, Volume 539, Issue 1, pp 93–98 | Cite as

Processing of leaf matter by lake-dwelling shredders at low oxygen concentrations

Primary Research Paper


Organic sediments in freshwaters are regularly subject to low concentrations of oxygen. The ability of detritivores to sustain their feeding in such conditions should therefore be of importance for the decomposition process. In the present study, aquaria were used to determine processing rates of five lake-dwelling shredders at three different oxygen concentrations; normoxic (9 mg O2 l−1) and two levels of hypoxia (1 and 2 mg O2 l−1). Discs of alder leaves (Alnus glutinosa (L.)) were used as food. Four species of caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera Limnephilidae) and the isopod, Asellus aquaticus (L.) were compared in the experiments. Significant differences in processing rates per g animal biomass were found both at normoxia and 2 mg oxygen l−1. At l mg O2 l−1 none of the invertebrates fed on leaf discs. The caddisfly larvae Halesus radiatus (Curtis), being one of the two most efficient shredders at normoxia, did not feed at 2 mg oxygen l−1. The other species fed at rates 15–50 of that at normoxia. The least efficient shredder at normoxia, A. aquaticus was similar to two of the trichopterans at 2 mg O2 l−1. This study shows that the importance of specific shredder species may shift in case of hypoxia. Species-specific traits regarding oxygen sensitivity may also be influential for distribution patterns of shredder species both within and between lakes.


shredders decomposition hypoxia littoral Limnephilidae Asellus aquaticus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersson, E. 1969Life-cycle and growth of Asellus aquaticus (L.)Report Institute of Freshwater Research, Drottningholm, Sweden49526Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, G. 1985Decomposition of alder leaves in acid watersEcological Bulletins37293299Google Scholar
  3. Blondel, J. 2003Guilds and functional groups: does it matter?Oikos100223231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohman, I. M., 2001. Shredders in lake Välen littoral zones – Species, abundance and coupling to leaf litter turn-over. In Licentiate Thesis: Utilization of Leaf Detritus in Oligotrophic Lake Littoral Zones. University of Kalmar, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahm, C. N, Trotter, E. H., Sedell, JR. 1987Role of anaerobic zones and processes in stream ecosystem productivityAverett, R. C.McKnight, D. M. eds. Chemical Quality of Water and the Hydrological CycleLewis PublishersChelsea, Michigan157178Google Scholar
  6. Friberg, N., Jacobsen, D. 1994Feeding plasticity of two detritivore-shreddersFreshwater Biology32133142Google Scholar
  7. Graça, M.A.S., Cressa, C., Gessner, MO., Feio, MJ., Callies, K.A., Barrios, C. 2001Food quality, feeding preferences, survival and growth of shredders from temperate and tropical streamsFreshwater Biology46947957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hargrave, B.T. 1972Aerobic decomposition of sediment and detritus as a function of particle surface area and organic contentLimnology and Oceanography.17583596Google Scholar
  9. Henrikson L. (1996). Acidification and liming of freshwater ecosystems. In PhD Thesis: Examples of Biotic Responses and Mechanisms. Göteborg University, Göteborg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  10. IversenT.M. Thorup, J. 1988A three years’ study of life cycle, population dynamics and production of Asellus aquaticus L. in a macrophyte rich streamInternationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie737394Google Scholar
  11. Jørgensen, B.B., Revsbech, NP. 1985Diffusive boundary layers and the oxygen uptake of sediments and detritusLimnology and Oceanography30111122Google Scholar
  12. Kemp, M.J., Dodds, WK. 2001Centimeter-scale patterns in dissolved oxygen and nitrification rates in a prairie streamJournal of the North American Benthological Society20347357Google Scholar
  13. Kok, C.J., Velde, G. 1994Decomposition and macroinvertebrate colonization of aquatic and terrestrial leaf material in alkaline and acid still waterFreshwater Biology316575Google Scholar
  14. Kolar, C.S., Rahel, FJ. 1993Interaction of a biotic factor (predator presence) and an abiotic factor (low oxygen) as an influence on benthic invertebrate communitiesOecologia95210219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lepneva, S. G., 1971. Larvae and pupae of integripalpia. fauna of the USSR, Trichoptera, Vol II, Nr. 2 Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 700 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Malicky, H. 1990Feeding tests with caddis larvae (Insecta: Trichoptera) and amphipods (Crustacea: Amphipoda) on Platanus orientalis (Platanaceae) and other leaf litterHydrobiologia206163173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maltby, L., Naylor, C., Calow, P. 1990Effect of stress on a freshwater benthic detritivore: scope for growth in Gammarus pulexEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety19285291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maltby, L. 1995Sensitivity of the crustaceans Gammarus pulex (L.) and Asellus aquaticus(L.) to short-term exposure to hypoxia and unionized ammonia: observations and possible mechanismsWater Research29781787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merritt, R. W., K. W. Cummins Burton TM., 1984. In Resh, V. H. D. M. Rosenberg (eds), The Ecology of Aquatic Insects. Praeger Publisher, New York: 134–163Google Scholar
  20. Nagell, B., Larshammar, P. 1981Critical oxygen demands in Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera nymphs as determined by two methodsOikos367582Google Scholar
  21. Nilsson, H.C., Sköld, M. 1996Arm regeneration and spawning in the brittle star Amphiura filiformis (O F. Müller) during hypoxiaJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology199193206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Otto, C. 1976Habitat relationships in the larvae of three Trichoptera speciesArchiv für Hydrobiologie77505517Google Scholar
  23. Otto, C. 1982Habitat, size and distribution of Scandinavian limnephilid caddisfliesOikos38355360Google Scholar
  24. Pamatmat, M.M. 1971Oxygen consumption by the seabed. 4. Shipboard and laboratory experimentsLimnology and Oceanography16536550Google Scholar
  25. Philipson G.N. (1954). The effect of water flow and oxygen concentration on six species of caddis fly (Trichoptera) larvae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London: 547–564Google Scholar
  26. Schulz, R., Liess, M. 1995Chronic effects of low insecticide concentrations on freshwater caddisfly larvaeHydrobiologia299103113Google Scholar
  27. Simberloff, D., Dayan, T. 1991The guild concept and the structure of ecological communitiesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics22115143Google Scholar
  28. S.I.S. (The standardizing committee of Sweden). (1975). Titimetrisk bestämning av halten löst oxygen hos vatten. Swedish Standard 028114: 1–6Google Scholar
  29. Slack, H.D. 1932The food of caddis fly (Trichoptera) larvaeJournal of Animal Ecology5105115Google Scholar
  30. Wallace, I. D., B. Wallace and Philipson GN., 2003. A key to the case-bearing caddis larvae of Britain and Ireland. Freshwater Biological Association, Scientific Publication No. 61 Ambleside: 131–227Google Scholar
  31. Wetzel, R.G. 2001Limnology Lake and River EcosystemsAcademic PressSan Diego160164Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Freshwater Ecology Group, Dept. of Biology and Environmental ScienceUniversity of KalmarKalmarSweden

Personalised recommendations