Selection Bias into Health Plans with Specific Characteristics: A Case Study of Endogeneity of Gatekeeper Requirements and Mammography Utilization
- 63 Downloads
We investigated the issue of selection bias in a case study of mammography utilization using a potentially endogenous predictor, the presence of gatekeeper requirements in an individual's health plan. Data from the 2000 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and the linked 1998/1999 National Health Interview Survey were used. We employed and compared results from an extensive list of estimation methods: single equation estimations including standard probit and linear probability models, two-stage instrumental variables (IV), and bivariate probit models. Specification tests were used to inspect the relevance and validity of candidates for instrumental variables. Given the best instruments available to us, we did not find evidence that correcting for selection bias improved the estimates. Standard single equation estimations remained the preferred approach in our study.
Keywordsselection bias health insurance mammography gatekeeping
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J.G., Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
- 8.Godfrey, L.G., Misspecification tests in econometrics: The lagrange multiplier principle and other approaches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
- 12.Klepinger, D., Lundberg, S., and Plotnick, R., “Instrument selection: The case of teenage childbearing and women's educational attainment,” Unpublished manuscript, 1995.Google Scholar
- 15.National Conference of State Legislatures, Women's Health: State laws affecting breast cancer. 2000. http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/cancer.htm, Assessed 9/27/2004.
- 17.Office of Program and Policy Information, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, N.C.f.C.D. Prevention, and Health Promotion, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, State Laws Relating to Breast Cancer: Legislative Summary January 1949 to May 2000. Atlanta Georgia, 2000.Google Scholar
- 23.US Department of Health and Human Services, Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 3rd Edition: Periodic Updates, 2002.Google Scholar