Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 327–365 | Cite as

Ancient Hunters and Their Modern Representatives: William Sollas’s (1849–1936) Anthropology from Disappointed Bridge to Trunkless Tree and the Instrumentalisation of Racial Conflict

  • Marianne Sommer


During the first decades of the 20th century, many anthropologists who had previously adhered to a linear view of human evolution, from an ape via Pithecanthropus erectus(today Homo erectus) and Neanderthal to modern humans, began to change their outlook. A shift towards a branching model of human evolution began to take hold. Among the scientific factors motivating this trend was the insight that mammalian evolution in general was best represented by a branching tree, rather than by a straight line, and that several new fossil hominids were discovered that differed significantly in their morphology but seemed to date from about the same period. The ideological and practical implications of imperialism and WWI have also been identified as formative of the new evolutionary scenarios in which racial conflict played a crucial role. The paper will illustrate this general shift in anthropological theory for one particular scientist, William Sollas (1849–1936). Sollas achieved a synthesis of human morphological and cultural evolution in what I will refer to as an imperialist model. In this theoretical framework, migration, conflict, and replacement became the main mechanisms for progress spurred by ‘ ȁ8nature’s tyrant,’ natural selection.


anthropology beginning of 20th century Britain diversity vs. linearity Grafton Elliot Smith Gustav Schwalbe Henri Breuil human evolution ideology imperialism Marcellin Boule Neanderthal phylogenetic trees Piltdown Pithecanthropus race Thomas Henry Huxley William Sollas WWI 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. “Ancient Hunters and Their Modern Representatives (Review)”. (1925). The American Historical Review. 30(3): 630–631Google Scholar
  2. Boule, Marcellin. 1908“l’Homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints (Corrèze)”L’Anthropologie19519525Google Scholar
  3. Boule Marcellin. (1911, 1912, 1913). “l’Homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints”. Annales de Paléontologie. 6–8: 1–64, 65–208, 209–279Google Scholar
  4. Boule Marcellin. (1914). (1912). “l’ Homo Néanderthalensis et sa place dans la nature”. In Comptes Rendus, 14e Congrès International d’Anthropologie et d’Archéologie Préhistoriques, Genève. Geneva: KündigGoogle Scholar
  5. Boule Marcellin. (1923). (1921). Fossil Men: Elements of Human Palaeontology. Translated by Ritchie. James and Elliot, Jessie. 2nd ed. Oliver and Boyd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowler Peter, J. 1986Theories of Human Evolution: A Century of Debate, 1844–1944BlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowler, Peter J. 1989The Invention of ProgressThe Victorians and the Past. BlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowler Peter J. (1993). Biology and Social Thought: 1850–1914. Five Lectures Delivered at the International Summer School in History of Science, Uppsala, July 1990, Berkeley Papers in the History of Science 15. Office for History of Science and Technology, University of California at Berkeley, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd, Dawkins., William.,  1874Cave Hunting, Researches on the Evidence of Caves Respecting the Early Inhabitants of EuropeMacmillanLondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd, Dawkins., William.,  1880Early Man in Britain and His Place in the Tertiary PeriodMacmillanLondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyd, Dawkins., William.,  1910“The Arrival of Man in Britain in the Pleistocene Age”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland40233263Google Scholar
  12. Brace, Loring C. 1997“Modern Human Origins: Narrow Focus or Broad Spectrum?”Clark, G.A.Willermet, C.M. eds. Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins ResearchAldine de GruyterNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Breuil Henri. (1913). (1912). “Les subdivisions du paléolithique supérieur et leur signification”. In Comptes Rendus, 14e Congrès International d’Anthropologie et d’ Archéologie Préhistoriques, Genève. Geneva: KündigGoogle Scholar
  14. Brice, W.C. 1955“The Study of Prehistory (Review of Ancient Hunters)”Man.559Google Scholar
  15. Brown, Robert M. 1912“Ancient Hunters, and Their Modern Representatives (Review)”Bulletin of the American Geographical Society.44702Google Scholar
  16. Cope, Edward D. 1893“The Genealogy of Man”American Naturalist27316335Google Scholar
  17. Dart, Raymond A. 1974“Sir Grafton Elliot Smith and the Evolution of Man”Elkin, A.P.Macintosh, N.W.G. eds. Grafton Elliot Smith: The Man and his WorkSydney University PressSydneyGoogle Scholar
  18. Delisle, R.G. 2000“The Biology/Culture Link in Human Evolution, 1750–1950: The Problem of Integration in Science”Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences.31531556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dubois, Eugène. 1894Pithecanthropus erectus: Eine menschenähnliche Übergangsform aus JavaLandsdrukkerijBataviaGoogle Scholar
  20. Elkin, A.P.Macintosh, N.W.G. eds. 1974Grafton Elliot Smith: The Man and his WorkSydney University PressSydneyGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliot Smith., Grafton. (1911). The Ancient Egyptians and Their Influence Upon the Civilisation of Europe. LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Elliot, Smith., Gafton.,  1914“Report of a Paper Read Before the Royal Society”Nature.92729Google Scholar
  23. Elliot, Smith., Gafton.,  1924The Evolution of Man: EssaysOxford University PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliot, Smith., Gafton.,  1929Human HistoryW. W. Norton and CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Elliot, Smith., Gafton.,  1933The Diffusion of CultureWatts and CoLondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Findlay, G.H. 1972Dr Robert Broom, F.R.S., Palaeontologist and Physician / 1866–1951: A Biography, Appreciation and Bibliography, South African Biographical and Historical StudiesA. A. BalkemaCape TownGoogle Scholar
  27. Franzen., Jens, Lorenz. eds. 1994100 Years of Pithecanthropus: The Homo Erectus Problem, Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg Frankfurt am Main 171Senckenbergsche Naturforschende GesellschaftFrankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  28. Green, Vivian. 1993“The University and the Nation”Prest, J. eds. The Illustrated History of Oxford University.Oxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Gregory., , William, King. 1920“The Origin and Evolution of the Human Dentition: A Palaeontological Review (Part 4)”The Journal of Dental Research4607689Google Scholar
  30. Hammond, Michael. 1979“A Framework of Plausibility for an Anthropological Forgery: The Piltdown Case”Anthropology34758Google Scholar
  31. Hammond, Michael. 1982“The Expulsion of the Neanderthals from Human Ancestry: Marcellin Boule and the Social Context of Scientific Research”Social Studies of Science.12136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hammond, Michael. 1988“The Shadow Man Paradigm in Paleoanthropology: 1911–1945”Stocking, G.W. eds. Bones, Bodies, Behavior: Essays on Biological Anthropology.University of Wisconsin PressWisconsinGoogle Scholar
  33. Hazzledine, Warren S. 1912“Palaeolithic Man and his Art (Review of Ancient Hunters)”Man12203206Google Scholar
  34. Hazzledine, Warren S. 1916“Archaeology: Palaeolithic Art (Review of Ancient Hunters)”Man167980Google Scholar
  35. Houghton, Brodrick., Alan.,  1963Father of PrehistoryThe Abbé Henri Breuil: His Life and Times. William Morrow & CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Howell Clark F. (1994). (1991). “Thoughts on Eugène Dubois and the “ Pithecanthropus” Saga”. In J.L. Franzen (ed.), 100 Years of Pithecanthropus: The Homo Erectus Problem. Frankfurt am Main: Senckenbergsche Naturforschende GesellschaftGoogle Scholar
  37. Huxley, Thomas H. 1894Man’s Place in Nature and Other Anthropological Essays, Collected Essays by T.H. Huxley VIIMacmillan and CoLondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Jordan, Paul. 1999Neanderthal: Neanderthal Man and the Story of Human OriginsSutton PublishingStroudGoogle Scholar
  39. King, William. 1864“The Reputed Fossil Man of Neanderthal”Quarterly Journal of Science18897Google Scholar
  40. Laguna, Frederica 1932“A Comparison of Eskimo and Palaeolithic Art”American Journal of Archaeology.36477511Google Scholar
  41. Lowie, Robert H. 1915“Ancient Hunters and Their Modern Representatives (Review)”American Anthropologist, New Series.17575576Google Scholar
  42. Lubbock Sir John. (1869) (1865). Pre-Historic Times, as Illustrated by Ancient Remains, and the Manners and Customes of Modern Savages. 2nd ed. Williams and Norgate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. MacCurdy., , George, Grant. 1915“Ancient Hunters and their Modern Representatives (Review)”The American Historical Review.21135137Google Scholar
  44. Matthew., William Diller. (1915) (1911). “Climate and Evolution”. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 24: 171–318Google Scholar
  45. Osborn., , Henry, Fairfield. 1928“The Plateau Habitat of the Pro-Dawn Man”Science, New Series.67570571Google Scholar
  46. P., E.A 1925“Ancient Hunters and Their Modern Representatives (Review)”Geographical Review.65541543Google Scholar
  47. Ripley, William Z. 1899‘The Races of Europe: A Sociological Study’D. Appleton and CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwalbe, Gustav. 1906Studien zur Vorgeschichte des MenschenSchweizerbartscheStuttgartGoogle Scholar
  49. Shipman, Pat., Storm, Paul. 2002“Missing Links: Eugène Dubois and the Origin of Paleoanthropology”Evolutionary Anthropology.11108116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, Woodward., Arthur.,  1925“The Origin of Man”Scientific Monthly.211319Google Scholar
  51. Sollas, , William, Johnson. 1880(1879). “On Some Eskimos’ Bone Implements from the East Coast of Greenland”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland9329336Google Scholar
  52. Sollas, , William, Johnson. 1895““Pithecanthropus erectus” and the Evolution of the Human Race”Nature.53150151Google Scholar
  53. Sollas, William Johnson. (1908)(1907). “On the Cranial and Facial Characters of the Neandertal Race”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of Biological Character 199: 281–339Google Scholar
  54. Sollas, , William, Johnson. 1910“The Anniversary Address of the President (On the Evolution of Man)”Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London665488Google Scholar
  55. Sollas, , William, Johnson. 1911Ancient Hunters and Their Modern RepresentativesMacmillanLondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Sollas, William Johnson. (1915) (1911). Ancient Hunters and Their Modern Representatives. 2nd ed. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Sollas, William Johnson. (1924) (1911). Ancient Hunters and Their Modern Representatives. 3rd ed. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Sollas, William Johnson. (1926) (1925). “On a Sagittal Section of the Skull of Australopithecus Africanus”. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London.82(325): 1–11Google Scholar
  59. Sollas, , William, Johnson. 1927“The Chancelade Skull”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland5789122Google Scholar
  60. Sollas, , William, Johnson. 1933“The Sagittal Section of the Human Skull”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland63389431Google Scholar
  61. Sommer, Marianne. in print. “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall... Neanderthal as Image and “Distortion” in Early 20th Century French Science and Press”. Social Science StudiesGoogle Scholar
  62. Spencer, Frank. 1984“The Neanderthals and Their Evolutionary Significance: A Brief Historical Survey”Spencer, F.Smith, F.H. eds. The Origins of Modern Humans: A World Survey of the Fossil Evidence.Alan R. LissNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Spencer, Frank. 1988“Prologue to a Scientific Forgery: The British Eolithic Movement from Abbeville to Piltdown”Stocking, G.W. eds. Bones, Bodies, Behavior: Essays on Biological Anthropology.University of Wisconsin PressWisconsinGoogle Scholar
  64. Spencer, Frank. 1990The Piltdown Papers, 1908–1955. The Correspondence and other Documents Relating to the Piltdown Forgery, Natural History Museum PublicationsOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Spencer Frank. (1995). “Pithekus to Pithecanthropus: An Abbreviated Review of Changing Scientific Views on the Relationship of the Anthropoid Apes to Homo”. In: Corbey R., Theunissen B. (ed). Ape, Man, Apeman: Changing Views since 1600. Evaluative Proceedings of the Symposium Ape, Man, Apeman: Changing Views since 1600, Leiden, the Netherlands, 28 June–1 July, 1993. Leiden University, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  66. Spencer, Frank., Smith, Fred H. 1981“The Significance of Ales Hrdlicka’s “Neanderthal Phase of Man”: A Historical and Current Assessment”American Journal of Physical Anthropology56435459Google Scholar
  67. Stepan, Nancy Leys. 1986“Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science”Isis.77261277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stocking, George W. 1994“The Turn-of-the-Century Concept of Race”Modernism/Modernity.1416Google Scholar
  69. Stocking, George W. 1995After Tylor: British Social Anthropology 1888–1951The University of Wisconsin PressMadisonGoogle Scholar
  70. Straus, W.L., Cave, A.J.E. 1957“Pathology and Posture of Neanderthal Man”Quarterly Review of Biology.32348363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Symonds, Richard. 1986Oxford and EmpireThe Last Lost Cause?. St. Martin’s PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Symonds Richard. (2000). “Oxford and the Empire”. In: Brock M.G., Curthoys M.C. (ed). The History of the University of Oxford. Volume VII: 19th-Century Oxford, Part 2. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  73. Testut, Léo. 1890“Recherches anthropologiques sur le squelette quaternaire de Chancelade, Dordogne”Bulletin de la Société d’Anthropologie de Lyon.8131246Google Scholar
  74. Theunissen, Bert. 1989Eugene Dubois and the Ape-Man from JavaKluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  75. Trinkaus Erik., Shipman Pat. (1993) (1992). The Neanderthals: Changing the Image of Mankind. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Tylor Edward Burnett. (1958) (1871). Primitive Culture. 2 Vols, The Library of Religion and Culture. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Vergata, Antonello La 1994“Evolution and War, 1871–1918”Nuncius.9143163Google Scholar
  78. Weiner Joseph S., Oakley Kenneth P., Clark., Wilfrid E. Le Gros. November (1953). “The Solution to the Piltdown Problem”. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 2: 141–146Google Scholar
  79. Winter, J.M. 1994“Oxford and the First World War”Harrison, B. eds. The History of the University of Oxford. Vol. VIII. The Twentieth CenturyClarendonOxford12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science StudiesSwiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH Zentrum RACZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations