Kenneth Liberman, Husserl’s Criticism of Reason: With Ethnomethodological Specifications.
- 86 Downloads
In this work, Kenneth Liberman explores the reflective enterprise that we call phenomenology. His goal is to further develop the potential of thinking reason. While he recognizes the importance of Husserl’s reflexive rigor in advancing this field, he argues that Garfinkel’s ethnomethodological rigor can give new momentum to the phenomenological critique of reason, a critique on which the future of freedom depends (p. xv).
When Harold Garfinkel introduced ethnomethodology as an area of research, he envisioned it as a radical project (p. 101) in the context of social scientific work, one rooted in phenomenology. (Garfinkel was a student of Gurwitsch and Schütz.) Ethnomethodology focuses on performances in the real world, or, in its own terms, on naturally occurring, ordinary activities. This undertaking is not particularly novel; ordinary life has been examined and interpreted by many writers before Garfinkel. Ethnomethodology is unique, however, because it studies sense or meaning only...
- Heidegger, M. (1982). The basic problems of phenomenology (trans: Hofstadter, A.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
- Husserl, E. (1962). Ideas: general introduction to pure phenomenology (trans: Gibson, W. R. B.). London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and transcendental logic (trans: Cairns, D.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
- Husserl, E., & Landgrebe, L. (1973). Experience and judgment: Investigations in a genealogy of logic (trans: Churchill, J. S. & Ameriks, K). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar