Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 187–203 | Cite as

Quotas on Narwhal (Monodon monoceros) Hunting in East Greenland: Trends in Narwhal Killed per Hunter and Potential Impacts of Regulations on Inuit Communities

  • Martin Reinhardt Nielsen
  • Henrik Meilby
Article

Abstract

This study evaluates the introduction of quotas on narwhal hunting in East Greenland with respect to effects on Inuit culture and based on trends in narwhal killed per hunter and assessment of migration patterns. Cultural aspects were assessed through group discussions and comparison between East and Northwest Greenland. Trends in narwhal killed/hunter were modeled from catch statistics using information on number of hunters and climate and ice cover data for the period 1993–2004. Results indicate negative impacts of quotas on Inuit culture; did not detect negative trends in narwhal killed/hunter; and suggest south-west-bound migration, implying potential immigration from non-hunted populations that was not considered in quota setting. The implementation of quotas without local consultations and legal basis in the relevant executive order is therefore in our opinion inappropriate. Conservation and sustainable use of narwhal stocks may be more likely to succeed if local communities are involved through co-management agreements.

Keywords

Small whale hunting Hunting quotas Traditional culture Ice cover trends Co-management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the people of East and Northwest Greenland for their hospitality and the hunter’s organizations and local administration in Ittoqqortoormiit and Ammassalik municipalities for providing information for this study. Thanks to the Hunting Division of the Directorate for Fisheries, Hunting and Agriculture for providing access to the Piniarneq catch statistics and to Frank Sejersen, Elmer Topp-Jørgensen, Fernando Ugarte, Mads Peter Heide-Jørgensen, Kristine Laidre and Natasja Kingod for useful information and comments on earlier drafts. This study was carried out with funding from the Centre for Macro Ecology, Evolution and Climate at the University of Copenhagen and the Danish National Research Foundation.

References

  1. Aastrup, P., Egevang, C., Lyberth, B. and Tamstorf, M.P. (2005). Naturbeskyttelse og turisme i Nord- og Østgrønland. Faglig rapport fra DMU, nr. 545. [In Danish]Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. (2002). The regulatory community: Decentralization and the environment in the van panchayats (forest councils) of Kumaon’. Paper presented at the World Resource Institutes workshop on Decentralization and the environment, 18-22 February, Bellagio, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. Albrechtsen, B. (2001). Hvalerne i Nuussuaq. Delingsprincipper, udveksling af social samhørighed blandt fangerbefolkningen i det Nordlige Upernavik distrikt. MSc Thesis, Department of Eskimology, University of Copenhagen. [In Danish]Google Scholar
  4. Armitage, D. R. (2005). Community-based Narwhal management in Nunavut, Canada: change, uncertainty and adaptation. Society and Natural Resources 18: 715–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes, F. (1994). Co-management: Bridging the two solitudes. Northern Perspectives 22: 18–20.Google Scholar
  6. Berkes, F., and Jolly, D. (2001). Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western arctic community. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 18.Google Scholar
  7. Berkes, F., Berkes, M. K., and Fast, H. (2007). Collaborative integrated management in Canada’s north: the role of local and traditional knowledge and community-based monitoring. Costal Management 35: 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodenhorn, B. (2000). He used to be my relative: Exploring the bases of relatedness among Inupiat of northern Alaska. In Carsten, J. (ed.), Culture of relatedness: New approaches to the study of kinship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 128–148.Google Scholar
  9. Boertmann, D., Olsen, K. and Nielsen, R.D. (2009). Seabirds and marine mammals in the Northeast Greenland. Aerial surveys in spring and summer 2008. Technical Report N. 721. National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus University, Denmark. http://www.dmu.dk/Pub/FR721.pdf
  10. Born, E.W. (1983). Havpattedyr og havfugle i Scoresbysund: Fangst og forekomst. Råstofforvaltningen for Grønland og Grønlands fiskeri- og miljøundersøgelser. 112 s. [In Danish]Google Scholar
  11. Brockington, D., and Igoe, J. (2006). Eviction for conservation: a global overview. Conservation and Society 4(3): 424–470.Google Scholar
  12. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Castro, A. P., and Nielsen, E. (2001). Indigenous people and co-management: Implications for conflict management. Environmental Science and Policy 4: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caulfield, R. A. (1993). Aboriginal subsistence whaling in Greenland: the case of Qeqertarsuaq municipality in West Greenland. Arctic 46(2): 144–155.Google Scholar
  15. Caulfield, R. A. (1997). Greenlanders, whales and whaling: Sustainability and self-determination in the Arctic. University press of New England, London.Google Scholar
  16. Cernea, M. M., and Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2006). Poverty risks and national parks: Policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World Development 34(10): 1808–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clever, F. (2000). Moral ecological rationality, institutions and the management of common property resources. Development and Change 31: 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collings, P. (1997). Subsistence hunting and wildlife management in the central Canadian Arctic. Arctic Anthropology 34(1): 41–56.Google Scholar
  19. Condon, R. G., Collings, P., and Wenzel, G. (1995). The best part of life: subsistence hunting, ethnicity and economic adaptation among young adult Inuit males. Arctic 48(1): 31–46.Google Scholar
  20. Dahl, J. (1989). The integrative and cultural role of hunting and subsistence in Greenland. Études/Inuit/Studies 13(1): 23–42.Google Scholar
  21. Dahl, J. (2000). Saqqaq: An Inuit hunting community in the modern world. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  22. Dale, A., and Armitage, D. (2011). Marine mammal co-management in Canada’s Arctic: knowledge co-production for learning and adaptive capacity. Marine Policy 35: 440–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Danielsen, F., Balete, D. S., Poulsen, M. K., Enghoff, M., Nozawa, C. M., and Jensen, A. E. (2000). A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1671–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D., and Balmford, A. (2005). Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2507–2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Danielsen, F., Mendoza, M. M., Tagtag, A., Alviola, P. A., Balete, D. S., Jensen, A. E., Enghopp, M., and Poulsen, M. K. (2007). Increasing conservation management action by involving local people in natural resource monitoring. Ambio 36(7): 566–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, J. L., Grauvogel, C. A., and Valkenburg, P. (1985). Changes in subsistence harvest of Alaska’s Western Arctic Caribou Herd. Proceedings of the North American Caribou Workshop 2: 595–604.Google Scholar
  27. Dietz, R., Heide-Jørgensen, M.P. and Born, E.W. (1985). Havpattedyr i Østgrønland: En litteraturundersøgelse. Rapport til Råstofforvaltningen for Grønland og Grønlands fiskeri- og miljøundersøgelser. Danbiu Aps. pp. 277.Google Scholar
  28. Dietz, R., Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., Born, E. W., and Glahder, C. M. (1994). Occurrence of narwhals (Monodon monocerus) and white whales (Delphinapterus leucas) in East Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland. Bioscience 39: 69–86.Google Scholar
  29. Dietz, R., Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., Richards, P., and Aquarone, M. (2001). Summer and fall movements of narwhals (Monodon monoceros) from northeastern Baffin Island towards northern Davis strait. Arctic 54: 244–262.Google Scholar
  30. Dowsley, M. (2009). Community clusters in wildlife and environmental management: Using TEK and community involvement to improve co-management in an era of rapid environmental change. Polar Research 28: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dowsley, M., and Wenzel, G. (2008). “The time of the most polar bears”: a co-management conflict in Nunavut. Arctic 61(2): 177–189.Google Scholar
  32. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., and Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic field notes, 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Huntington, H. P., and Frost, K. J. (2006). Interaction or Co-optation? Traditional knowledge and science in the Alaska Beluga Whale committee. Environmental Conservation 33(4): 306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Hays, J. U., Huntington, H. P., Andrew, R., and Goodwin, W. (2008). Ambivalence towards formalizing customary resource management norms among Alaska Native Beluga whale hunters and Tohono O’odham livestock owners. Human Organization 67(2): 137–150.Google Scholar
  35. Fimbel, C., Curran, B., and Usongo, U. (2000). Enhancing the sustainability of duiker hunting through community participation and controlled access in the Lobeke region of south-eastern Cameroon. In Robinson, J. G., and Bennett, E. L. (eds.), Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests. Chapter 18. Colombia University press, New York, pp. 356–374.Google Scholar
  36. Ford, J. D., Smith, B., and Wandel, J. (2006). Vulnerability to climate change in the Arctic: a case study from Arctic Bay, Canada. Global Environmental Change 16: 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Freeman, M. M. R. (1989). Graphs and gaffs: A cautionary tale in the common property resource debate. In Berkes, F. (ed.), Common property resources: Ecology and community-based sustainable development. Belhaven Press, New York, pp. 92–109.Google Scholar
  38. Freeman, M. M. R. (1993). The International Whaling Commission, small type whaling and coming to terms with subsistence. Human Organization 52: 243–251.Google Scholar
  39. Furgal, C., Innes, S., and Kovacs, K. M. (2002). Inuit spring hunting techniques and local knowledge of the ringed seal in Arctic Bay (Ikpiarjuk), Nunavut. Polar Research 21: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. GHRG. (2004). Hjemmestyrets bekendtgørelse nr. 2 af 12 februar 2004 om beskyttelse og fangst af hvid- og narhvaler. http://www.lovgivning.gl/gh.gl-love/dk/2004/bkg/bkg_nr_02–2004_dk.htm. accessed 17.10.2009. Greenland Home Rule Government. [In Danish]
  41. Gibson, C., McKean, M., and Ostrom, E. (2000). Explaining deforestation: The role of local institutions. In Gibson, C., McKean, M., and Ostrom, E. (eds.), People and forests: Communities, institutions and governance. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  42. Gilchrist, G., Mallory, M., and Merkel, F. (2005). Can local ecological knowledge contribute to wildlife management? Case studies of migratory birds. Ecology and Society 10(1): 20.Google Scholar
  43. Gjertz, I. (1991). The narwhal, Monodon monoceros, in the Norwegian high Arctic. Marine Mammal Science 7: 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Glahder, C. (1995). Hunting in Kangerlussuaq, East Greenland, 1951–1991: An assessment of local knowledge. Meddelelser om Grønland, Man & Society 19.Google Scholar
  45. Gloerson, P., Cavalieri, D., Campbell, W. J., and Zwally, J. (1990). Nimbus-7 SMMR polar radiances and Arctic and Antarctic sea ice concentrations. National Snow and Ice Data Center. CD-ROM, Boulder.Google Scholar
  46. Harley, S. J., Myers, R. A., and Dunn, A. (2001). Is catch-per-unit-effort proportional to abundance? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1760–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Harwood, L. A., Norton, P., Day, B., and Hall, P. A. (2002). The harvest of Beluga Whales in Canada’s Western Arctic: hunter-based monitoring of size and composition of the catch. Arctic 55(1): 10–20.Google Scholar
  48. Heide-Jørgensen, M. P. (2004). Aerial digital photographic surveys of narwhal, Monodon monoceros, in West Greenland. Marine Mammal Science 20(2): 246–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Heide-Jørgensen, M.P. (2009). Reconstructing catch statistics for narwhals in Greenland 1862 to 2008. A preliminary compilation. JWG-2009–07. In: Report of the Joint Meeting of the NAMMCO Scientific Committee Working Group on the Population Status of Narwhal and Beluga in the North Atlantic and the Canada/Greenland Joint Commission on Conservation and Management of Narwhal and Beluga Scientific Working Group. Winnipeg, Canada, 17–20 February 2009.Google Scholar
  50. Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., and Acquarone, M. (2002). Size and trends of the bowhead whale, beluga and narwhal stocks wintering off West Greenland. NAMMCO Scientific Publications 4: 191–210.Google Scholar
  51. Heide-Jørgensen, M.P., Hemmeken, N. and Hollebeek, P. (2002). Optælling af Narhvaler i Qaanaaq Kommune i august 2001. – Grønlands Naturinstitut, teknisk rapport nr. 50. [In Danish]Google Scholar
  52. Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., Dietz, R., Laidre, K. L., Richards, P., Orr, J., and Schmidt, H. C. (2003). The migratory habits of narwhal. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81: 1298–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., Dietz, R., Laidre, K. L., Nicklen, P., Garde, E., Richard, P., and Orr, J. (2008). Resighting of a narwhal (Monodon monoceros) instrumented with a satellite transmitter. Arctic 61(4): 395–398.Google Scholar
  54. Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., Laidre, K. L., Burt, M. L., Borchers, D. L., Marques, T. A., Hansen, R. G., Rasmussen, M., and Fossette, S. (2010). Abundance of narwhals (Monodon monoceros) on the hunting grounds in Greenland. Journal of Mammalogy 91(5): 1135–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hill, K., and Padwe, J. (2000). Sustainability of Ache hunting in Mbaracayu Reserve, Paraguay. In Robinson, J. G., and Bennett, E. L. (eds.), Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests. Colombia University press, New York, pp. 79–105. Chapter 5.Google Scholar
  56. Holland, M. M., and Blitz, C. M. (2003). Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models. Climate Dynamics 21: 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hovelsrud, G. K., McKenna, M., and Huntington, H. P. (2008). Marine mammal harvests and other interactions with humans. Ecological Applications 18(2): S135–S147. Supplement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Huntington, H. P. (2000). Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1270–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. JCNB/NAMMCO. (2004). Joint Scientific Meeting. NAMMCO Scientific Committee Working Group on the Population Status of Narwhal and Beluga in the North Atlantic and the Canada/Greenland Joint Commission on Conservation and Management of Narwhal and Beluga Scientific Working Group. Montreal, Canada, February 3–6, 2004.Google Scholar
  60. JCNB/NAMMCO. (2005). NAMMCO Scientific Committee Working Group on the Population Status of Narwhal and Beluga in the North Atlantic and the Canada/Greenland Joint Commission on Conservation and Management of Narwhal and Beluga Scientific Working Group. Join Scientific Meeting, Nuuk, Greenland, October 13–16, 2005.Google Scholar
  61. Johannes, R. E. (1998). The case for data-less marine resource management: examples from tropical near shore fisheries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Joshi, N. V., and Gadgil, M. (1991). On the role of refugia in promoting prudent use of biological resources. Theoretical Population Biology 40: 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kaplan, I. M., and McCay, B. J. (2004). Cooperative Research, Co-management and the Social Dimension of Fisheries Science and Management. Marine Policy 28: 257–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kattsov, V. M., and Kallen, E. (2005). Future climate change modeling and scenarios for the Arctic. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment Scientific Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 99–150.Google Scholar
  65. Kilabuk, P. (1998). A study of Inuit Knowledge of the Southern Baffin Beluga. Report prepared for the Southeast Baffin Beluga Management Committee. Nunavut Management Board, Iqaluit.Google Scholar
  66. Klein, D. R., Moorhead, L., Kruse, J., and Braund, S. R. (1999). Contrasts in use and perceptions of biological data for caribou management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27(2): 488–498.Google Scholar
  67. KNR (2008). 48 døde narhvaler efterladt ved Illoqqortoormiut. Online news buleting from Greenlandic Broadcasting Corporation August 25th. http://knr.gl/index.php?id=183&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=37198&cHash=fe81278b27. [In Danish]
  68. Kofinas, G., Lyver, P., Russell, D., White, R., Nielson, A., and Flanders, N. (2001). Towards a protocol for community monitoring of caribou body condition. Rangifer, Special issue 14: 43–52.Google Scholar
  69. Kruse, J., Klein, D., Braund, S., Moorehead, L., and Simeon, B. (1998). Co-management of natural resources: A comparison of two Caribou Management Systems. Human Organization 57: 447–458.Google Scholar
  70. Laidler, G. J. (2006). Inuit and scientific perspectives on the relationship between sea ice and climate change: the ideal complement? Climate Change 78: 407–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Laidre, K. L., and Heide-Jørgensen, M. P. (2005). Arctic Sea ice trends and Narwhal vulnerability. Biological Conservation 121: 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Larsen, F., Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., Martin, A. R., and Born, E. W. (1994). Line-transect estimation of abundance of narwhals (Monoceros monodon) in Scoresby Sund and adjacent waters. Meddelelser om Grønland. Bioscience 39: 87–91.Google Scholar
  73. Lloyd-Evans, S. (2006). Focus groups. In Desai, V., and Potter, D. (eds.), Doing development research Chapter 16. SAGE Publications, London, pp. 153–163.Google Scholar
  74. Maslanik, J., and Stroeve, J. (2008). DMSP SSM/I daily polar gridded brightness temperatures, 1993–2004. National Snow and Ice Data Centre. Digital media, Boulder.Google Scholar
  75. Metcalf, V., and Robards, M. (2008). Sustaining a healthy human-walrus relationship in a dynamic environment: challenges for co-management. Ecological Applications 18(2): S148–S156. Supplement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Milner-Gulland, E. J., and Rowcliffe, J. M. (2007). Conservation and sustainable use: A handbook of techniques. Techniques in ecology and conservation series. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P.O. and Kislaioglu, M. (2004). Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: Monitoring populations for co-management. Ecology and Society 9(3): article 2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art2/
  78. Morseth, M. C. (1997). Twentieth-century changes in Beluga Whale Hunting and Butchering by Kanigmiut of Buckland, Alaska. Arctic 50(3): 241–255.Google Scholar
  79. Nadasdy, P. (2003). Re-evaluating the co-management success story. Arctic 56(4): 367–380.Google Scholar
  80. Nadasdy, P. (2005). The anti-politics of TEK: the institutionalization of co-management and practice discourse. Anthropologica 47(2): 215–232.Google Scholar
  81. NAMMCO. (1999). North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission. Annual Report. pp. 168. Tromsø, Norway.Google Scholar
  82. Naughton-Treves, L., and Sanderson, S. (1995). Property politics and wildlife conservation. World Development 23(8): 1265–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nielsen, M. R. (2009). Is climate change causing increasing narwhal (Monodon monoseros) catches in Smith Sound, Greenland? Polar Research 28: 238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Noble, B. F. (2000). Institutional criteria for co-management. Marine Policy 24: 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Novaro, A. J., Redford, K. H., and Bodmer, R. E. (2000). Effect of hunting in source-sink systems in the Neotropics. Conservation Biology 14(3): 713–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Novaro, A. J., Funes, M. C., and Walker, R. S. (2005). An empirical test of source-sink dynamics induced by hunting. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 910–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nuttal, M., Berkes, F., Forbes, B., Kofinas, G., Vlassova, T., and Wenzel, G. (2005). Hunting, herding, fishing, and gathering: Indigenous peoples and renewable resource use in the Arctic. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Scientific report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Chapter 12.Google Scholar
  88. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. F., Norgaard, R. B., and Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284: 278–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Palsbøll, P. J., Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., and Dietz, R. (1997). Population structure and seasonal movements of Narwhals, Monodon monoceros, determined from mtDNA Analysis. Heredity 78: 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Patton, M. Q. (2003). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  91. Plummer, R., and FitzGibbon, J. (2004). Co-management of natural resources: a proposed framework. Environmental Management 33(6): 876–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rasmussen, R.O. (2005). Analyse af fangerhvervet i Grønland. Unpublished report. Greenland Home Rule Government. [In Danish]Google Scholar
  93. Ribot, J. C. (2004). Waiting for democracy: The politics of choice in natural resource decentralizations. World Resources Institute, Washington.Google Scholar
  94. Richard, P. R., and Pike, D. G. (1993). Small Whale Co-management in the Eastern Canadian Arctic: a case history and analysis. Arctic 46(2): 138–143.Google Scholar
  95. Russel, D., Kofinas, G., and Griffith, B. (2000). Need and opportunity for a North American Caribou knowledge cooperative. Polar Research 19(1): 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sejersen, F. (1998). Strategies for sustainability and management of people: An analysis of hunting and environmental perceptions in Greenland with a special focus on Sisimiut. PhD dissertation, Department of Eskimology, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  97. Sejersen, F. (2001). Hunting and management of Beluga Whales (Delphinapterus leucas) in Greenland: changing strategies to cope with new national and local interests. Arctic 54(4): 431–443.Google Scholar
  98. Sejersen, F. (2003). Grønlands naturforvaltning: Ressourcer og fangstrettigheder. Akademisk forlag A/S. Denmark. [In Danish]Google Scholar
  99. Stevenson, M. (2006). The possibility of difference: rethinking co-management. Human Organization 65(2): 167–180.Google Scholar
  100. Sutinen, J. G., and Kuperan, K. (1999). A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance. International Journal of Social Economics 26(1,2,3): 174–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Toudal, L. (1999). Ice extent in the Greenland Sea 1978–1995. Deep Sea Research II 46: 1237–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tyrrell, M. (2006). More bears, less bears: Inuit and scientific perceptions of polar bear populations on the west coast of Hudson Bay. Inuit Studies 30(2): 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tyrrell, M. (2007). Sentient beings and wildlife resources: Inuit, Beluga Whales and management regimes in the Canadian Arctic. Human Ecology 35(5): 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Usher, P. J. (1993). The Beverly-Kaminurika caribou management board: an experience in co-management. In Inglis, J. T. (ed.), Traditional ecological knowledge: Concepts and cases. IDRC Books, Ottawa, pp. 111–120.Google Scholar
  105. Walsh, J. E. (2008). Climate of the Arctic marine environment. Ecological Applications 18(2): S3–S22. Supplement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wenzel, G. W. (1991). Animal rights, human rights: Ecology, economy and ideology in the Canadian Arctic. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  107. Witting, L. and Heide-Jørgensen, M.P. (2009). Assessment runs for East Greenland. Report of the Joint Meeting of the NAMMCO Scientific Committee Working Group on the Population Status of Narwhal and Beluga in the North Atlantic and the Canada/Greenland Joint Commission on Conservation and Management of Narwhal and Beluga Scientific Working Group. JWG–2009–10. Winnipeg, Canada, 17–20 February 2009.Google Scholar
  108. Yandel, T. (2003). The challenge of building successful stakeholder organizations: New Zealand’s experience in developing a fisheries co-management regime. Marine Policy 27: 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Forest and Landscape, Faculty of Life SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg C.Denmark

Personalised recommendations