This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
E.D. Adrian, The Physical Background of Perception (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967).
R.B. Angel, “The Geometry of Visibles,” Noûs 8(2) (1974): 87–117.
F. Atteneave, “Criteria for a Tenable Theory of Form Perception,” W. Wathen-Dunn (eds.), Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1967), pp. 56–67.
A.M. Battro, “Riemannian Geometries of Variable Curvature in Visual Space: Visual Alleys, Horopters, and Triangles in Big Open Fields,” Perception 5(1976): 9–23.
O. Becker, “Beiträge zur phänomenologischen Begründung der Geometrie und ihrer physikalischen Anwendung,” Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung IV (1923).
A. Berthoz, “Reference Frames for the Perception and Control of Movement,” in J. Paillard (ed.), Brain and Space (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).
A. Berthoz, Le sens du mouvement (Paris: Odile Jacob, 1996).
H. Blum, “Biological Shape and Visual Science,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 38 (1973): 205–287.
L. Boi, “Le concept de variété et la nouvelle géométrie de l’espace dans la pensée de Bernhard Riemann,” Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 134(45) (1995): 82–128.
L. Boi, “Les géométries non euclidiennes, le problème philosophique de l’espace et la conception transcendantale; de Helmholtz et Kant, les néo-kantiens, Einstein, Poincaré et Mach,” Kant-Studien 87(3) (1996): 257–289.
L. Boi, “The Concepts of Connection and Group in the Perception Process,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology (2004), forthcoimg.
L. Boi, Le problème mathématique de l’espace. Une quête de l’intelligible (Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995).
L. Boi, “The Role of Intuition and Formal Thinking in Kant, Husserl and in Modern Mathematics and Physics,” Mathesis (2004), forthcoming.
L. Boi, Géométrie et Phénoménologie de la Perception. Modèles mathématiques et interprétations philosophiques de la perception spatiale (Paris, 2004) (forthcoming).
L. Boi and L. Verner, “Sur quelques aspects phénoménologiques, géométriques et esthétiques de la perception et de la relation entre surface, forme et couleur,” VISIO, Special Issue “Cultural Cognition and Space Cognition” 6(2–3) (2001): 205–247.
E.G. Boring, “Visual Perception as Invariance,” Psychological Review 59 (1952): 141–148.
J. Bouveresse, Langage, perception et réalité, vol. 1 (Nîmes: J. Chambon, 1995).
F. Brentano, Untersuchungen zur Sinnespsychologie (Hamburg: Meiner, 1979), first edition, 1907.
F. Brentano, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, in O. Kraus (ed.) (English edition edited by L. L. McAlister, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973) (first German edition published in 1874).
L.E.J. Brouwer, “Consciousness, Philosophy, and Mathematics”, in Collected Works, vol. 1: Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1975).
L.E.J. Brouwer, “Über die Abbildung von Mannigfaltigkeiten,” Mathematische Annalen 71 (1911): 97–115.
V. Bruce, P. Green and M. Georgeson, Visual Perception. Physiology, Psychology, and Ecology, 3rd edn. (Sussex: Psychology Press, 1996).
E.H. Carlton and R.N. Shepard, “Psychologically Simple Motions as Geosedic Paths. I. Asymmetric Objects,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 34 (1990): 127–188.
É. Cartan, “La géométrie des groupes de transformations,” Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 6 (1927): 11–119.
E.C. Carterette and M.P. Friedman, Handbook of Perception, vol. III: Biology of Perceptual Systems (New York: Academic Press, 1974).
E. Cassirer, “The concept of Group and the Theory of Perception,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research IV (1944).
M. Cesa-Bianchi, A. Beretta and R. Luccio, La percezione (Milan: Franco Angeli Editore, 1977).
K.C. Chen, “A Group-Theoretic Analysis of Mental Space Isometries in Form Recognition,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 37(1993): 401–420.
U. Claesges, Edmund Husserls Theorie der Raumkonstitution (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964).
W.K. Clifford, Lectures and Essays, vol. I (London: Macmillan, 1879).
H. Conrad-Martius, “Zur Ontologie und Erscheinungslehre der realen Auβenwelt,” Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 3(1920): 345-396.
Da Silva, “Husserl’s Phenomenology and Weyl’s Predicativism,” Synthese 110(2) (1997): 277–296.
M. Delbrück, Mind from Matter? (Palo Alto, California: Blackwell Scientific Publishers, 1986).
Ch. Ehrenfels, “Über Gestaltqualitäten,” Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie XIV (1890): 249–292.
W. D. Ellis (ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967).
F. Enriques, “Sulla spiegazione psicologica dei postulati della geometria,” Rivista di Filosofia IV(3) (1901): 171–195.
D. F⊘llesdal, “Phenomenology,” in E.C. Carterette and M.P. Friedmann (eds.), Handbook of Perception (New York: Academic Press, 1974), pp. 377–386.
J.J. Gibson, The Perception of the Visual World (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1950).
J.J. Gibson, The Senses Considered as Perceptual System (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966).
R.L. Gregory, The Intelligent Eye (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1970).
R.L. Gregory, Eye and Brain. The Psychology of Seeing, 5th edn. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).
N.R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery, An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958).
C.W. Harvey, Husserl’s Phenomenology and the Foundations of Natural Science (Athens: Ohio University Press, 1989).
S. Helgason, Differential Geometry, Lie Groups and Symmetric Space (New York: Academic Press, 1978).
H. Helmholtz, Handbuch der physiologischen Optik, 3 vols. (Leipzig: J.A. Barth, 1867).
H. Helmholtz, Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, vol. II (Leipzig: J.A. Barth, 1883).
J.F. Herbart, Psychologie als Wissenschaft. Neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik (Königsberg, 1825).
E. Hering, Grundzüge der Lehre vom Lichtsinn (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1905).
D. Hilbert and S. Cohn-Vossen, Anschauliche Geometrie (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1932).
W.C. Hoffman, “The Lie Algebra of Visual Perception,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3 (1966): 65–98.
J. Hopking, “Visual Geometry,” The Philosophical Review 82(1) (1973): 3–34.
I.P. Howard, “Orientation and Motion in Space,” in Handbook of Perception, vol. III: Biology of Perceptual Systems (New York; Academic Press, 1974).
E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen, vols. I–III (Tü bingen: Max Niemeyer, 1980) (Logical Investigations, English edition translated by J. N. Findlay, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973).
E. Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy (translated by D. Carr, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1970).
E. Husserl, Formal and Transcendental Logic (translated by D. Cairns, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1969).
E. Husserl, Ding und Raum, Vorlesungen 1907 (herausgegeben von U. Claesges, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973) (english translation by R. Rojcewicz, Thing and Space – Lectures of 1907, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997).
E. Husserl, in I. Strohmeyer (ed.), Husserliana – Gesammelte Werke, vol. XXI: Studien zur Arithmetik und Geometrie (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1983), texts from 1886–1901.
E. Husserl, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology (translated by F. Kersten, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982).
E. Husserl, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology of Constitution. Second book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution (translated by R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989).
P. Hut, “Turning ‘The Hard Problem’ Upside Down and Sideways,’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 3(4) (1996): 313–329.
P. Hut, “Structuring Reality: The Role of Limits,” in J.L. Casti and A. Karlqvist (eds.), Boundaries and Barriers. On the Limits to Scientific Knowledge (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996), pp. 148–187.
M. Imbert, “La vision,” in Ch. Kayser (ed.), Traité de physiologie, tome II (Paris: Flammarion, 1976), pp. 1083–1191.
W. James, “The Perception of Space. (I) and (II),” Mind 45 (1887): 1–30; 47 (1887): 183–211.
W. James, The Principles of Psychology, vol. I (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).
G. Kanizsa, Organization in Vision (New York: Praeger, 1979).
I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781–1787) (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1990).
P. Kerszberg, “Of Exact and Inexact Essences in Modern Physical Science,” in L. Hardy and L. Embree (eds.), Phenomenology of Natural Science (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992).
S. Kobayashi, K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, vols. I and II (New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963).
K. Koffka, Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt, 1935).
W. Köhler, Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und in stationärem Zustand (Erlangen: Verlag der Philosophischen Akademie, 1924).
W. Köhler, Gestalt Phychology (New York: H. Liveright, 1929).
D. Lohmar, Phänomenologie der Mathematik, in Phænomenologica (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989).
G. Longo, “The Mathematical Continuum: From Intuition to Logic,” (Paris: Ecole Normale Supérieure), Preprint, LIENS 97/12, pp. 3–29.
Z.K. Lorenz, The Role of Gestalt Perception in Animal and Human Behaviour, in L.L. Whyte (ed.), Aspects of Form (New York: Elsevier Publishing Company, 1968).
E. Mach, Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung (Leipzig: J.A. Barth, 1906).
K. Mulligan, “Perception,” in B. Smith and D.W. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 168–238.
F. Nef, L’objet quleconque (Paris: Vrin, 1998).
N. O’Connor and B. Hermelin, Seeing and Hearing and Space and Time (London: Academic Press, 1978).
J. Paillard, “Motor and Representational Framing of Space,” in J. Paillard (ed.), Brain and Space (Oxford; Oxford University Press, 1991).
S.E. Palmer, “The Role of Symmetry in Shape Perception,” Acta Psychologica 59 (1985): 67–90.
S.E. Palmer, “Modern Theories of Gestalt Perception,” in G.W. Humphreys (ed.), Understanding vision (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).
R. Penrose, The Emperor’s New Mind. Concerning Computers, Minds, and The Laws of Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).
C.S. Peskin, Lectures on Mathematical Aspects of Physiology, in F.C. Hoppensteadt (ed.), Lectures in Applied Mathematics, vol. 19 (Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 1981).
J. Petitot, “Structuralisme et phénoménologie,” in J. Petitot (ed.), Logos et Théorie des Catastrophes, Actes du Colloque de Cerisy en l’honneur de René Thom (Genève: Ed. Patiño, 1989), pp. 345–376.
J. Petitot, “Le physique, le morphologique, le symbolique: remarques sur la vision,” Revue de Synthèse (1–2) (1990): 139–183.
J. Petitot, Physique du Sens, Editions du CNRS, Paris, 1992.
H. Poincaré, “L’espace et la géométrie,” in La Science et l’Hypothèse, Flammarion, Paris, 1902.
H. Poincaré, “The Foundation of Geometry,” The Monist IX(1) (1898): 1–43.
L.S. Pontryagin, Topological Groups (first Russian edition, 1938, New York: Gordon & Breach, 1966).
N. Rashevsky, “Physico-Mathematical Aspects of the Gestalt Problem,” Philosophy of Science 1 (1934): 409–419.
Reinhardt-Rutland, A.H., “Perceiving the orientation-in-depth of triangular surfaces: static-monocular, moving-monocular, and static-binocular viewing”, The Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 123, No. 1, 1996, pp. 19–28.
W. Richards, “Visual Space Perception,” in E.C. Cartarette and M.P. Friedman (eds.), Handbook of Perception, vol. V: Seeing (New York: Academic Press, 1975), pp. 351–386.
B. Riemann, in R. Narasimhan (ed.), Gesammelte mathematische Werke, wissenschaftlicher Nachlaβ und Nachträge/Collected Papers (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990).
I. Rock, Orientation and Form (New York: Academic Press, 1973).
D. Rolfsen, Knots and Links (Berkeley, CA: Publish or Perish Press, 1979).
W. Schapp, Beiträge zur Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung (Wiesbaden: Heymann, 1976).
R.N. Schepard, “The Circumplex and Related Topological Manifolds in the Study of Perception,” in S. Shye (ed.), Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978).
E. Schrödinger, “Grundlinien einer Theorie der Farbenmetrik im Tagessehen” (1920), in Gesammelte Abhandlungen, vol. 4 (Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1984).
A.V. Shubnikov and V.A. Koptsik, Symmetry in Science and Art (New York: Plenum Press, 1974).
C. Sinigaglia, La seduzione dello spazio, Geometria e filosofia nel primo Husserl (Milan: Edizioni Unicopli, 2000).
B. Smith and D.W. Smith, “Introduction,” in B. Smith and D.W. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 1–44.
G. Sperling, “Mathematical Models of Binocular Vision,” in S. Grossberg (ed.), Mathematical Psychology and Psychophysiology, SIAM/AMS Proceedings, vol. 13 (Providence: American Mathematical Society, 1981).
N. Steenrod, The Topology of Fibre Bundles (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1951).
C. Stumpf, Erekenntnislehre, vol. 1 (Leipzig: Verlag von J.A. Barth, 1939).
C. Stumpf, Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung (Leipzig, 1873).
P. Suppes, “Is Visual Space Euclidean?,” Synthese 35 (1977): 397–421.
R. Thom, Apologie du logos (Paris: Hachette, 1990).
R. Thom, Esquisse d’une Sémiophysique (Paris: InterEditions, 1991).
D’Arcy Thompson, On Growth and Form (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1917).
W.R. Uttal, Visual Form Detection in 3-Dimensional Space (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983).
M. Wagner, “The Metric of Visual Space,” Perception and Psychophysics 38(6) (1985): 483–495.
R. Walk and H. L. Pick Jr. (eds.), Intersensory Perception and Sensory Integration (New York: Plenum Press, 1981).
M. Wertheimer, “Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II,” Psychologische Forschung 4 (1923): 301–350.
H. Weyl, Das Kontinuum. Kritische Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Analysis (Leipzig: Veit, 1918) (The Continuum. A Critical Examination of the Foundation of Analysis (english edition translated by S. Pollard and Th. Bole, Kirksville, Missouri: The Thomas Jefferson University Press, 1987), Dover edition, 1994.
H. Weyl, Mathematische Analyse des Raumproblems (Berlin: Springer, 1923).
H. Weyl, Mind and Nature (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1934).
H. Weyl, Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949).
H. Weyl, Symmetry (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952).
F.R.S. Zeeman, “Brain Modeling,” in Structural Stability, The Theory of Catastrophes, and Applications in the Sciences 525 (1976): 367–372.
S. Zeki, A Vision of the Brain (London: Blackwell Scientific Publishers, 1993).
D.W. Zimmerman, “Could Extended Objects be Made Out of Simple Parts? An Argument for ‘Atomless Gunk’,” Philosophy and Phenomenology Research 56(1) (1996): 1–29.
L. Zusne, Visual Perception of Form (New York: Academic Press, 1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boi, L. Questions Regarding Husserlian Geometry and Phenomenology. A Study of the Concept of Manifold and Spatial Perception. Husserl Stud 20, 207–267 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-004-2061-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-004-2061-z