Advertisement

Husserl Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 225–245 | Cite as

Affectively Driven Perception: Toward a Non-representational Phenomenology

  • Matt Bower
Article

Abstract

While classical phenomenology, as represented by Edmund Husserl’s work, resists certain forms of representationalism about perception, I argue that in its theory of horizons, it posits representations in the sense of content-bearing vehicles. As part of a phenomenological theory, this means that on the Husserlian view such representations are part of the phenomenal character of perceptual experience. I believe that, although the intuitions supporting this idea are correct, it is a mistake to maintain that there are such representations defining the phenomenal character of low-level perception. What these representations are called on to explain, i.e., the phenomenal character of perceiving objects in their full presence, can be more parsimoniously explained by appealing to certain affective states or affect schemas that shape the intentional directedness of low-level perceptual experience and define its phenomenal character in a non-representational way. This revision of the Husserlian view, it is shown, also helps us understand the normative character of perception.

Keywords

Perceptual Experience Perceptual Sense Phenomenal Character Representational Content Worldly Matter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, M., & Rosenberg, G. (2008). Content and action: The guidance theory of representation. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 29(1–2), 55–86.Google Scholar
  2. Balle, J. D. (2008). Husserls typisierende Apperzeption und die Phänomenologie dynamischer Intentionalität. In F. Mattens (Ed.), Meaning and language: Phenomenological perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, M. (2008). Holism and horizon: Husserl and McDowell on non-conceptual content. Husserl Studies, 24, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, M. (2011). The intentional spectrum: Phenomenology and the Pittsburgh neo-hegelians. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barrett, L. (2011). Beyond the brain: How body and environment shape animal and human minds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, L. F., & Bar, M. (2009). See it with feeling: Affective predictions during object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1325–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett, L. F., & Bliss-Moreau, E. (2009). Affect as a psychological primitive. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 167–218). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Christensen, C. (1993). Sense, subject, and horizon. Research in Phenomenology, 53(4), 749–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colombetti, G. (2013). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cunningham, S. (1986). Representation: Rorty vs. Husserl. Synthese, 66(2), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Drummond, J. (1990). Husserlian intentionality and non-foundational realism: Noema and object. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drummond, J. (2003). The structure of intentionality. In D. Welton (Ed.), The new Husserl: A critical reader. Bloomington: Indianan University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fodor, J. (1981). RePresentations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Frijda, N. (2010). Impulsive action and motivation. Biological Psychology, 84, 570–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frijda, N., & Parrott, W. G. (2011). Basic emotions or Ur-emotions? Emotion Review, 3, 406–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallagher, S. (2008). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geniusas, S. (2012). The origins of the horizon in Husserl’s phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  21. Gurwitsch, A. (2009). In J. García-Gómez (Ed./Trans.) The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (19011973), Vol. 1: Constitutive phenomenology in historical perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Hatzimoysis, A. (2003). Emotional feelings and intentionalism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 52, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hopp, W. (2011). Perception and knowledge: A phenomenological account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hua I. Husserl, E. (1973). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. S. Strasser (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. D. Cairns (Trans.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
  25. Hua III. Husserl, E. (1950). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenlogie und phänomenlogischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. W. Biemel (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, First Book. F. Kersten (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983.Google Scholar
  26. Hua IV. Husserl, E. (1977). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Zweites Buch. K. Schuhmann (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, second book. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.Google Scholar
  27. Hua XI. Husserl, E. (1966). Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten, 1918-1926. M. Fleischer (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic. A. Steinbock (Trans.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
  28. Hua IX. Husserl, E. (1968). Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester. 1925. W. Biemel (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; Phenomenological psychology: Lectures, summer semester 1925. J. Scanlon (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977.Google Scholar
  29. Hua XVI. Husserl, E. (1973). Ding und Raum. Vorlesungen 1907. U. Claesges (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973; Thing and space: Lectures of 1907. R. Rojcewicz (Trans./Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
  30. Hua XIX. Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. In zwei Bänden. U. Panzer (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; Logical investigations, Vol. 2. J. N. Findlay (Trans.), D. Moran (Ed.). London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
  31. Hua XXXI. Husserl, E. (2000). Aktive Synthesen: Aus der Vorlesung ‘Transzendentale Logik’ 1920/21. R. Breeur (Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic. A. Steinbock (Trans.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
  32. Hua XXXVIII. Husserl, E. (2004). Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit: Texte aus dem Nachlass (1893-1912). T. Vongehr and R. Giuliani (Eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
  33. Hua XXXIX. Husserl, E. (2008). Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution, Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916-1937). R. Sowa (Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Hua Mat VIII. Husserl, E. (2006). Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (19291934): Die C-Manuskripte. D. Lohmar (Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Husserl, E. (1973). Experience and judgment: Investigations in a genealogy of logic. J. S. Churchill, K. Ameriks and L. Eley (Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hutto, D. (2005). Knowing what? Radical versus conservative enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hutto, D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hutto, D. (2012). Truly enactive emotion. Emotion Review, 4(2), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kuhn, H. (1968). The phenomenological concept of “horizon”. In M. Farber (Ed.), Philosophical essays in honor of Edmund Husserl (pp. 106–123). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lohmar, D. (2003). Husserl’s type and Kant’s schemata. In D. Welton (Ed.), The new Husserl: A critical reader (pp. 93–124). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87(3), 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McIntyre, R. (1986). Husserl and the representational theory of mind. Topoi, 5, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McIntyre, R., & Smith, D. W. (1989). Theory of intentionality. In J. N. Mohanty & W. McKenna (Eds.), Husserl’s phenomenology: A textbook (pp. 147–179). Washington: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  45. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. C. Smith, (Trans.). New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  46. Nanay, B. (2010). Perception and imagination: A-modal perception as mental imagery. Philosophical Studies, 150, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nanay, B. (2011). Do we sense modalities with our sense modalities? Ratio, 3, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Natsoulas, T. (2013). Consciousness and perceptual experience: An ecological and phenomenological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Noë, A. (2007). The critique of pure phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nuki, S. (1998). The theory of association after Husserl: “Form/content” dualism and the phenomenological way out. Continental Philosophy Review, 31, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Orlandi, N. (2011). The innocent eye: Seeing-as without concepts. American Philosophical Quarterly, 48(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
  54. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pan, J. S., Bingham, N., & Bingham, G. P. (2013). Embodied memory: Effective and stable perception by combining optic flow and image structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi: 10.1037/a0032070.
  56. Rabanaque, L. R. (2003). Hyle, genesis, noema. Husserl Studies, 19, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rodemeyer, L. (2006). Intersubjective Temporality: It's About Time. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Rowlands, M. (2006a). Body language: Representation in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rowlands, M. (2006b). Sensorimotor activity. Psyche, 12(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  60. Rowlands, M. (2010). The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schütz, A. (2011). In L. Embree (Ed.), Collected papers, volume 5: Phenomenology and the social sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Shim, M. (2005). The duality of non-conceptual content in Husserl’s phenomenology of perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shim, M. (2011). Representationalism and Husserlian phenomenology. Husserl Studies, 27(3), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Siegel, S. (2009). The visual experience of causation. The Philosophical Quarterly, 59, 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, D. W. (2007). Husserl. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, D. W., & McIntyre, R. (1975). Husserl’s identification of meaning and noema. The Monist, 59(1), 115–132.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, D. W., & McIntyre, R. (1984). Husserl and intentionality: A study of mind, meaning, and language. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Sokolowski, R. (2008). Phenomenology of the human person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stapleton, M. (2013). Steps to a properly embodied cognitive science. Cognitive Systems Research, 22, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stepp, N., & Turvey, M. T. (2010). On strong anticipation. Cognitive Systems Research, 11, 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Taraborelli, D., & Mossio M. (2008). On the relation between the enactive and the sensorimotor approach to perception. Consciousness and Cognition 17(4), 1343–1344.Google Scholar
  72. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Tye, M. (2002). Representationalism and the transparency of experience. Nous, 36(1), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. White, B., et al. (1970). Seeing with the skin. Perception and Psychophysics, 7(1), 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhok, A. (2013). On the reality of percepts: Husserl and Gibson. Phenomenology and Mind, 4, 46–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Religious StudiesBeloit CollegeBeloitUSA

Personalised recommendations