Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 633–650 | Cite as

The Seven Sisters: Subgenres of Bioi of Contemporary Life Scientists

  • Thomas Söderqvist


Today, scientific biography is primarily thought of as a way of writing contextual history of science. But the genre has other functions as well. This article discusses seven kinds of ideal–typical subgenres of scientific biography. In addition to its mainstream function as an ancilla historiae, it is also frequently used to enrich the understanding of the individual construction of scientific knowledge, to promote the public engagement with science, and as a substitute for belles-lettres. Currently less acknowledged kinds of scientific biography include its use as a medium for public and private, respectively, commemoration. Finally, the use of scientific biography as a research (virtue) ethical genre, providing examples of ‘the good life in science’, is emphasized.


scientific biography genre history of science belles-lettres public engagement with science virtue ethics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abir-Am, Pnina. 1998. La mise en mémoire de la science: Pour une ethnographie historique des rites commémoratifs. Responsable scientifique. Amsterdam: éditions des Archives Contemporaines.Google Scholar
  2. Browne, Janet. 1995. Charles Darwin. Vol. 1: Voyaging. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  3. Browne, Janet. 2002. Charles Darwin. Vol. 2: The Power of Place. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  4. Buber, Martin. 1958. I and Thou. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  5. Crotty, Shane. 2001. Ahead of the Curve: David Baltimore’s Life in Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Desmond, Adrian. 1997. Evolution’s High Priest. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
  7. Desmond, Adrian, Moore, James. 1991. Darwin. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
  8. Duff, Tim. 1999. Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Duff, David (ed.). 2000. Modern Genre Theory. Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
  10. Edel, Leon. 1984. Writing Lives: Principia Biographica. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Ferry, Georgina. 1998. Dorothy Hodgkin: A Life. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  12. Ferry, Georgina. 2007. Max Perutz and the Secret of Life. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, Michel. 1988. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 3: The Care of Self. New York:Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  14. Garber, Elizabeth (ed.). 1990. Beyond History of Science: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Schofield. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gregory, Jane, Miller, Steve. 1998. Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York:Plenum.Google Scholar
  16. Guillain, Georges. 1959. J.-M. Charcot, 18251893: His Life, His Work. London: Pitman, 1959 (J.-M. Charcot 18251893: sa vie, son œuvre. Paris: Masson, 1955).Google Scholar
  17. Hadot, Pierre. 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Hankins, Thomas L. 1979. ‘In Defence of Biography: The Use of Biography in the History of Science.’ History of Science 17: 1–16.Google Scholar
  19. Holmes, Frederic L. 1991. Hans Krebs. Vol. 1: The Formation of a Scientific Life, 1900–1933. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Holmes, Frederic L. 1993. Hans Krebs. Vol. 2: Architect of Intermediary Metabolism, 1933–1937. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jefferson, Ann. 2002. ‘Saint-Beuve: Biography, Criticism, and the Literary.’ Peter France, William St. Clair (eds.), Mapping Lives: The Uses of Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–155.Google Scholar
  22. Kierkegaard, Søren. 1967. Søren Kierkegaard’s Journals and Papers, 1 vols. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 408–409.Google Scholar
  23. Lear, Linda. 1997. Rachel Carson: Witness for Nature. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  24. Lepore, Jill. 2001. ‘Historians Who Love Too Much: Reflections on Microhistory and Biography.’ Journal of American History 88: 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maddox, Brenda. 2002. Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  26. Moraitis, George. 1985. ‘The Psychoanalyst’s Role in the Biographer’s Quest for Self-Awareness.’ Samuel Baron, Carl Pletsch (eds.), Introspection in Biography: The Biographer’s Quest for Self-Awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 319–354.Google Scholar
  27. Murdoch, Iris. 1970. The Sovereignty of Good. London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  28. Nossal, Gustav J.V. 2004. “A Troubled Pilgrim’s Progress: The Compelling Personal Journey of a Founding Father of Cellular Immunology” [Review of Söderqvist, 2003a]. Nature 424: 253–254.Google Scholar
  29. Prüll, Cay-Rüdiger. 2004. ‘Book Review: Science as Autobiography: The Troubled Life of Niels Jerne.’ Medical History 48: 388–389.Google Scholar
  30. Sayre, Anne. 1975. Rosalind Franklin and DNA. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  31. Shortland, Michael. 1996. ‘Bonneted Mechanic and Narrative Hero: The Self-Modelling of Hugh Miller.’ Michael Shortland (ed.), Hugh Miller and the Controversies of Victorian Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Silverstein, Arthur M. 1989. A History of Immunology. San Diego: Academic Press (2nd ed., Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier, 2009).Google Scholar
  33. Skidelsky, Robert. 1988. ‘Only Connect: Biography and Truth.’ E Homberger, J Charmley (eds.), The Troubled Face of Biography. London: Macmillan, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  34. Smocovitis, Vassiliki B. 1999. ‘Living with Your Biographical Subject: Special Problems of Distance, Privacy and Trust in the Biography of G. Ledyard Stebbins Jr.’ Journal of the History of Biology 32: 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Söderqvist, Thomas. 2001. ‘Immunology à la Plutarch: Biographies of Immunologists as an Ethical Genre.’ AM Moulin, A Cambrosio (eds.), Singular Selves: Historical Issues and Contemporary Debates in Immunology. Paris: Elsevier, pp. 287–301.Google Scholar
  36. Söderqvist, Thomas. 2003a. Science as Autobiography: The Troubled Life of Niels Jerne. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Söderqvist, Thomas. 2003b. ‘Wissenschaftsgeschichte á la Plutarch: Biographie über Wissenschaftler als tugendethische Gattung.’ HE Bödeker (ed.), Biographie schreiben. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, pp. 287–325.Google Scholar
  38. Söderqvist, Thomas. 2004. “Jerne, Niels Kaj.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Söderqvist, Thomas. 2006. ‘What is the Use of Writing Lives of Recent Scientists?’ Ronald E Doel, Thomas Söderqvist (eds.), The Historiography of Contemporary Science, Technology, and Medicine: Writing Recent Science. London: Routledge, pp. 99–127.Google Scholar
  40. Söderqvist, Thomas. 2007a. ‘‘No Genre of History Fell Under More Odium than that of Biography’: The Delicate Relations Between Scientific Biography and the Historiography of Science.’ Thomas Söderqvist (ed.), The History and Poetics of Biography in Science, Technology, and Medicine. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 241–262.Google Scholar
  41. Söderqvist, Thomas (ed.). 2007b. The History and Poetics of Biography in Science, Technology, and Medicine. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Söderqvist, Thomas, Stillwell, Craig, Jackson, Mark. 2008. ‘Immunology.’ PJ Bowler, JV Pickstone (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 6: The Modern Biological and Earth Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 467–485.Google Scholar
  43. Statman, Daniel (ed.). 1997. Virtue Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Tuchman, Barbara W. 1986. ‘Biography as a Prism of History.’ SB Oates (ed.), Biography as High Adventure: Life-Writers Speak on Their Art. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 93–103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical MuseionUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations