Abstract
Today, most college students use the Internet when preparing for exams or homework. Yet, research has shown that undergraduates’ information literacy skills are often insufficient. In this paper, we empirically test the relation between information-seeking strategies and grades in university. We synthesise arguments from the literature on information-seeking behaviour and approaches to learning in tertiary education. Building on the distinction between deep- and surface-level learning, we develop a classification of online search strategies and contrast it with traditional information behaviour. Multivariate analyses using a two-wave online survey among undergraduate students at a German university indicate that using advanced online information-seeking strategies is a significant and robust predictor of better grades. However, there are notable differences between subject groups: Traditional information behaviour is still crucial in the humanities. Advanced search strategies are beneficial in all settings, but only one in four students uses these early on, while this share increases to around 50% over the course of studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attewell, P. (2001). Comment: the first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252–259.
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333.
Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260.
Bernstein, B. B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Biggs, J. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4), 381–394.
Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of metalearning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(3), 185–212.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Bilal, D., & Kirby, J. (2002). Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users. Information Processing & Management, 38(5), 649–670.
Borghans, L., & Ter Weel, B. (2007). The diffusion of computers and the distribution of wages. European Economic Review, 51(3), 715–748.
Brennan, J., Jary, D., Richardson, J. T. E., & Osborne, M. (2010). The social and organisational mediation of university learning. In J. Brennan, R. Edmunds, M. Houston, D. Jary, Y. Lebeau, M. Osborne, & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Improving what is learned at university (pp. 29–42). Abingdon: Routledge.
Burger, R. (2015). CampusPanel user handbook: Documentation for the student panel of the ScienceCampus Tuebingen (wave ‘b’). Tübingen: Univ. of Tübingen.
Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1057–1068.
Callinan, J. E. (2005). Information-seeking behaviour of undergraduate biology students: a comparative analysis of first year and final year students in University College Dublin. Library Review, 54(2), 86–99.
Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: a comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–138.
Civilcharran, S., Hughes, M., & Maharaj, M. S. (2015). Uncovering Web search tactics in South African higher education. South African Journal of Information Management, 17(1), 1–8.
Cox, M. J., & Marshall, G. (2007). Effects of ICT: do we know what we should know? Education and Information Technologies, 12(2), 59–70.
Dinet, J., Chevalier, A., & Tricot, A. (2012). Information search activity: an overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 49–62.
Diseth, Å. (2007). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32(3), 373–388.
Durkin, K., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2012). Frequency of educational computer use as a longitudinal predictor of educational outcome in young people with specific language impairment. PLoS One, 7(12), e52194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052194.
Engels, T. C. E., Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Spruyt, E. H. J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 93(2), 373–390.
Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19(2), 169–194.
Gkorezis, P., Kostagiolas, P., & Niakas, D. (2017). Linking exploration to academic performance: the role of information seeking and academic self-efficacy. Library Management, 38(8/9), 404–414.
Hargens, L. L. (2000). Using the literature: reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship. American Sociological Review, 65(6), 846–865.
Helms-Park, R., Radia, P., & Stapleton, P. (2007). A preliminary assessment of Google Scholar as a source of EAP students’ research materials. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 65–76.
Hillmert, S., Groß, M., Schmidt-Hertha, B., & Weber, H. (2017). Informational environments and college student dropout. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 27–52). New York: Springer.
Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: the relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28(1), 187–198.
Karagiannopoulou, E., & Milienos, F. S. (2015). Testing two path models to explore relationships between students’ experiences of the teaching-learning environment, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 35(1), 26–52.
Lang, V., & Hillmert, S. (2014). CampusPanel user handbook: Documentation for the student panel of the ScienceCampus Tuebingen (wave ‘a’). Tübingen: Univ. of Tübingen.
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52.
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Olsen, M. W., & Diekema, A. R. (2012). “I just Wikipedia it”: information behaviour of first-year writing students. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–11.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing https://www.r-project.org/.
Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–150.
Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students’ approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.
Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4), 453–472.
Thatcher, A. (2008). Web search strategies: the influence of web experience and task type. Information Processing & Management, 44(3), 1308–1329.
Timmers, C. F., & Glas, C. A. W. (2010). Developing scales for information-seeking behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 46–69.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., & Millan, E. S. (2013). Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 363–378.
Tsai, M.-J. (2009). Online information searching strategy inventory (OISSI): a quick version and a complete version. Computers & Education, 53(2), 473–483.
Tsai, M.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43–50.
Van Lohuizen, M. T., Kuks, J. B. M., Van Hell, E. A., Raat, A. N., & Cohen-Schotanus, J. (2009). Learning strategies during clerkships and their effects on clinical performance. Medical Teacher, 31(11), e494–e499.
Weber, H., Hillmert, S., & Rott, K. (2018). Can digital information literacy among undergraduates be improved? Evidence from an experimental study. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449740.
Whitmire, E. (2002). Disciplinary differences and undergraduates’ information-seeking behaviour. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(8), 631–638.
Wittwer, J., & Senkbeil, M. (2008). Is students’ computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school? Computers & Education, 50(4), 1558–1571.
Zeegers, P. (2004). Student learning in higher education: a path analysis of academic achievement in science. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 35–56.
Zhang, L.-F. (2000). University students’ learning approaches in three cultures: an investigation of Biggs’s 3P model. The Journal of Psychology, 134(1), 37–55.
Zhu, Y. Q., Chen, L. Y., Chen, H. G., & Chern, C. C. (2011). How does internet information seeking help academic performance?–the moderating and mediating roles of academic self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2476–2484.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Leibniz ScienceCampus Tuebingen “Informational Environments”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, H., Becker, D. & Hillmert, S. Information-seeking behaviour and academic success in higher education: Which search strategies matter for grade differences among university students and how does this relevance differ by field of study?. High Educ 77, 657–678 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0296-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0296-4