Skip to main content
Log in

Theorizing Politics After Camus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theorizing has been conceived historically in illuminative and ocular metaphors, and as an activity that occurs in a fixed and privileged relation to political society that permits a panoramic perspective. These elements of light, sight, and distance, are supportable existentially and ethically in post-war, post-Holocaust world. One of the first to explore the challenges to theorizing in this era was Albert Camus. He provided phenomenological and existential investigations of the obstacles to theorizing politics in his literary works, particularly his trilogy of novels: The Stranger, The Plague, and The Fall. In this paper, I offer a reading of these novels that isolates theorizing as an activity performed not from a transcendent perceptual vantage of perfect light and vision, but from the immanent perspectives achieved in the city, among friends, or by exile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, M. (1988). The Fall: In flight. In Critical essays on Albert Camus (pp.140–145). Boston: G.K. Hall.

  • Bronner, S. E. (1999). Camus: Portrait of a moralist. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1942). The Stranger. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1948). The Plague. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1956). The Fall. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1965). Notebooks, 1942–1951. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1968). Lyrical and critical essays. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1980). Neither victims nor executioners. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, H. S. (1987). Between commitment and delusion: The obstructed path & the sea change 1930–1965. Middleton: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBanc, R. L., & Jones, C. M. (2003). Space/place and home: prefiguring contemporary political and religious discourse in Albert Camus’s The Plague. Contemporary Political Theory, 2, 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1954). On truth and lie in an extra-moral sense. In W. Kaufmann (Ed.), The portable Nietzsche (pp. 42–47). New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, F. (1979). Marxism, mysticism, and liberty: The influence of Simone Weil on Albert Camus. Political Theory, 7, 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrody, P. (1957). Albert Camus: A study of his work. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1988). In the company of critics: Social criticism and political commitment in the twentieth century. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. D. (1981). The intellectual resistance in Europe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher C. Robinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, C.C. Theorizing Politics After Camus. Hum Stud 32, 1–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-008-9105-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-008-9105-x

Keywords

Navigation