Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Questions of Methodology in Aristotle’s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the Middle Ages Aristotle’s treatises were accessible to intellectuals via translations and commentaries. Among his works on natural philosophy, the zoological books received relatively little scholarly attention, though several medieval commentators carefully studied Aristotle’s investigations of the animal kingdom. Averroes completed in 1169 a commentary on an Arabic translation of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals and Generation of Animals. In 1323 Gersonides completed his supercommentary on a Hebrew translation of Averroes’ commentary. This article examines how these two medieval commentators interpret the first book of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals, at the center of which stand methodological questions regarding the study of animals. Aristotle’s discussion of classification is presented by Averroes and Gersonides in light of an epistemological debate concerning the requisite method for scientific inquiries and discoveries. Sense perception is contrasted with rational reasoning, and ultimately a combined method is proposed, sense perception maintaining supremacy. These commentators outline a clear link between the systematic arrangement of animal species as offered by Aristotle, and his subsequent logical demonstrations which, according to them, form the core of biological investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. 1971. Generation of Animals: The Arabic Translation Commonly Ascribed to Yaḥyā ibn al-Biṭrīq (Edited with Introduction and Glossary by J. Brugman and H. J. Drossaart Lulofs). Leiden: E.J. Brill.

  • Aristotle. 1978a. Aristotle’s De motu animalium (Text with Translation, Commentary, and Interpretive Essays by Martha C. Nussbaum). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Aristotle. 1978b. The Arabic Version of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals Book XI-XIV of the Kitāb al-Hayawān (A Critical Edition with Introduction and Selected Glossary by Remke Kruk). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.

  • Aristotle. 2001. On the Parts of Animals I-IV (Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by James G. Lennox). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Averroes. Commentary on the Book of Animals (=C. BA). MS. Paris – Bibliotheque Nationale héb. 956/9 [IMHM #32606].

  • [Averroes] Ibn Rushd. 1984. Metaphysics (A Translation with Introduction of Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Book Lām by Charles Genequand). Leiden: E.J. Brill.

  • Balme, David M. 1962. “Genos and Eidos in Aristotle’s Biology.” The Classical Quarterlys, New Series 12(1): 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balme, David M. 1987. “The Place of Biology in Aristotle’s Philosophy.” Gotthelf Allan and James G. Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–20.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Gerrit and Fontaine, Resianne. 1999. “Medico-philosophical Controversies in Nathan b. Yo’el Falaquera’s ‘Sefer Ṣori ha-Guf’.” Jewish Quarterly Review 90(1–2): 27–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coope, Ursula. 2005. Time for Aristotle: Physics IV. 10–14. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, Noah J. 2007. Judaism and Science: A Historical Introduction. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, Resianne. 1994a. “Aristotle vs. Galen in the Zoological Part of R. Judah ben Solomon’s Midrash Ha-Hochma.” Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of Jewish Studies 2: 41–46.

  • Fontaine, Resianne. 1994b. “The Facts of Life: The Nature of the Female Contribution to Generation According to Judah ha-Cohen’s Midrash Ha-Hokhmah and Contemporary Texts.” Medizinhistorisches Journal 29: 333–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, Gad. 1989. “Human Felicity and Astronomy in Gersonides’ Revolt Against Ptolemy” [Hebrew]. Da‘at 22: 55–72.

  • Freudenthal, Gad. 2002. “The Medieval Astrologization of Aristotle’s Biology: Averroes on the Role of the Celestial Bodies in the Generation of Animate Beings.” Arabic Science and Philosophy 12: 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaziel, Ahuva. 2008. The Biology of Levi ben Gershom (Gersonides) [Hebrew]. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan.

  • Gersonides. Supercommentary on the Book of Animals (=SC. BA). MS. Vatican – Urbinati ebr. 42 [IMHM #681].

  • Gersonides. 1998. Commentary on Song of Songs (Translated from the Hebrew with an Introduction and Annotations by Menachem Kellner). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Goldstein, Bernard R. 1972. “Theory and Observation in Medieval Astronomy.” Isis 63: 39–47. Reprinted in: Bernard R. Goldstein. 1985. Theory and Observation in Ancient and Medieval Astronomy. London: Variorum Reprints.

  • Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G. (eds.). 1987. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, Marjorie. 1963. A Portrait of Aristotle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, Marjorie. 2000. “Recent Work on Aristotelian Biology.” Perspectives on Science 8(4): 444–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson, R. J. 1995. “Philosophy of Science” and “Science.” Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Steven. 1977. Averroes on the Principles of Nature: The Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics I-II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Steven. 1985. “The Hebrew Translation of Averroes’ Prooemium to his Long Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics.” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 52: 55–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Steven. 1997. “Averroes’ Use of Examples in his Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics, and Some Remarks on his Role as Commentator.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7: 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Steven. 1999. “Conspicuous by his Absence: Averroes’ Place Today as an Interpreter of Aristotle.” Gerhard Endress and Jan A. Aertsen (eds.), Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition: Sources, Constitution and Reception of the Philosophy of Ibn Rushd (1126-1198). Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Averroicum (Cologne, 1996). Leiden: Brill, pp. 32–49.

  • Harvey, Steven. 2000. “Shem-Tov ibn Falaquera’s De‘ot ha-Filosofim: Its Sources and Use of Sources.” Harvey Steven (ed.), The Medieval Hebrew Encyclopedia of Science and Philosophy. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 211–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Steven. 2009. “When did Jews Begin to Consider Averroes the Commentator?” J. Meirinhos and O. Weijers (eds.), Florilegium Mediaevale. Louvain-la-Neuve: Brepols, pp. 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Menachem. 1995. “Gersonides on Imitatio Dei and the Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge.” Jewish Quarterly Review 85: 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein-Braslavy, Sara. 2003. “La Structure des Commentaires et la Manière de Commenter les Textes.” Colette Sirat, S. Klein-Braslavy and O. Weijers (eds.), Les Mèthodes de Travail de Gersonide et le Maniement du Savoir chez les Scolastiques. Paris: J. Vrin, pp. 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein-Braslavy, Sara. 2005. “The Alexandrian Prologue Paradigm in Gersonides’ Writings.” Jewish Quarterly Review 95(2): 257–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langermann, Y. Tzvi. 1999. Levi ben Gershom (Gersonides), The Wars of the Lord, Vol. 3. (Translated with Notes by Seymour Feldman). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, pp. 506–519.

  • Lear, Jonathan. 1988. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, James G. 1999. “The Place of Mankind in Aristotle’s Zoology.” Philosophical Topics 27(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, James G. 2001. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Geoffrey Ernst Richard. 1962. “The Development of Aristotle’s Theory of the Classification of Animals.” Phronesis 6: 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancha, José Luis. 1998. “Heuristic Reasoning: Approximation Procedures in Levi ben Gerson’s Astronomy.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 52: 13–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manekin, Charles H. 1992. “Gersonides: Logic, Sciences and Philosophy.” Gad Freudenthal (ed.), Studies on Gersonides: A Fourteenth-Century Jewish Philosopher- Scientist. Leiden: Brill, pp. 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin, Pierre. 1986. Aristotle’s Classification of Animals: Biology and the Conceptual Unity of the Aristotelian Corpus. Berkeley: University of California Press. Translated by Anthony Preus.

  • Touati, Charles. 1973. La Pensee Philosophique et Theologique de Gersonide. Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oppenraay, Aafke M. I. 1999. “Michael Scot’s Arabic-Latin Translation of Aristotle’s Book on Animals.” Carlos Steel, Guy Guldentops and Pieter Beullens (eds.), Aristotle’s Animals in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Malcolm. 1997. “Analogy in Aristotle’s Biology.” Ancient Philosophy 17: 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, Harry A. 1973. “The Twice-Revealed Averroes.” Isadore Twersky and George H. Williams (eds.), Studies in the History of Philosophy and Religion, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 371–401.

  • Zonta, Mauro. 1991. “Ibn al-Ṭayyib Zoologist and Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq’s Revision of Aristotle’s De Animalibus – New Evidence from the Hebrew Tradition.” Aram 3(1–2): 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonta, Mauro. 1996. “Mineralogy, Botany and Zoology in Medieval Hebrew Encyclopedias.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 6: 265–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zonta, Mauro. 1999. “The Zoological Writings in the Hebrew Tradition: The Hebrew Approach to Aristotle’s Zoological Writings and to Their Ancient and Medieval Commentators in the Middle Ages.” Carlos Steel, Guy Guldentops and Pieter Beullens (eds.), Aristotle’s Animals in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 44–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sidney M. Edelstein Center for the History and Philosophy of Science, Technology, and Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Ahuva Gaziel

Authors
  1. Ahuva Gaziel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahuva Gaziel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaziel, A. Questions of Methodology in Aristotle’s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective. J Hist Biol 45, 329–352 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9284-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9284-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation