Human Studies

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 509–532 | Cite as

Trust and Confidence: History, Theory and Socio-Political Implications

  • Christian Morgner
Theoretical / Philosophical Paper


Even before trust became a buzzword, theoretical developments were made, which have instigated the development of two forms of trust which are described as personal trust and system trust/confidence. However, this distinction remained rather secondary in the overall literature. There is an overall lack on the historical developments of these forms of trust, their internal logic and how they interlink, overlap, or work against each other. The paper aims to advance these three aspects: first through a historical overview of the semantic of this distinction, followed by a theoretical reconstruction of the historical material and third by demonstrating how these theoretical concepts can be applied to political crises (Revolutions of 1989), thus revealing their logic and mutual interlocking.


Political sociology Trust History Political crises System trust Social theory 



For helpful comments on previous versions of this article, I would like to thank Christel Lane, Göran Therborn, Frens Kroeger, Claus Offe, Martin Endreß, and two anonymous reviewers. All mistakes and omissions are of course my own.


  1. Alexander, J. C. (1984). Three models of culture and society relations: Towards an analysis of Watergate. Sociological Theory, 3, 290–314.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. C. (1988). Culture and political crisis: “Watergate” and Durkheimian sociology. In J. C. Alexander (Ed.), Durkheimian sociology: Cultural studies (pp. 187–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. C. (1995). Watergate. In S. M. Lipset (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of democracy (Vol. 1, pp. 1367–1369). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, B. L., & Kay, F. M. (1995). Social capital, violations of trust and the vulnerability of isolates: The social organization of law practice and professional self-regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 23(4), 321–346.Google Scholar
  5. Arnott, D. C. (2007). Research on trust: A bibliography and brief bibliometric analysis of the special issue submissions. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 1203–1240.Google Scholar
  6. Ashby, R. W. (1968). Principles of the self-organizing system. In W. Buckley (Ed.), Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist: A sourcebook (pp. 108–128). Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Bacharach, M., & Gambetta, D. (2001). Trust in signs. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 148–184). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Bachmann, R., & Lane, C. (Eds.). (1998). Trust within and between organizations. Conceptual issues and empirical applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. K. S. (Eds.). (2006). The handbook of trust research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. K. S. (Eds.). (2008). Landmarks papers on trust (Vol. 2). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Basse, M. (1993). Certitudo spei. Thomas von Aquins Begründung der Hoffnungsgewißheit und ihre Rezeption bis zum Konzil von Trient als ein Beitrag zur Verhältnisbestimmung von Eschatologie und Rechtfertigungslehre. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  12. Berger, A. (1953). Encyclopaedic dictionary of Roman law. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society New Series, 43(2), 333–808.Google Scholar
  13. Borowik, I. (2002). The Roman Catholic Church in the process of democratic transformation: The case of Poland. Social Compass, 49(2), 239–252.Google Scholar
  14. Bradford, K. D., Michael Crant, J., & Phillips, J. M. (2009). How suppliers affect trust with their customers: The role of salesperson job satisfaction and perceived customer importance. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17, 383–394.Google Scholar
  15. Burgess, J. P. (1997). The East German church and the end of communism. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Callies, H. (1989). Zum römischen Klientelsystem, zumal in den politischen Auseinandersetzungen der späten Republik. In H. H. Nolte (Ed.), Patronage und Klientel: Ergebnisse einer polnisch-deutschen Konferenz (pp. 26–34). Köln, Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
  17. Chua, R. Y. J., Ingram, P., & Morris, M. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 436–452.Google Scholar
  18. Citrin, J., & Green, D. P. (1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 431–453.Google Scholar
  19. Cordell, K. (1990). The role of the evangelical church in the GDR. Government and Opposition, 25(1), 48–59.Google Scholar
  20. Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. de Vries, P., Midden, C., & Bouwhuis, D. (2003). The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 719–735.Google Scholar
  22. Desportes, Y. (2006). Trust, confidence and reliance: Reflections of a linguist. Global Economy Journal, 6(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  23. Dunn, J. (1984). The concept of ‘trust’ in the politics of John Locke. In R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, & Q. Skinner (Eds.), Philosophy in history. Essays on the historiography of philosophy (pp. 279–301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Earle, T. C. (2009). Trust, confidence, and the 2008 global financial crisis. Risk Analysis, 29, 785–792.Google Scholar
  25. Ebert, T. A. E. (2007). Interdisciplinary trust meta-analysis: Analysis of high rank trust articles between 1966 and 2006, discussion paper 2007–18. Munich: LMU: Munich School of Management.Google Scholar
  26. Endreß, M. (2010). Vertrauenskrisen und Vertrauensverluste, Widerspruch. Münchner Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 51, 27–40.Google Scholar
  27. Engels, L. J. (1964). Fiducia dans la vulgate le problème de traduction Parrhesia-fiducia. Graecitas et latinitas christianorum primaera, Supplementa I, 99–141.Google Scholar
  28. Engels, L. J. (1969). Fiducia. In T. Klauser, et al. (Eds.), Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum. Sachwörterbuch zur Auseinandersetzung des Christentums mit der Antiken Welt (Vol. VII, pp. 839–877). Stuttgart: Hiersemann, Anton.Google Scholar
  29. Fehir, F., & Arato, A. (Eds.). (1991). Crisis and reform in Eastern Europe. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Flores, F., & Solomon, R. C. (1998). Creating trust. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(2), 205–232.Google Scholar
  31. Fraenkel, E. (1916). Zur Geschichte des Wortes fides. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 71, 187–199.Google Scholar
  32. Francis, C. B. (1989). The progress of protest in China: The spring of 1989. Asian Survey, 29(9), 898–915.Google Scholar
  33. Freyburger, G. (1986). Fides. Étude sémantique et religieuse depuis les origines jusqu’à l’époque augustéenne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  34. Fuchs, P. (1997). Adressabilität als Grundbegriff der soziologischen Systemtheorie. Soziale Systeme, 1(3), 57–79.Google Scholar
  35. Gambetta, D. (1988a). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–237). New York, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Gambetta, D. (1988b). Foreword. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. New York, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Gauthier, R. A. (1951). Magnanimité: L’idéal de la grandeur dans la philosophie païenne et dans la théologie chrétienne, (Bibliothèque thomiste 28). Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  38. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Göppert, H. (1892). ‘Zur fiducia cum amico contracta,’ Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung, 13, 317–356.Google Scholar
  40. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar
  41. Greenidge, A. H. J. (1977). Infamia: Its place in Roman public and private law. Darmstadt: Scientia Verlag Aalen.Google Scholar
  42. Gruen, E. S. (1982). Greek pistis and Roman fides. Athenaeum: studi periodici di letteratura e storia dell’antichità, 60, 50–68.Google Scholar
  43. Gu, E. X. (1998). ‘Non-establishment’ intellectuals, public space, and the creation of non-governmental organizations in China: The Chen Ziming-Wang Juntao Saga. The China Journal, 39, 39–58.Google Scholar
  44. Guiot, J. M. (1977). Attribution and identity construction: Some comments. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 692–704.Google Scholar
  45. Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. Heck, P. (1889). Die fiducia cum amico contracta, ein Pfandgeschäft mit Salman. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung, 10, 82–138.Google Scholar
  47. Heinze, R. (1972). Fides. In R. Heinze (Ed.), (published by Erich Burck) Vom Geist des Römertums. Ausgewählte Aufsätze (pp. 59–81), 4th Edn. Darmstadt: Teubner.Google Scholar
  48. Hirschman, A. O. (1993). Exit, voice, and the fate of german democratic republic. World Politics, 45(1), 173–202.Google Scholar
  49. Hobbes, T. (1994). The elements of law natural and politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hölkeskamp, K. J. (2000). Fides—Deditio in fidere—Dextra data et accepta: Recht, Religion und Ritual in Rom. In C. Brunn (Ed.), The Roman middle republic. Politics, religion and historiography. 400–133 BC (Papers from Conference at the Institutum Romanum Finlandiae, September 11–12, 1998) (pp. 223–250). Rome: Institutum Romanum Finlandiae.Google Scholar
  51. Holton, R. (1994). Deciding to trust, coming to believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72(1), 63–76.Google Scholar
  52. Horváth, A., & Szakolczai, Á. (1992). The dissolution of communist power: The case of Hungary. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Hough, J. F. (1997). Democratization and revolution in the USSR, 1985–1991. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  54. Hunzinger, A. W. (1906). Das Furchtproblem in der katholischen Lehre von Augustin bis Luther. Leipzig: Deichert.Google Scholar
  55. Jaeger, H., & Eughien, S. J. (1957). Parrhesia et fiducia. Étude spirituelle des mots. Studia Patristica, 1, 221–239.Google Scholar
  56. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2002). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1, 45–71.Google Scholar
  57. Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24.Google Scholar
  58. Jones, E. E., et al. (Eds.). (1971). Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior Morristown. New Jersey: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kaser, M. (1956). Infamia und ignominia in den römischen Rechtsquellen, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung, 73, 220–278.Google Scholar
  60. Klandermans, B. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 519–531.Google Scholar
  61. Kochanowicz, J. (2004). Trust, confidence, and social capital in Poland: A historical perspective. Proceedings of the British Academy, 123, 63–83.Google Scholar
  62. Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1980). Polling on Watergate: The battle for public opinion. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(4), 530–547.Google Scholar
  63. Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1983). The battle for public opinion. The president, the press, and the polls during Watergate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Larson, D. W. (2004). Distrust: Prudent, if not always wise. In R. Hardin (Ed.), Distrust (pp. 34–59). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  65. Lee, M. K. O., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
  66. Levi, M. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507.Google Scholar
  67. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. J. (2005). Social atomism, holism, and trust. Sociological Quarterly, 26(4), 455–471.Google Scholar
  68. Li, L. (2004). Political trust in rural China. Modern China, 30(2), 228–258.Google Scholar
  69. Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. (1983). The decline of confidence in American institutions. Political Science Quarterly, 98(3), 379–402.Google Scholar
  70. Ljunggren, G. (1921). Zur Geschichte der christlichen Heilsgewissheit, von Augustin bis zur Hochscholastik, (PhD-dissertation) Göttingen.Google Scholar
  71. Locke, J. (1954). Essays in the law of nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  72. Locke, J. (2002). Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  74. Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence and trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  75. Maier, C. S. (1997). Dissolution: The crisis of communism and the end of East Germany. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.Google Scholar
  76. Marková, I. (2004). Introduction: Trust/risk and trust/fear. Proceedings of the British Academy, 123, 1–23.Google Scholar
  77. Mayntz, R. (1988). Soziale Diskontinuitäten: Erscheinungsformen und Ursachen. In K. Hierholzer & H. G. Wittmann (Eds.), Phasensprünge und Stetigkeit in der natürlichen und kulturellen Welt (pp. 15–37). Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  78. McLeod, J. M., Brown, J. D., & Becker, L. B. (1977). Watergate and the 1974 congressional elections. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 41(2), 181–195.Google Scholar
  79. Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964–1970. The American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951–972.Google Scholar
  80. Miller, A. H., Goldenberg, E. N., & Erbring, L. (1979). Type-set politics: impact of newspapers on public confidence. The American Political Science Review, 73(1), 67–84.Google Scholar
  81. Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (1997). Trust, distrust and scepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. The Journal of Politics, 59(2), 418–451.Google Scholar
  82. Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2005). What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 20(10), 1–129.Google Scholar
  83. Mureşan, I. (2006). Trust in political institutions in central and Eastern Europe. The Romanian Journal of Political Sciences, 6(1), 65–84.Google Scholar
  84. Mutti, A. (2000). Particularism and the modernization: Process in southern Italy. International Sociology, 15(4), 579–590.Google Scholar
  85. Newton, K. (2011). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22, 201–214.Google Scholar
  86. Newton, K. (2012). Taking a bet with ourselves: Can we put trust in trust? WZB Newsletter, 135, 6–8.Google Scholar
  87. Niemeyer, T. H. (1891). ‘Fiducia cum amico und depositum,’ Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung, 12, 297–324.Google Scholar
  88. Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 42–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Opp, K. D., & Gern, C. (1993). Dissident groups, personal networks, and spontaneous cooperation: The East German revolution of 1989. American Sociological Review, 58(5), 659–680.Google Scholar
  90. Parker, G. R., & Davidson, R. H. (1979). Why do Americans love their congressmen so much more than their congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4(1), 53–61.Google Scholar
  91. Parsons, T. (1969). Political and social structure. New York, London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  92. Pfaff, S. (1996). Collective identity and informal groups in revolutionary mobilization: East Germany in 1989. Social Forces, 75(1), 91–118.Google Scholar
  93. Plato. (2000). The republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Pollack, D. (2002). The change in religion and church in eastern Germany after 1989: A research note. Sociology of Religion, 63(3), 373–387.Google Scholar
  95. Putnam, R. D. (1992). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Rehman, S. U., et al. (2005). What to wear today? Effect of doctor’s attire on the trust and confidence of patients. The American Journal of Medicine, 118, 1279–1286.Google Scholar
  97. Sapsford, R., & Abbott, P. (2006). Trust, confidence and social environment in post-communist societies. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39, 59–71.Google Scholar
  98. Schudson, M. (1993). Watergate in American memory how we remember, forget, and reconstruct the past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  99. Seidl, E. (1952). PISTIS: In der griechischen Literatur bis zur Zeit des Peripatos, (PhD-dissertation) Innsbruck.Google Scholar
  100. Seligman, A. B., & Füzer, K. (1994). The problem of trust and the transition from state socialism. Comparative Social Research, 14, 193–221.Google Scholar
  101. Semmes, C. E. (1991). Developing trust: Patient-practitioner encounters in natural health care. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19(4), 450–470.Google Scholar
  102. Simmel, G. (2004). The philosophy of money. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  103. Smith, C. (2005). Understanding trust and confidence: Two paradigms and their significance for health and social care. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22, 299–316.Google Scholar
  104. Staritz, D. (1991). The relationship of socio-structural development and political culture in the GDR. In M. Gerber (Ed.), Studies in GDR culture and society (pp. 65–73). Washington: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  105. Suh, B., & Han, I. (2002). Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1, 247–263.Google Scholar
  106. Sztompka, P. (1996a). Trust in emerging democracy. Lessons from Poland. International Sociology Journal, 11(1), 37–63.Google Scholar
  107. Sztompka, P. (1996b). Looking back: The year 1989 as a cultural and civilizational break. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 29(2), 115–129.Google Scholar
  108. Sztompka, P. (1998). Trust, distrust and the paradox of democracy. European Journal of Social Theory, 1(1), 19–32.Google Scholar
  109. Thomas, J. G. (2001). Pistis und Wissen. Zur Frage nach der Gewißheit im stoischen Erkenntnisprozeß. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 42, 105–137.Google Scholar
  110. Thomas, A. (2006). Summa theologiae: Courage. In A. Ross & P. G. Walsh (Eds.), vol. 42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Tonkiss, F. (2009). Trust, confidence and economic crisis. Intereconomics, 44(4), 196–202.Google Scholar
  112. Unverhau, D. (Ed.). (1999). Lustration, Akteneröffnung, demokratischer Umbruch in Polen, Tschechien, der Slowakei und Ungarn. Hannover: LIT-Verlag.Google Scholar
  113. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Trust as a moral value. In D. Castiglione, J. W. van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), Handbook of social capital (pp. 101–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1989). Patronage in Roman society: From republic to empire. In A. Wallace-Hadrill (Ed.), Patronage in ancient society (pp. 63–87). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  116. Warf, B. (2011). Myths, realities, and lessons of the Arab spring. The Arab World Geographer, 14(2), 166–168.Google Scholar
  117. Weatherford, M. S. (1984). Economic ‘stagflation’ and public support for the political system. British Journal of Political Science, 14(2), 187–205.Google Scholar
  118. Weber, M. (2001). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.Google Scholar
  119. Zimmer, T. A. (1979). The impact of Watergate on the public’s trust in people and confidence in the mass media. Social Science Quarterly, 58(4), 743–752.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of LucerneLucerneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations