Human Studies

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 469–497 | Cite as

Accountably Other: Trust, Reciprocity and Exclusion in a Context of Situated Practice



The first part of this paper makes five points: First, the problem of Otherness is different and differently constructed in modern differentiated societies. Therefore, approaches to Otherness based on traditional notions of difference and boundary between societies and systems of shared belief will not suffice; Second, because solidarity can no longer be maintained through boundaries between ingroup and outgroup, social cohesion has to take a different form; Third, to the extent that Otherness is not a condition of demographic, or belief based, exclusion in modern societies, but rather something that happens to people otherwise available to one another in interaction, othering is a processthat occurs over the course of interaction, turn by turn, not a set of beliefs or a state of mind; Fourth, othering may be supported by accounts and narratives, and these may exist before the fact – or be articulated after the fact. But, over the course of an ongoing interaction, beliefs and narratives do not explain what goes wrong with practices; Fifth, practices require reciprocity and trust. Therefore, practices require a morestringent form of morality – not a less stringent form – and moresocial cohesion – not less – than traditional society.

The second part of the paper illustrates these five points with an extended analysis of a cross-race interaction in which accounts are invoked, reciprocity breaks down, and participants are rendered as Accountable Others.


account cross-race interaction justice narrative other othering race reflexivity trust 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Coates, D. and Rawls, A. (2005). Trust, Trouble, and Lies: Language Games of Blindness. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
  2. David, G. (2005). ‘Making Change’ in an Arab-owned Convenience Store. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
  3. Du Bois, W.E.B. (1903/2004). The Souls of Black Folk. Boulder: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  4. Durkheim, E. (1893/1933). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Garfinkel, H. (1948/2006). Seeing Sociologically. Boulder: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  6. Garfinkel, H. (1963). A Conception of and Experiments with ‘Trust’ as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions. In Motivation and Social Interaction. O.J. Harvey. (Ed.) New York: The Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  7. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism. Ed. and with an introducton by A. W. Rawls. Boulder: Rowman and Lifflefield.Google Scholar
  9. Goffman, E (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  10. Levi-Strauss, C. (1962) Totemism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Levine D. (1988). Flight from Ambiguity: Essays in Social and Cultural Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Manning, P.K. (1976). The Decline of Civility: A Comment on Erving Goffman's Sociology. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 13: 13–25.Google Scholar
  13. Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Patterson, O. (1985). Slavery and Social Death. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rawls, A.W. (2005a). Introduction. In H. Garfinkel. A. Rawls (Ed.) Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rawls, A.W. (2005b). Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim's The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rawls, A.W. (2004). Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim's The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rawls, A.W. (2002). Editor's Introduction. In Garfinkel (2002).Google Scholar
  19. Rawls, A.W. (2000). Race as an Interaction Order Phenomena: W.E.B. DuBois's ‘Double Consciousness’ Thesis Revisited. Sociological Theory 18, 2: 239–272.Google Scholar
  20. Rawls, A.W. (1990). Emergent Sociality: A Dialectic of Commitment and Order. Symbolic Interaction 13: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rawls, A.W. (1987). The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman's Contribution to Social Theory. Sociological Theory. (5)2: 136–149.Google Scholar
  22. Reisman, D. (1950). The Lonely Crowd. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sacks, H. (1992/1995). Lectures on Conversation, Vols. 1 & 2. Ed. G. Jefferson and with an Introduction by E.A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). The Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turntaking in Conversation. Language 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation. Language 53, 2: 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simmel, G. (1950). The Stranger. In The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Trans. K. Wolff. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Associate Professor of SociologyBentley CollegeWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations