Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 185–207 | Cite as

Indian Science for Indian Tigers?: Conservation Biology and the Question of Cultural Values

  • Michael Lewis


The implementation of Project Tiger in India, 1973–1974, was justly hailed as a triumph of international environmental advocacy. It occurred as a growing number of conservation-oriented biologists were beginning to argue forcefully for scientifically managed conservation of species and ecosystems – the same scientists who would, by the mid-1980s, call themselves conservation biologists. Although India accepted international funds to implement Project Tiger, it strictly limited research posts to Government of India Foresters, against the protests of Indian and US biologists who hoped to conduct the scientific studies that would lead to better management and thus more effective conservation of the tiger. The foresters were not trained to conduct research, and in fact did not produce any of significance for the first 15 years of Project Tiger’s existence. The failure of biologists to gain access to India’s tigers in the 1970s was caused by many factors, but not least among them was a history of disdain among conservation-oriented biologists for government officials managing reserves, and the local politics of conservation. Project Tiger, then, serves as a case study for the discussion of the intersection of conservation biology with non-scientific concerns, including nationalism and the desire of the Indian government to more completely control its land.1I would like to thank the participants in the 2003 Southwest Colloquium for the Life Sciences for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper, as well as the two unusually helpful (anonymous) reviewers.


Bombay Natural History Society Conservation Biology India Indian Forestry Service Indira Gandhi Project Tiger Smithsonian Institution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, D. G.Berglund, E. eds. 2003Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of PriviligeBerghahn BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous, 1974. “Tiger, Tiger, Burning Bright, How Did Thou Die?” National Herald, September 5: 3.Google Scholar
  3. Christen, C. 2002“At Home in the Field: Smithsonian Tropical Science Field Stations in the U.S. Panama Canal Zone and the Republic of Panama ”Americas58537575Google Scholar
  4. Gee, E. P. 1964The Wildlife of IndiaOxford University PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Grumbine, R. E. 1992Ghost Bears: Exploring the Biodiversity CrisisIsland PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Indian Board for Wild Life1972Task Force: Project TigerA Planning Proposal for Preservation of Tiger (Panthera tigris tigris Linn.) in India. Ministry of AgricultureNew DelhiGoogle Scholar
  7. Kingsland, S. 1995Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Biology2University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Latour, B. 1993We Have Never Been ModernHarvard University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis, M. 2004Inventing Global Ecology: Tracking the Biodiversity Ideal in India, 1947–1997Ohio University PressAthensGoogle Scholar
  10. McClure, E., 1995. Stories I Like to Tell: An Autobiography. Camarilo, California: Elliott McClure [published by author].Google Scholar
  11. Quammen, D. 1996The Song of the Dodo: Island Biogeography in an Age of ExtinctionSimon and SchusterNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Record Unit 254. The Assistant Secretary for Science, 1963–1978. Smithsonian Institution Archives.Google Scholar
  13. Record Unit 271. Ecology Program, Office of Environmental Sciences, 1965–1973. Smithsonian Institution Archives.Google Scholar
  14. Record Unit 7008. S. Dillon Ripley Papers, 1913–1993 and undated, with related materials from 1807, 1871–1891. Smithsonian Institution Archives.Google Scholar
  15. Sankhala, K. 1977Tiger! The Story of the Indian TigerSimon and SchusterNew York CityGoogle Scholar
  16. Schaller, G. 1967The Deer and the Tiger: A Study of Wildlife in IndiaUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Sukumar, R. 1990“The Nagerhole Tiger Controversy.”Current Science5912131216Google Scholar
  18. Sunquist, F. 1988Tiger MoonUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Takacs, D. 1996The Idea of Biodiversity, Philosophies of ParadiseJohn Hopkins University PressBaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  20. Thapar, V., 1998. “Fatal Links.” Seminar 466. June: 59–69.Google Scholar
  21. Tjossem, S., 1993. “Preservation of Nature and Academic Respectability: Tensions in the Ecological Society of America, 1915–1979,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  22. Wemmer, C., Simons, R. and Mishra, H., 2004. “The Smithsonian-Nepal Tiger Ecology Project: Case History of a Cooperative International Conservation Program,” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, E. O. 1994NaturalistIsland PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistorySalisbury UniversitySalisburyUSA

Personalised recommendations