Human Studies

, Volume 33, Issue 2–3, pp 205–220 | Cite as

Santa or the Grinch: Paradoxes Presented by the Use of Today’s Popular Media

  • Terry Moellinger
Research Paper


This paper grew out of a larger study designed to investigate the usage patterns and effects of the introduction of the personal computer and the Internet in both the contemporary workplace and the home. During the course of analysis of the data collected several paradoxes associated with this usage emerged. The first, and in many ways the most important, was the paradox between the ability of Internet-based communication and software computer programs to facilitate the educational process while at the same time altering the learning patterns of the student users, affecting writing, and potentially affecting their cognitive processing. Secondly, while the usage of these technologies fulfilled the early expectations for creating a more efficient work place, it also created a new demand for increased production. This new expectation has blurred the line between professional and personal time with the usage of these technologies entering domestic space and has created the potential for anxiety and disjuncture. Thirdly, in research endeavors, these technologies have allowed people to collect and evaluate data in newer and quicker ways; however the demand for increased productivity has also altered the research function as attention is directed toward the production of papers and not the development of grander explanatory theories. Also, while the use of many Internet-based communication modalities promotes mobility, their constant use can also contribute to the avoidance of personal contact, isolation, and egocentric behavior. This paper describes these paradoxes and concludes by examining the emerging trends and patterns that these paradoxes have come to reinforce.


Learning Work Efficiency Demand Isolation Mobility 


  1. Brundage, A. (2008). Going to the sources: A guide to historical research and writing (4th ed.). Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson.Google Scholar
  2. Cairncross, F. (2001). The death of distance: How the communication revolution is changing our lives. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  3. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing a grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Chesebro, J. W. (1984). The media reality: Epistemological functions of media in cultural systems. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesebro, J. W., & Bertelsen, D. A. (1996). Analyzing media: Communication technologies as symbolic and cognitive systems. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  7. Dretzin, R. (2008). Growing up online [Film]. Available from Public Broadcasting System, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  8. Gebser, J. (1949 & 1953/1984). The ever present origin (trans: Barstad, N. & Mickunas, A.). Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussion. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
  11. Grossman, W. M. (1997). Net.Wars. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hall, E. T. (1983). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  13. Innis, H. A. (1950/1972). Empire and communication. Oxford: Claredon.Google Scholar
  14. Innis, H. A. (1951/2003). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lash, B. (2003). Memoir of a homebrew computer club member. Retrieved 7 Feb 2007.
  16. LeDous, J. (2002). Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  17. Mazlish, B. (1993). The fourth discontinuity: The co-evolution of humans and machines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  19. McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the message: An inventory of effects. Corte Madera, CA: Gingko Press Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Meyrowitz, J. (1982). Television and interpersonal behavior: Codes of perception and response. In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Intermedia: Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 253–272). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. MITS Altair 8800 and Santa. (1975). Retrieved July 9, 2009 from
  23. Mumford, L. (1934/1963). Technics and civilization. New York: Harcord Brace & Company.Google Scholar
  24. Ong, W. J. (1967). In the human grain: Further explorations of contemporary culture. New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
  25. Ong, W. J. (1977). Interfaces of the word: Studies in the evolution of consciousness and culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ong, W. J. (1982/2003). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Palfrey, J. G., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  29. Richie, D. A. (2003). Doing oral history: A practical guide (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Robertson, G. (2007). The history of the personal computer in TV commercials. Retrieved August 16, 2007 from
  31. Rosenzwig, R., & Thelen, D. (1998). The presence of the past: Popular uses of history in American life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schwartz, J. M., & Begley, S. (2002). The mind and the brain: Neuroplasticity and the power of mental force. New York: Regan Books.Google Scholar
  33. Segaller, S. (Producer/Director), Cringely, R. X., & Gau, J. (Writers). (1998). Nerds 2.0.1: A brief history of the internet [Television Broadcast]. Alexandria, VA: Public Broadcasting Service.Google Scholar
  34. Seuss, D. (1957). The grinch that stole christmas. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  35. Small, G., & Vorgan, G. (2008). iBrain: Surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  36. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  41. Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  42. Wozniak, S. (2004). Homebrew and how the apple came to be. Retrieved December 26, 2006 from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations