, Volume 565, Issue 1, pp 277–288 | Cite as

Advancing Science for Water Resources Management

  • G. E. Petts
  • J. Nestler
  • R. Kennedy
Opinion Paper


Despite the major advances in science to underpin water resources and river management that have taken place over the past two decades, a need remains to establish a unifying framework that will lead to new, appropriate tools for water resources management. In Europe, this need has been highlighted by the promotion of the Water Framework Directive. From a scientific perspective, key questions focus on the ecological significance of flow variability over a range of timescales and the linkage between flow variability, habitat variability and biological population responses, and the biological interactions among these populations. Creation of scientifically sound tools requires development of knowledge at the level of first principles to realize sustainable developments within the context of adaptive management. Similitude analyses provide a mechanism for upscaling from fine ‘research’ scales to the coarser scales of water resource managers. Lack of appropriate data is the major obstacle to the development of these tools, especially those concerned with large rivers.


flow variability integrated physical-biological models long-term datasets science-based management water resources 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amon, R. M. W., Budeus, G., Meon, B. 2003Dissolved organic carbon distribution and origin in the Nordic Seas: exchanges with the Arctic Ocean and the North AtlanticJournal of Geophysical Research108/27117Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, E., Nilsson, C., Johansson, M.E. 2000Effects of river fragmentation on plant dispersal and riparian floraRegulated Rivers: Research and Management168389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, A. 2001Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterisation of some sewage impacted riversEnvironmental Science and Technology35948953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, A. 2002Fluorescence properties of some farm wastes: implications for water quality monitoringWater Research36189194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boon, P. J., B. R. Davies & G. E. Petts, (eds), 2000. Global Perspectives on River Conservation. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. Cattanéo, F., Lamouroux, N., Breil, P., Capra, H. 2002The influence of hydrological and biotic processes on brown trout (Salmo trutta) population dynamicsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences591222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capra, H., Sabaton, C., Gournaud, V., Souchon, Y., Lim, P. 2003A population dynamics model and habitat simulation as a tool to predict brown trout demography in natural and bypassed stream reachesRiver Research and Applications19551568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cioffi, F., Gallerano, F. 2003A 2D self-adaptive hydrodynamic scheme for the assessment of the effects of structures on flooding phenomena in river basinsRiver Research and Applications19126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Church, M. 2002Geomorphic thresholds in riverine landscapesFreshwater Biology47541558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, M. J. 2002Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river managementAquatic Conservation12 347363Google Scholar
  11. Cosgrove, D. & G. E. Petts (eds), 1990. Water, Engineering and Landscape. Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Environment Agency2001Our Vision: Making It HappenEnvironment AgencyBristolGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer, H., Sukhodolov, A., Wilczek, S., Engelhardt, C. 2003Effects of flow dynamics and sediment movement on microbial activity in a lowland riverRiver Research and Applications19473482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geerling, G. W., Ragas, A. M. J., Leuven, R. S. E. W., Berg, J. H., Breedveld, M., Liefhebber, D., Smits, A. J. M. 2006Succession and rejuvenation in floodplains along the river Allier (France)Hydrobiologia5657186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodson, J. M., Gurnell, A. M., Angold, P. G., Morrissey, I. P. 2002Riparian seed banks along the lower River Dove, UK: their structure and ecological implicationsGeomorphology474560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gouraud, V., Baglinière, J. L., Baran, P., Sabaton, C., Lim, P., Ombredane, D. 2001Factors regulating brown trout populations in two French rivers: application of a dynamic population modelRegulated Rivers: Research and Management17557569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gurnell, A. M., Petts, G. E. 2002Island-dominated landscapes of large floodplain rivers, a European perspectiveFreshwater Biology47581600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Irvine, K. 2004Classifying ecological status under the European Water Framework Directive: the need for monitoring to account for natural variabilityAquatic Conservation14107112Google Scholar
  19. Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In Dodge D. P. (ed.), Proceedings International Large River Symposium. Canadian Special Publication Fisheries Aquatic Sciences 106: 110–127.Google Scholar
  20. Latterell, J. J., Fausch, K. D., Gowan, C., Riley, S. C. 1998Relationship of trout recruitment to snowmelt runoff flows and adult trout abundance in six Colorado Mountain streamsRivers6240250Google Scholar
  21. Leuven, R. S. E. W., Smits, A. J. M., Nienhuis, P. H. 2000From integrated approaches to sustainable river basin managementSmits, A. J. M.Nienhuis, P. H.Leuven, R. S. E. W. eds. New Approaches to River ManagementBackhuys PublishersLeiden329347Google Scholar
  22. Logan, P., Furse, M. 2002Preparing for the European Water Framework Directive – making the links between habitat and aquatic biotaAquatic Conservation12425437Google Scholar
  23. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J.P., Hector,  A., Hooper, D. U., Huston, M. A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid,  B., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A. 2001Ecology – biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challengesScience294804808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milner, A. M., Brittain, J. E., Petts, G. E. 2001Trends of macroinvertebrate community structure in glacier-fed rivers in relation to environmental conditions: a synthesisFreshwater Biology4618331848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naiman, R. J., Bunn, S. E., Nilsson, C., Petts, G. E., Pinay, G., Thompson,  L. 2002Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: an overviewEnvironmental Management30455467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nienhuis, P. H., Leuven, R. S. E. W. 2001River restoration and flood protection: controversy or synergismHydrobiologia4448599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pasternack, G. B., Wang, C. L., Merz, J. E. 2004Application of a 2D hydrodynamic model to design of reseach-scale spawning gravel replenishment on the Mokelumne River, CaliforniaRiver Research and Applications20205225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Petts, G. E. 1987Timescales for ecological change in regulated riversCraig, J.Kemper, J. B. eds. Regulated Streams: Advances in EcologyPlenumNew York257266Google Scholar
  29. Petts, G. E. 1996Water allocation to protect river ecosystemsRegulated Rivers: Research and Management12353367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petts, G. E. 2000A perspective on the abiotic processes sustaining the ecological integrity of running watersHydrobiologia422/4231527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petts, G. E., Bickerton, M. A., Crawford, C., Lerner, D. N., Evans, D. 1999Flow management to sustain groundwater-dominated stream ecosystemsHydrological Processes13497513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petts, G. E., Gurnell, A. M. 2005Dams and geomorphology: research progress and future directionsGeomorphology712747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Petts, J. I., S. Owens & H. Bulkeley, 2005. Summary of discussions and recommendations. ESRC Transdisciplinary Seminar Series: knowledge and power, exploring the science/society interface in the urban environment context. Scholar
  34. Poff, N. L., Ward, J. V. 1989Implication of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patternsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences4618051818Google Scholar
  35. Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Palmer, M. A., Hart, D. D., Richter, B. D., Arthington, A. H., Rogers, K. H., Meyer, J. L., Stanford, J. A. 2003River flows and water wars? Emerging science for environmental decision-makingFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment1298306Google Scholar
  36. Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B., Sparks, R., Stromberg, J. 1997The natural flow regime: a new paradigm for riverine conservation and restorationBioScience47769784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poff, N. L., Ward, J. V. 1990The physical habitat template of lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatio-temporal heterogeneityEnvironmental Management14629646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D. 1995Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrologic variabilityEcology76606627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Postel, S., Carpenter, S. 1997Freshwater ecosystem servicesDaily, G. C. eds. Nature’s ServicesIsland PressWashington DC195214Google Scholar
  40. Railsback, S. F. & B. C. Harvey, 2003. An Individual-based Trout Model for Instream Flow Assessment: Validity, Advantages, and Disadvantages International IFIM Users’ Workshop. Fort Collins: Colorado USA.Google Scholar
  41. Resh, V. H., Brown, A. V., Covich, A. P., Gurtz, M. E., Li, H. W., Minshall, G. W., Reice, S. R., Sheldon, A. L., Wallace, J. B., Wissmar, R. C. 1988The role of disturbance in stream ecologyJournal of North American Benthological Society7433455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards, K., Brasington, J., Hughes, F. 2002Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: ecological implications and a potential modelling strategyFreshwater Biology47559580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J., Braun, P. D. 1996A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystemsConservation Biology1011631174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Wingington, R., Braun, P. D. 1997How much water does a river need?Freshwater Biology37231249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sadler, J. P., Bell, D., Fowles, A. P. 2004The hydroecological controls and conservation value of beetles on exposed riverine sediments in England and WalesBiological Conservation1184156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sauvage, S., Teissier, S., Vervier, P., Ameziane, T., Garabetian, F., Delmas, F., Caussade, B. 2003A numerical tool to integrate biophysical diversity of a large regulated river: hydrobiogeochemical bases. The case of the Garonne River (France)River Research and Applications19181198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sinsaburgh, R. L. & S. E. G. Findley, 2003. Dissolved organic matter: out of the black box and into the mainstream. In: Findlay, S. E. G. & R. L. Sinsabaugh (eds), Aquatic Ecosystems: Interactivity of DOM, Academic Press: 479–488.Google Scholar
  48. Smits, A. J. M., Nienhuis, P. H., Saeijs, H. L. F. 2006Changing estuaries, changing viewsHydrobiologia565339355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stanford, J. A., Ward, J. V., Liss, W. J., Frissell, C. A., Williams, R. N., Lichatowich, J. A., Coutant, C. C. 1996A general protocol for restoration of regulated riversRegulated Rivers: Research and Management12391413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tabacchi, E., Correll, D. L., Hauer, R., Pinay, G., Planty-Tabacchi, A. -M., Wissmar, R. C. 1998Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscapeFreshwater Biology40497516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tockner, K., Malard, F., Ward, J. V. 2000An extension of the flood pulse conceptHydrological Processes1428612883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Townsend, C. R. 1989The patch dynamic concept of stream community ecologyJournal North American Benthological Society83650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stokkom, H. T. C., Smits, A. J. M., Leuven, R. S. E. W. 2005Flood defense in the Netherlands: a new era, a new approachWater International30/17687Google Scholar
  54. Vannotte, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., Cushing, C. E. 1980The river continuum conceptCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences37130137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vugteveen, P., Leuven, R. S. E. W., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Lenders, H. J. R. 2006Redefinition and elaboration of river ecosystem health: perspective for river managementHydrobiologia565289308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walters, C. 1986Adaptive Management of Renewable ResourcesBlackburn PressNew JerseyGoogle Scholar
  57. Ward, J. V., Tockner, K., Uehlinger, U., Malard, F. 2001Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restorationRegulated Rivers: Research and Management17311323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whittaker, D., Shelby, B. 2000Managed flow regimes and resources values: traditional versus alternative strategiesRivers7233244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of BirminghamEdgbastonUK
  2. 2.US Army Engineer Research and Development CentreVicksburgUSA
  3. 3.US Army Engineer Research and Development CentreEuropean Research OfficeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations