Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 255–282 | Cite as

Vitalism and the Resistance to Experimentation on Life in the Eighteenth Century

  • Charles T. Wolfe
Article
  • 440 Downloads

Abstract

There is a familiar opposition between a ‘Scientific Revolution’ ethos and practice of experimentation, including experimentation on life, and a ‘vitalist’ reaction to this outlook. The former is often allied with different forms of mechanism – if all of Nature obeys mechanical laws, including living bodies, ‘iatromechanism’ should encounter no obstructions in investigating the particularities of animal-machines – or with more chimiatric theories of life and matter, as in the ‘Oxford Physiologists’. The latter reaction also comes in different, perhaps irreducibly heterogeneous forms, ranging from metaphysical and ethical objections to the destruction of life, as in Margaret Cavendish, to more epistemological objections against the usage of instruments, the ‘anatomical’ outlook and experimentation, e.g. in Locke and Sydenham. But I will mainly focus on a third anti-interventionist argument, which I call ‘vitalist’ since it is often articulated in the writings of the so-called Montpellier Vitalists, including their medical articles for the Encyclopédie. The vitalist argument against experimentation on life is subtly different from the metaphysical, ethical and epistemological arguments, although at times it may borrow from any of them. It expresses a Hippocratic sensibility – understood as an artifact of early modernity, not as some atemporal trait of medical thought – in which Life resists the experimenter, or conversely, for the experimenter to grasp something about Life, it will have to be without torturing or radically intervening in it. I suggest that this view does not have to imply that Nature is something mysterious or sacred; nor does the vitalist have to attack experimentation on life in the name of some ‘vital force’ – which makes it less surprising to find a vivisectionist like Claude Bernard sounding so close to the vitalists.

Keywords

Vitalism Experiment Holism Ménuret de Chambaud Enlightenment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aït-Touati, Frédérique. 2011. Fictions of the Cosmos. Science and Literature in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bacon, Francis. 1857–1874. James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath (eds.), The Works of Francis Bacon, 14 vols. London: Longman & Co.Google Scholar
  3. Barthez, Paul-Joseph. 1806. Nouveaux éléments de la science de l’homme, 2nd revised edition, 2 vols. (1st edition 1778). Paris: Goujon & Brunot.Google Scholar
  4. Barthez, Paul-Joseph 1858. Nouveaux éléments de la science de l’homme, 3rd revised and expanded edition, 2 vols. Paris: Germer Baillière.Google Scholar
  5. Bastholm, Eyvind. 1950. The History of Muscle Physiology from the Natural Philosophers to Albrecht von Haller (Acta Historica Scientiarum Naturalium et Medicinalium, vol. VII). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, Claude. 1865. Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris: J.B. Baillière & Fils.Google Scholar
  7. Bernard, Claude 1869. Histoire de l’expérimentation physiologique – l’art d’expérimenter sur les êtres vivants. Revue des cours scientifiques de la France et de l’étranger, 6e année. Paris: Germer Baillière, pp. 194–200.Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, Claude 1879. Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux, tome II. Paris: Germer Baillière.Google Scholar
  9. Bloch, Oscar, and Wartburg, Walther von. 1954. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue française. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
  10. Bordeu, Théophile de. 1751. Recherches anatomiques sur la position des glandes et leur action. Paris: Quillau père.Google Scholar
  11. Bordeu, Théophile de 1764. Recherches sur quelques points d’histoire de la médecine. Paris: Cailleau.Google Scholar
  12. Bordeu, Théophile de 1818. Œuvres complètes, précédées d’une Notice sur sa vie et ses ouvrages par Monsieur le Chevalier de Richerand, 2 vols. Paris: Caille et Ravier.Google Scholar
  13. Bordeu, Théophile de 1977–1979. Martha Fletcher, w. Nadine Labbé, and Aloys de Laforcade (eds.), Correspondance, 4 vols. Montpellier: CNRS/Université Paul-Valéry, Groupe de recherche sur les Textes Modernes.Google Scholar
  14. Boury, Dominique. 2004. La philosophie médicale de Théophile de Bordeu (1722–1776). Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
  15. Brockliss, Laurence, and Jones, Colin. 1997. The Medical World of Early Modern France. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Canguilhem, Georges. 1983. Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences, 5th Revised Edition. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  17. Cavendish, Margaret. 1656. Natures Pictures Drawn by Fancies Pencil to the Life. London: J. Martin and J. Allestrye.Google Scholar
  18. Cavendish, Margaret 1666. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. London: A. Maxwell.Google Scholar
  19. Chamayou, Grégoire. 2008. Les corps vils: Expérimenter sur les êtres humains aux XVIII e et XIX e siècles. Paris: Les Empêcheurs de Penser en Rond/La Découverte.Google Scholar
  20. Coleman, William. 1985. The Cognitive Basis of the Discipline: Claude Bernard on Physiology.Isis 76: 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cunningham, Andrew. 2002. The Pen and the Sword: Recovering the Disciplinary Identity of Physiology and Anatomy Before 1800, I: Old Physiology—The Pen. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33(4): 631–665Google Scholar
  22. Daston, Lorraine. 2004. Attention and the Values of Nature in the Enlightenment. Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal (eds.), The Moral Authority of Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 100–126.Google Scholar
  23. Daston, Lorraine. 2011. The Empire of Observation, 1600–1800.Lorraine Daston and Elizabeth Lunbeck (eds.), Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 81–113.Google Scholar
  24. de La Caze, Louis. 1755. Idée de i’homme physique et moral pour servir d’introduction á un traité de médecine. Paris: Guérin & DelatourGoogle Scholar
  25. Dear, Peter. 2006. The Meanings of Experience. Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 106–131.Google Scholar
  26. Descartes, René. 1964–1976. C. Adam and P. Tannery (eds.), Œuvres, 11 vols. Paris: Vrin (cited as AT followed by volume and page number).Google Scholar
  27. Diderot, Denis. 1975–. H. Dieckmann, J. Proust, and J. Varloot (eds.), Œuvres complètes. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
  28. Diderot, Denis and D’Alembert, Jean le Rond (eds.). 1765. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers… Paris: Briasson. Online at University of Chicago, ARTFL Encyclopédie Projet, ed. Robert Morrissey, http://encyclopedie.uchicago.edu/ (Enc.).
  29. Duchesneau, François. 1982. La physiologie des Lumières. Empirisme, modéles et théories. The Hague: Martinus NijhoffGoogle Scholar
  30. Giglioni, Guido. 2008. What Ever Happened to Francis Glisson? Albrecht Haller and the Fate of Eighteenth-Century Irritability. Science in Contest 21: 465–493Google Scholar
  31. Gilad, David. 2010. The Epistemology of Light and Colors in Goethe’s era Germany. PhD, University of Sydney, Unit for the History and Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
  32. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. 1988. Scientific Studies. Douglas Miller (ed. & trans.), The Collected Works, vol. 12. New York: Suhrkamp/Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Guerrini, Anita. 1989. The Ethics of Animal Experimentation in Seventeenth-Century England.Journal of The History of Ideas 50(3): 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haller, Albrecht von. 1755. A Dissertation on the Sensible and Irritable Parts of Animals. London: J. Nourse.Google Scholar
  36. Haller, Albrecht von 1778. Oeconomie Animale. Encyclopédie ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, nouvelle édition, vol. 23. Geneva: Pellet, pp. 427a–429b.Google Scholar
  37. Kant, Immanuel. 1987. W. Pluhar (trans.), Critique of Judgment. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  38. Kass, Leon. 1999. The Hungry Soul: Eating and the Perfecting of Our Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lavabre-Bertrand, Thierry. 1992. La philosophie médicale de l’école de Montpellier au XIX e siècle. Thèse de doctorat. Paris: école Pratique des Hautes études, IVe Section.Google Scholar
  40. Legallois, Julien Jean César. 1812. Expériences sur le principe de vie. Paris: d’Hautel.Google Scholar
  41. Lordat, Jacques. 1813. Conseils sur la manière d’étudier la physiologie de l’homme. Montpellier: Delmas.Google Scholar
  42. Lower, Richard. 1932. Tractatus de Corde [London, 1669]. K.J. Franklin (trans.), in R.T. Gunther, Early Science in Oxford, vol. IX. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Maehle, Andreas H., and Tröhler, Ulrich. 1987. Animal Experimentation from Antiquity to the End of the Eighteenth Century: Attitudes and Arguments.Nicolaas A. Rupke (ed.), Vivisection in Historical Perspective. London: Croom Helm, pp. 14–47.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, Julian. 1990. Sauvages’ Nosology. Medical Enlightenment in Montpellier. Andrew Cunningham and Roger French (eds.), The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–138.Google Scholar
  45. Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  46. Métraux, Alexandre. 2004. 1064332 atomes et un cercle de vie.Multitudes 16: 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pesic, Peter. 1999. Wrestling with Proteus: Francis Bacon and the ‘Torture’ of Nature.Isis 90: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raven, C.E. 1942. John Ray Naturalist: His Life and Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rey, Roselyne. 1997. L’âme, le corps et le vivant. Mirko Grmek (ed.), Histoire de la pensée médicale en Occident, vol. 2: De la Renaissance aux Lumières. Paris: Seuil, pp. 117–156.Google Scholar
  50. 2000. Naissance et développement du vitalisme en France de la deuxième moitié du 18 e siècle à la fin du Premier Empire. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
  51. Riolan, Jean. 1628. Les œuvres anatomiques de Jean Riolan, vol. 1. Paris: Denys Moreau.Google Scholar
  52. Roederer, Johann Georg. 1765 (orig. 1753). Elemens de l’Art des Accouchemens: Augmentes des Observations sur les Accouchemens Laborieux, a l’Usage des Etudians en Medecine et en Chirurgie. Paris: Didot Le Jeune.Google Scholar
  53. Salomon-Bayet, Claire. 1978. L’institution de la science et l’expérience du vivant: méthode et expérience à l’Académie Royale des Sciences, 1666–1793. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  54. Salter, Alan. 2010. William Harvey. A Study in Empiricism. PhD, University of Sydney, Unit for History and Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
  55. Salter, Alan, and Wolfe, Charles T. 2009. Empiricism Contra Experiment: Harvey, Locke and the Revisionist View of Experimental Philosophy.Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire et d’épistémologie des Sciences de la Vie 16(2): 113–140.Google Scholar
  56. Sarasohn, Lisa T. 1984. A Science Turned Upside Down: Feminism and the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish.Huntington Library Quarterly 47(4): 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sarasohn, Lisa T 2010. The Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish: Reason and Fancy During the Scientific Revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Schiller, Joseph. 1978. La notion d’organisation dans l’histoire de la biologie. Paris:Maloine.Google Scholar
  59. Semler, Liam E. 2010. The Man:Beasts Debate in Margaret Cavendish’s Early Works. Paper Presented at the ‘Rise of Empiricism’ Conference, University of Sydney, Department of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  60. Singy, Patrick. 2006. Huber’s Eyes: The Art of Scientific Observation Before the Emergence of Positivism.Representations 95: 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Staden, Heinrich von. 1975. Experiment and Experience in Hellenistic Medicine.Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 22: 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Steinke, Hubert. 2001. Haller’s Concepts of Irritability and Sensibility and Their Reception in France. Mariana Saad (ed.), Mécanisme et vitalisme. La lettre de la Maison française d’Oxford, vol. 14, pp. 37–69.Google Scholar
  63. Steinke, Hubert 2005. Irritating Concepts: Haller’s Concept and the European Controversy on Irritability and Sensibility, 1750–1790. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  64. Vicq d’Azyr, Félix. 1786. Traité d’anatomie et de physiologie avec des planches coloriées représentant au naturel les divers organes de l’Homme et des Animaux, 2 vols. Paris: Didot l’aîné.Google Scholar
  65. Vicq d’Azyr, Félix. an XIII. [1805]. Plan d’un cours d’anatomie et de physiologie. Moreau de la Sarthe (ed.), Œuvres, vol. 4. Paris: L. Duprat-Duverger.Google Scholar
  66. Vila, Anne C. 1998. Enlightenment and Pathology. Sensibility in the Literature and Medicine of Eighteenth-Century France. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Walmsley, J.C. 2008. Sydenham and the Development of Locke’s Natural Philosophy.British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16(1): 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Webster, Charles. 1969. Henry More and Descartes: Some New Sources.British Journal for the History of Science 4(16): 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wellman, Kathleen. 2003. Materialism and Vitalism. J.L. Heilbron (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed at Oxford Reference Online. July 1 2012 http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t124.e0443.
  70. Whytt, Robert. 1755. Observations on the Sensibility and Irritability of the Parts of Man and Other Animals: Occasioned by Dr. Haller’s late Treatise on these Subjects. Physiological Essays. Edinburgh: Hamilton, Balfour & Neill.Google Scholar
  71. Whytt, Robert 1759. Thébault (trans.), Essais physiologiques, contenant: I. des Recherches sur les causes du mouvement des fluides dans les très petits vaisseaux des animaux; II. des Observations sur la sensibilité et sur l’irritabilité des parties du corps animal à l’occasion du Mémoire de M. Haller sur ce sujet. Paris: les frères Estienne.Google Scholar
  72. Williams, Elizabeth A. 2003. A Cultural History of Medical Vitalism in Enlightenment Montpellier. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  73. Williams, Elizabeth A 2008. Of Two Lives One? Jean–Charles–Marguerite Guillaume Grimaud and the Question of Holism in Vitalist Medicine.Science in Context 21(4): 593–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wolfe, Charles T. 2009. Cabinet d’Histoire Naturelle’, or: The Interplay of Nature and Artifice in Diderot’s Naturalism.Perspectives on Science 17(1): 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wolfe, Charles T 2011. From Substantival to Functional Vitalism and Beyond, or from Stahlian Animas to Canguilhemian Attitudes.Eidos 14: 212–235.Google Scholar
  76. Wolfe, Charles T 2012. Forms of Materialist Embodiment.Matthew Landers and Brian Muñoz (eds.), Bodies of Knowledge: Anatomy, Complexity and the Invention of Organizational Systems, 1500–1850. London: Pickering and Chatto, pp. 129–144.Google Scholar
  77. Wolfe, Charles T 2013 On the Role of Newtonian Analogies in Eighteenth-Century Life Science: Vitalism and Provisionally Inexplicable Explicative Devices. Zvi Biener and Eric Schliesser (eds.), Newton and Empiricism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Wolfe, Charles T., and Gal, Ofer (eds.). 2010. The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge. Embodied Empiricism in Early Modern Science. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  79. Wolfe, Charles T., and Terada, Motoichi. 2008. The Animal Economy as Object and Program in Montpellier Vitalism.Science in Context 21(4): 537–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for History of Science, Department of Philosophy and Moral SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations