Global Ecology and Biogeography 11: 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steiner, C. F. & A. H. Roy, 2003. Seasonal succession in fishless ponds: effects of enrichment and invertebrate predators on zooplankton community structure. Hydrobiologia 490: 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Turner, A. M. & S. L. Montgomery, 2003. Spatial and temporal scales of predator avoidance: Experiments with fish and snails. Ecology 84: 616–622.Google Scholar
  32. Van Buskirk, J. & K. L. Yurewicz, 1998. Effects of predators on prey growth rate: Relative contributions of thinning and reduced activity. Oikos 82: 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walls, S. C., 1995. Differential vulnerability to predation and refuge use in competing larval salamanders. Oecologia 101: 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walls, S. C. & M. G. Williams, 2001. The effect of community composition on persistence of prey with their predators in an assemblage of pond-breeding amphibians. Oecologia 128: 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Warburg, M. R., 1994. Population ecology, breeding activity, longevity, and reproductive strategies of Salamandra salamandra during an 18-year long study of an isolated population on Mt. Carmel, Israel. Mertensiella 4: 399–421.Google Scholar
  36. Werner, E. E., 1986. Amphibian metamorphosis: growth rate, predation risk, and the optimal size at transformation. American Naturalist 128: 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Werner, E. E., 1991. Nonlethal effects of a predator on competitive interactions between two anuran larvae. Ecology 72: 1709–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Community Ecology Laboratory, Institute of Evolution, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations