Advertisement

Semi-parametric regression as a tool for assessing moderation: an analysis of the Fast Track intervention

  • E. Michael Foster
  • Stephanie Watkins
Article

Abstract

When assessing the impact of a family or youth intervention, program evaluators often consider whether and how baseline characteristics moderate the effect of treatment. Parametric and non-parametric approaches are both possible, but each has limitations. In this article, we argue for and illustrate the use of semi-parametric methods. A hybrid of parametric and non-parametric approaches, semi-parametric modeling techniques combine the strengths of each approach. This article demonstrates how this approach can be used to evaluate whether an intervention effect was larger for those with most serious problems at baseline. Using data from the Fast Track project—a comprehensive intervention designed to prevent serious conduct problems among children at high risk—we investigated the moderating effect of two key baseline characteristics: parent-reported and teacher-reported problem behavior. Our analyses do not demonstrate a significant moderation of the intervention effect.

Keywords

Fast Track Moderation Semi-parametric Differencing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grants R18 MH48043, R18 MH50951, R18 MH50952, and R18 MH50953. The Center for Substance Abuse Prevention and the National Institute on Drug Abuse also has provided support for Fast Track through a memorandum of agreement with the NIMH. This work was also supported in part by Department of Education grant S184U30002 and NIMH grants K05MH00797 and K05MH01027. The economic analysis of the Fast Track project is supported through R01MH62988. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute On Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. Aday, L.A., Andersen, R.: A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Serv. Res. 9(3), 208 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aday, L.A., Begley, C.E., Lairson, D.R., Slater, C.H., Richard, A.J., Montoya, I.D.: A framework for assessing the effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of behavioral healthcare. Am. J. Manag. Care. Jun 25;5 Spec no: SP25-44 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. Aos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, J., Miller, M., Pennucci, A.: Benefits and Costs of Prevention and Early Intervention Programs for Youth. Washington State Public Policy Institute, Seattle (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Arellano, M.: Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51(6), 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamberlain, P., Reid, J.B.: Parent observation and report of child symptoms. Behav. Assess. 9, 97–109 (1987)Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, M.A.: The monetary value of saving a high-risk youth. J. Quant. Criminol. 14, 5–33 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group: A developmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorders: the Fast Track Program. Dev. Psychopathol. 4, 509–527 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group: Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 67(5), 631–647 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group: Fast track randomized controlled trial to prevent externalizing psychiatric disorders: findings from grades 3 to 9. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 46(10), 1250–1262 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawson-McClure, S., Sandler, I., Wolchik, S., Millsap, R.: Risk as a moderator of the effects of prevention programs for children from divorced families: a six-year longitudinal study. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 32(2), 175–190 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Deater-Deckard, K.: Physical discipline among African American and European American mothers: links to children. Dev. Psychol. 32(6), 1065–1072 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dishion, T.J., Dodge, K.A.: Peer contagion in interventions for children and adolescents: moving towards an understanding of the ecology and dynamics of change. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 33(3), 395–400 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Durrleman, S., Simon, R.: Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat. Med. 8(5), 551–561 (1989)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster, E.M., Jones, D., Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group: Can a costly intervention be cost-effective?: an analysis of violence prevention. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 63, 1284–1291 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Foster, E.M., Jensen, P.S., Schlander, M., et al.: Treatment for ADHD: is more complex treatment cost-effective for more complex cases? Health Serv. Res. 42(1 Pt 1), 165–182 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fox, J.: Multiple and Generalized Nonparametric Regression. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2000)Google Scholar
  18. Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  19. Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2008)Google Scholar
  20. Greenland, S., Pearl, J., Robins, J.M.: Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 10(1), 37–48 (1999)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grossman, M.: The human capital model. In: Culyer, A.J., Newhouse, J.P. (eds.) Handbook of Health Economics, vol. 1, pp. 347–405. Elsevier, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  22. Jacobson, L.: The family as a producer of health—an extended Grossman model. J. Health Econ. 19, 611–637 (2000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacoby, W.G.: Loess: a nonparametric, graphical tool for depicting relationships between variables. Elect. Stud. 19(4), 577–613 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kraemer, H.C., Wilson, G.T., Fairburn, C.G., Agras, W.S.: Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 59(10), 877–883 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kusche, C., Greenberg, M.: The PATHS Curriculum. Developmental Research and Programs, Seattle (1993)Google Scholar
  26. Li, Q., Racine, J.S.: Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)Google Scholar
  27. Morgan, S.L., Winship, C.: Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  28. Moyé, L.A.: Multiple Analyses in Clinical Trials: Fundamentals for Investigators. Springer, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  29. Murray, D.M., Varnell, S.P., Blitstein, J.L.: Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am. J. Public Health 94(3), 423–432 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Owens, E.J., Hinshaw, S.P., Kraemer, H.C., et al.: Which treatment for whom for ADHD? Moderators of treatment response in the MTA. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 71(3), 540–552 (2003)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (2007)Google Scholar
  33. Sandler, I.N., Ayers, T.S., Wolchik, S.A., et al.: The Family Bereavement Program: efficacy evaluation of a theory-based prevention program for parentally bereaved children and adolescents. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 71(3), 587–600 (2003)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaffer, D., Fisher, P., Dulcan, M.K., et al.: The NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA study. Methods for the epidemiology of child and adolescent mental disorders study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 35(7), 865–877 (1996)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Spieker, S.J., Larson, N.C., Lewis, S.M., Keller, T.E., Gilchrist, L.: Developmental trajectories of disruptive behavior problems in preschool children of adolescent mothers. Child Dev. 70(2), 443–458 (1999)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Werthamer-Larsson, L., Kellam, S.: Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation-revised (TOCA-R). In Prevention Center Training Manual. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (1989)Google Scholar
  37. Wood, S.: Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R. Chapman & Hall, London (2006)Google Scholar
  38. Wood, S., Wood, M.S.: The mgcv Package (2007). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mgcv/mgcv.pdf
  39. Yatchew, A.: An Elementary Estimator of the Partial Linear Model. Econ. Lett. 57(2), 135–143 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yatchew, A.: Nonparametric regression techniques in economics. J. Econ. Lit. 36(2), 669–721 (1998)Google Scholar
  41. Yatchew, A.: Semiparametric Regression for the Applied Econometrician. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations