Advertisement

Power Technology and Engineering

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 215–220 | Cite as

Incidents at nuclear power plants caused by the human factor

  • V. A. Mashin
Thermal Power Stations
  • 119 Downloads

Psychological analysis of the causes of incorrect actions by personnel is discussed as presented in the report “Methodological guidelines for analyzing the causes of incidents in the operation of nuclear power plants.” The types of incorrect actions and classification of the root causes of errors by personnel are analyzed. Recommendations are made for improvements in the psychological analysis of causes of incorrect actions by personnel.

Keywords

nuclear power plant personnel incidents human factor types of error psychological analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Reason, “Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice,” Work and Stress, 12(3) (1998).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Methodological Guidelines for Analyzing the Causes of Incidents in the Operation of Nuclear Power Plants, Fires, Accidents and Damage to Buildings and Equipment. Appendix Zh, A Method forPsychological Analysis of the Causes of Incorrect Actions by Personnel,” at: http://www.tehlit.ru/1lib/normadoc/47/47805/
  3. 3.
    J. Reason, Human Error, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ICAO. Manual of Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation. Part III. Investigation, Doc 9756-AN_965 (2000).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. A. Shappell and D. A. Wiegmann, The human factors analysis and classification system — HFACS, DOT/FAA/AM-00/7, Office of Aviation Medicine, Washington, DC, USA (2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. C. Handy, A Tool for Human Factors Accident Investigation, Classification, and Risk Management, Technical Report TR 2002-057, DRDC, Toronto (2003).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. A. Mashin, A Method for Study of the Human Factor in Incidents and Accidents [in Russian], mashinva.narod.ru/arch/PSY17.pdf).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. I. Shatalova, English-Russian Thematic Dictionary, Astrel’ – AST, Moscow (2005).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    IAEA. Competency Assessments for Nuclear Industry Personnel, Vienna (2006).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    US DOE, Human Performance Improvement Handbook, Vol. 1: Concepts and Principles, DOE Standard DOE-HDBK-1028-2009, USDOE, Washington, DC (2009).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Reason, “The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B. Biol. Sci., 327 (1990).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IAEA. Organizational Factors Influencing Human Performance in Nuclear Power Plant, TECDOC-943, Vienna (1995).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Kern, Darker Shades of Blue: the Rogue Pilot, McGraw-Hill, New York (1999).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Hudson, M. V. Dockwise, and R. Briden, Meeting Expectations: A New Model for a Just and Fair Culture, Soc. of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), (2008).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Reason, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Ashgate, Brookfield, VT (1997).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A Roadmap to a Just Culture: Enhancing the Safety Environment, GAIN Working Group E, Flight Ops/ATC Ops. Safety Information Sharing (2004).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. A. Mashin, “Psychic load, psychic stress, and the functional state of control system operators,” Vopr. Psikhol., No. 6 (2007).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. A. Mashin, “Classification of human functional states,” Éksp. Psikhol., 4(1) (2011).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. Edwards, “Introductory overview,” in: E. L. Weiner and D. C. Nagel (eds.), Human Factors in Aviation, Acad. Press, San Diego, CA, USA (1988).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. N. Ushakov (ed.), Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language [in Russian], Astrel’ – AST, Moscow (2000).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    “Analysis of some incidents in 2001 at Russian nuclear power plants,” in: Proc. of the Third Int. Sci.-Tech. Conf. (MNTK-2002) on Safety, Economy, and Efficiency of Nuclear Power [in Russian], Moscow (2002) (reamntk.ru/dokladi4.htm).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    IAEA. The Role of Automation and Humans in Nuclear Power Plants, TECDOC-668, Vienna (1992).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    OECD. Identification and Assessment of Organisational Factors Related to the Safety of NPPs, SOAR, NEA/CSNI/R(99)21, Vol. 1 (1999).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    IAEA. Managing Human Resources in the Field of Nuclear Energy, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, No. NG-G-2.1.2009.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. Okrent and Y. Xiong, “Safety culture evaluation and ASSET root cause analysis,” in: Int. Topical Meeting on Safety Culture in Nuclear Installations, Vienna, April 24 – 28, 1995.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    US DOE. Human Performance Improvement and Occurrence Reporting, US DOE, ORPS, Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG) (www.hss.doe.gov/sesa/analysis/orps/taskgroup/hpibriefing.pdf).

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Mashin
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Institute of Continuing Education and Training (NOU DPO CIPK)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations