Embracing Mystery: Radiation Risks and Popular Science Writing in the Early Cold War

Abstract

Narrative form is crucial to the understanding of science in popular culture. This is particularly true with subjects such as radiation, in which the technical details at hand are often remote from everyday experience—as well as contested or uncertain among experts. This article examines the narrative choices made by three popular texts that publicized radiation risks to the public during the Cold War: John Hersey's Hiroshima, David Bradley's No Place to Hide, and Ralph Lapp's The Voyage of the Lucky Dragon. It contends that each author borrowed from well-established literary genres and that this borrowing was crucial to coherence and effective messaging of the argument. At the same time, placing the arguments in such a familiar form served to blunt some of the radical potential in those same messages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The book jacket for No Place to Hide concludes with the assertion that “just as John Hersey’s HIROSHIMA made the fate of that city clear to millions of readers, so NO PLACE TO HIDE interprets these controlled explosions in terms of the whole world.”

References

  1. Aldrich, Robert, director. (1955) 2001. Kiss Me Deadly. Santa Monica: MGM Home Entertainment.

  2. Beer, Gillian. (1983) 2009. Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot, and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  3. Boyer, Paul. 1985. By the Bomb’s Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley, David. 1948. No Place to Hide. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campos, Luis A. 2015. Radium and the Secret of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Choi, Tina Young, and Leckie, Barbara. 2018. Slow Causality: The Function of Narrative in an Age of Climate Change. Victorian Studies 60(4): 565–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Divine, Robert A. 1978. Blowing on the Wind: The Nuclear Test Ban Debate, 1954–1960. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forde, Kathy Roberts. 2011. Profit and Public Interest: A Publication History of John Hersey’s "Hiroshima.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 88(3): 562–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frank, Lawrence. 2003. Victorian Detective Fiction and the Nature of Evidence: The Scientific Investigations of Poe, Dickens, and Doyle. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gormley, Melinda. 2016. Pulp Science: Education and Communication in the Paperback Book Revolution. Endeavour 40(1): 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hacker, Barton C. 1994. Elements of Controversy: The Atomic Energy Commission and Radiation Safety in Nuclear Weapons Testing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hersey, John. (1946) 1985. Hiroshima. Toronto: Bantam Books.

  13. Homei, Aya. 2013. The Contentious Death of Mr. Kuboyama: Science as Politics in the 1954 Lucky Dragon Incident. Japan Forum 25(2): 212–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirby, David A. 2013. Forensic Fictions: Science, Television Production, and Modern Storytelling. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44(1): 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kramish, Arnold. 1958. Review of The Voyage of the Lucky DragonScience 127(3302): 808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lapp, Ralph E. 1958. The Voyage of the Lucky Dragon. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lavine, Matthew. 2013. The First Atomic Age: Scientists, Radiation and the American Public, 1895–1945. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laurence, William L. 1948. The Fearful Portent of Bikini: Our A-Bomb Tests Posed a Dilemma that Cannot Be Solved too Quickly. New York Times, 28 November, BR 1, 36.

  19. Masco, Joseph. 2015. The Age of Fallout. History of the Present 5(2): 137–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McCarthy, Mary. 1946. The Hiroshima “New Yorker.” Politics. November: 367.

  21. Newell, Dianne, Lamont, Victoria. 2005. Rugged Domesticity: Frontier Mythology in Post-Armageddon Science Fiction by Women. Science Fiction Studies 32(3): 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. North, Sterling. 1948. The Atom Just Kissed Hiroshima. Washington Post, 5 December: B4.

  24. Oreskes, Naomi. 1996. Objectivity or Heroism: On the Invisibility of Women in Science. Osiris 11: 87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Secord, James A. 2000. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Secord, James A. 2004. Knowledge in Transit. Isis 95(4): 654–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sethi, Megan Barnhart. 2012. Information, Education, and Indoctrination: The Federation of American Scientists and Public Communication Strategies in the Atomic Age. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 42(1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharp, Patrick B. 2004. From Yellow Peril to Japanese Wasteland: John Hersey’s "Hiroshima.” Twentieth Century Literature 46(4): 434–452.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas, Ronald R. 1999. Detective Fiction and the Rise of Forensic Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Unna, Warren. 1958. Review of The Voyage of the Lucky Dragon. Washington Post, 23 February: E6.

  31. Wallace, Molly. 2016. Risk Criticism: Precautionary Reading in an Age of Environmental Uncertainty. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weart, Spencer R. 1988. Nuclear Fear: A History of Images. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yavenditti, Michael J. 1974. John Hersey and the American Conscience: The Reception of "Hiroshima.” Pacific Historical Review 43(1): 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Jacob Darwin Hamblin for the invitation to submit this piece, as well as for advice and suggestions on the article itself—along with Karen A. Rader, Linda M. Richards, Marsha Richmond, and two anonymous referees whose feedback greatly improved it.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David K. Hecht.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hecht, D.K. Embracing Mystery: Radiation Risks and Popular Science Writing in the Early Cold War. J Hist Biol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-021-09629-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Radiation
  • Nuclear
  • Risk
  • Narrative
  • Popular culture