Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 425–455 | Cite as

Aristotle on the Mechanism of Inheritance

  • Devin Henry
Article

Abstract

In this paper I address an important question in Aristotle’s biology, What are the causal mechanisms behind the transmission of biological form? Aristotle’s answer to this question, I argue, is found in Generation of Animals Book 4 in connection with his investigation into the phenomenon of inheritance. There we are told that an organism’s reproductive material contains a set of “movements'' which are derived from the various “potentials'' of its nature (the internal principle of change that initiates and controls development). These “movements,'' I suggest, function as specialized vehicles for communicating the parts of the parent’s heritable form during the act of reproduction. After exploring the details of this mechanism, I then take up Aristotle’s theory of inheritance proper. At the heart of the theory are three general principles (or ‘laws’) that govern the interactions between the maternal and paternal movements, the outcome of which determines the pattern of inheritance for the offspring. Although this paper is primarily aimed at providing a detailed analysis of Aristotle’s account of inheritance, the results of that analysis have implications for other areas of Aristotle’s biology. One of the most interesting of these is the question of whether Aristotle’s biology is anti-evolutionary (as traditionally assumed) or whether (as I argue) it leaves room for a theory of evolution by natural selection, even if Aristotle himself never took that step.

Keywords

Aristotle Aristotle’s biology Generation of Animals genotype phenotype inheritance evolution nature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balme, David. 1987a. “Teleology and Necessity.” A. Gotthelf and J. Lennox (eds.) (1987), pp. 275–285Google Scholar
  2. Balme, David. 1987b. “Aristotle’s Biology was not Essentialist.” Gotthelf and Lennox (eds.) (1987), pp. 291–312.Google Scholar
  3. Balme, David (1972). Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with passages from II.1–3). Translations with notes. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Coles Andrew. (1995). Biomedical Models of Reproduction in the Fifth Century and Aristotle’s Generation of Animals. Phronesis 40(1): 48–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper John. (1988). Metaphysics in Aristotle’s Embryology. Cambridge Philological Society Proceedings 214(new series 34): 14–41Google Scholar
  6. Furth Montgomery (1988). Substance, Form and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Gotthelf, Allan. 1987. “Aristotle’s Conception of Final Causality.” A. Gotthelf and J. Lennox (eds.) (1987), pp. 204–242Google Scholar
  8. Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James (eds.). (1987). Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutiérrez-Giraldo, David. 2001. “ and Genotype” D. Sfendoni-Mentzou, J. Hattiangadi and D. M. Johnson (eds.) (2001), pp. 163–174Google Scholar
  10. Henry, Devin. 2004. How to Build an Animal: the metaphysics of Aristotle’s ontogeny. PhD dissertation, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. King Richard (2001). Aristotle on Life and Death. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Laubichler, Manfred D. and Wagner, Gunter P. 2000. “Organism and Character Decomposition: Steps towards an Integrative Theory of Biology.” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 67, Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers, Sept. 2002, pp. 289–300Google Scholar
  13. Lennox James (2001). Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Morsink Johannes (1982). Aristotle on the Generation of Animals. University Press of America Inc, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Peck, A. L. (transl.). 1990. Aristotle: Generation of Animals. Loeb Classics, Vol. XIII, Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Salmon Merrilee H. (1999). Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Hackett Publishing Company Inc, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  17. Sfendoni-Mentzou, D., Hattiangadi, J. and Johnson D. M. (eds.), (2001). Aristotle and Contemporary Science. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Witt Charlotte. (1985). Form, Reproduction and Inherited Characteristics in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals. Phronesis 30(1): 46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Talbot CollegeThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations