Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 561, Issue 1, pp 239–249 | Cite as

Ecology and Assessment of the Benthic Diatom Communities of Four Lake Erie Estuaries using Lange-Bertalot Tolerance Values

  • Gerald V. Sgro
  • Michael E. Ketterer
  • Jeffrey R. JohansenEmail author
Article

Abstract

Diatom composition of four Lake Erie estuaries was related to seasonal factors, year, location within the estuaries, and water quality parameters including nutrient and metals concentrations. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) revealed seasonality as the most important factor determining variability in diatom species composition among sites and dates. Alkalinity, pH, silicate, orthophosphate, and nitrite concentrations were water chemistry parameters correlated with diatom community composition. Eigenvalues for the first two CCA axes of nutrient/physical data and species data were higher than the first two CCA axes of metals data and species data. In addition, the water quality of these estuaries was evaluated using an index composed of Lange-Bertalot pollution tolerance values. The Lange-Bertalot index scores indicated that the Ashtabula estuary had the best water quality of the study sites. Lange-Bertalot index scores were highly correlated with a gradient of disturbance represented by the first axis of a principle components analysis of sites and nutrient data (Spearman ρ = 0.7). The Lange-Bertalot tolerance values could be useful for discriminating ‘good’ sites from “bad” sites among the Lake Erie estuaries.

Keywords

biomonitoring diatoms estuary Lake Erie Lange-Bertalot Index water quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Public Health Administration (APHA)1989Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater17American Public Health AdministrationWashington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahls, L. L., R. Bukantis & S. Tralles, 1992. Benchmark Biology of Montana Reference Streams. Water Quality Bureau Helena, Montana, 107 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Beaver, J., 1981. Apparent Ecological Characteristics of Some Common Freshwater Diatoms. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, 517 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Brant, R. A., Herdendorf, C. E. 1972Delineation of Great Lakes estuariesProceedings 15th Conference Great Lakes Research, International Association Great Lakes Research15710718Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, D. B., 1983. Transport and deposition of sediment in Old Woman Creek Estuary of Lake Erie. Ohio State Univ., Ohio Sea Grant Tech. Bull. 10, 198 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Charles, D. F., Smol, J. P. 1988New methods for using diatoms and chrysophytes to infer past pH of low-alkalinity lakesLimnology Oceanography3314511462Google Scholar
  7. Davis, C. C. 1964Evidence for the eutrophication of Lake Erie from phytoplankton recordsLimnology Oceanography9275283Google Scholar
  8. Dixit, S. S., Cumming, B. F., Birks, H. J. B., Smol, J. P., Kingston, J. C., Uutala, A. J., Charles, D. F., Camburn, K. E. 1993Diatom assemblages from Adirondack lakes (New York, USA) and the development of inference models for retrospective environmental assessmentJournal of Paleolimnology82747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dixit, C. C., Smol, J. P. 1994Diatoms as indicators in the environmental monitoring and assessment program-surface waters (EMAP-SW)Environmental Monitoring and Assessment31275306Google Scholar
  10. Harrel, R. C., Dorris, T. C. 1968Stream order, morphometry, physico-chemical conditions, and community structure of benthic macro invertebrates in an intermittent stream systemAmerican Naturalist80221251Google Scholar
  11. Herdendorf, C. E., 1989. Paleogeology and geomorphology. In Lake Erie Estuarine Systems: Issues, Resources, Status and Management. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Estuary-of-the-Month Seminar Series No.14, 35–70.Google Scholar
  12. Hynes, H. B. N. 1960The Biology of Polluted Waters Liverpool University PressLiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, L. B., Richards, C., Host, G. E., Arthur, J. W. 1997Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystemsFreshwater Biology37193208Google Scholar
  14. Jongman, R. H. G., C. J. F. ter Braak & O. F. R. van Tongeren, 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen, the Netherlands 299 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Juggins, S., ter Braak, C. J. F. 1992CALIBRATE – a Program for Species-Environment Calibration by [Weighted Averaging] Partial Least Squares RegressionEnvironmental Change Research Center, University CollegeLondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Klarer, D. M., 1988. The role of a freshwater estuary in mitigating storm water inflow. OWC Technical Report No. 5, Ohio Dept. Nat. Res., Div. Nat. Areas and Preserves.Google Scholar
  17. Klarer, D. M., Hickman, M. 1975The effect of thermal effluent upon the standing crop of an epiphytic algal communityHydrobiology601762Google Scholar
  18. Klein, R., 1979. Urbanization and stream quality impairment. American Water Resources Assoc. Water Resources Bulletin 15(4).Google Scholar
  19. Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection1993Methods for Investigating Biological Integrity of Surface WatersKentucky Department for Environmental ProtectionFrankfort, Kentucky140Google Scholar
  20. Lange-Bertalot, H. 1979Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimationNova Hedwigia, Beih.64285304Google Scholar
  21. Lowe, R. L., 1974. Environmental Requirements and Pollution Tolerance of Freshwater Diatoms. Environmental Monitoring Series: EPA-670/4–74–005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  22. Makarewitcz, J.C., 1985. Phytoplankton and Zooplankton Composition, Abundance and Distribution: Lake Erie, Lake Huron and Lake Michigan – 1983. EPA-905/2–87–002 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois, 44 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Manugistics Corporation1992Statgraphics Plus Statistical SoftwareRockvilleMDGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohio Department of Natural Resources1997Combined Coastal Management Program and Final Environmental Impact Statement for the State of OhioVol I Office of Real Estate and Land ManagementColumbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  25. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency1987Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Vol II: The Role of Biological Data in Water Quality AssessmentEcological Assessment Section, Division of Water Quality Planning and AssessmentColumbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency1991Ashtabula River Remedial Action PlanDivision of Water Quality Planning and AssessmentColumbus, Ohio171Google Scholar
  27. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency1994Biological and Water Quality Study of the Cuyahoga River and Selected TributariesEcological Assessment Section, Division of Surface WaterColumbus, Ohio128Google Scholar
  28. Omernik, J. M. 1976The Influence of Land Use on Stream Nutrient LevelsU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyWashington, D.CEPA-600/3–76–014Google Scholar
  29. Osborne, L. L., Wiley, M. J. 1988Empirical relationships between land use/cover patterns and stream water quality in an agricultural catchmentJournal of Environmental Management26927Google Scholar
  30. Pan, Y., Stevenson, R. J., Hill, B., Kaufmann, P. R., Herlihy, A. T. 1999Spatial patterns and ecological determinants of benthic algal assemblages in Mid-Atlantic Highland streamsJournal of Phycology35460468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Porter, S. D., Cuffney, T. F., Gurtz, M. E., Meader, M. R. 1993Methods for Collecting Algal Samples as Part of the National Water-Quality Assessment ProgramU.S. Geological Survey, Earth Science Information CenterDenver, CO39Google Scholar
  32. Potapova, M. G., Charles, D. F., Ponader, K. C., Winter, D. M. 2004Quantifying species indicator values for trophic diatom indices: a comparison of approachesHydrobiology5172541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schuler, T. R. & J. Galli, 1992. Environmental impacts of storm water ponds. In Watershed restoration sourcebook, Anacostia Restoration Team. Metropolitan Council of Governments. Washington D.C. 242 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Sgro, G. V., Johansen, J. R.,  et al. 1995Rapid bioassessment of algal periphyton in freshwater streamsButterworth, F. M. eds. Biomonitors and Biomarkers as Indicators of Environmental ChangePlenum PressNew York291311Google Scholar
  35. Sgro, G. V., Johansen, J. R. 1998Ecology and Assessment of the Algal Communities of Four Lake Erie EstuariesCleveland State UniversityCleveland, OhioPh.D. dissertationGoogle Scholar
  36. Squires, L. E., Rushforth, S. R., Brotherson, D. J. 1979Algal response to a thermal effluent: Study of a power station on the Provo River, Utah, USAHydrobiology6310111017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stevenson, R. J., Stoermer, E. F. 1982Abundance patterns of diatoms on Cladophora in Lake Huron with respect to point source of wastewater treatment plant effluentJournal of Great Lakes Research8184195Google Scholar
  38. Stevenson, R. J. & R. L. Lowe, 1986. Sampling and interpretation of algal patterns for water quality assessments. In: Isom B. G. (ed.), Rationale for Sampling and Interpretation of Ecological Data in the Assessment of Freshwater Ecosystems, ASTM STP American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 894:118–149.Google Scholar
  39. Stoermer, E. F., Wolin, J. A., Schelski, C. L., Conley, J. D. 1985An assessment of the ecological changes during the recent history of Lake Ontario on siliceous algal microfossils␣preserved in sedimentsJournal of Phycology21257276Google Scholar
  40. ter Braak, C. J. F., 1987. CANOCO a FORTRAN Program for Canonical Community Ordination by [Partial] [Detrended] [Canonical] Correspondence Analysis, Principal Components Analysis, and Redundancy Analysis (version 2.1). Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 95 pp.Google Scholar
  41. ter Braak, C.J.F., 1990. Update Notes: CANOCO version 3.10. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 95 pp.Google Scholar
  42. ter Braak, C. J. F., Dam,  1989Inferring pH from diatoms: A comparison of old and new calibration methodsHydrobiology178209223Google Scholar
  43. Thoma, R. F., 1998. Biological monitoring and an index of biotic integrity for Lake Erie’s near shore waters. In Simon, T.P. (ed.) Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, 417461.Google Scholar
  44. Trebitz, A. S., Morrice, J. A., Cotter, A. M. 2002Relative role of lake and tributary in hydrology of Lake Superior coastal wetlandsJournal of Great Lakes Research28212227Google Scholar
  45. Dam, H., Mertenes, A., Sinkeldam, J. 1994A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the NetherlandsNetherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology28117133Google Scholar
  46. Vinson, D. K., Rushforth, S. R. 1989Diatom species composition along a thermal gradient in the Portneuf River, Idaho, USAHydrobiology1854154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zaborojny, C., Saxon, S., Finger, R. 1973Spectrophotometric determination of ammoniaJournal of the Water Pollution Control Federation45905912Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald V. Sgro
    • 1
  • Michael E. Ketterer
    • 2
  • Jeffrey R. Johansen
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.John Carroll University, University HeightsUSA
  2. 2.Northern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations